Performance of a No-Till Vegetable Transplanter for Transplanting Thai Round Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) in Conservation Agriculture

Lyhour Hin, B. Buntong, M. Reyes, L. Hok, L. Lor, H. Clemmons, T. Kornecki
{"title":"Performance of a No-Till Vegetable Transplanter for Transplanting Thai Round Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) in Conservation Agriculture","authors":"Lyhour Hin, B. Buntong, M. Reyes, L. Hok, L. Lor, H. Clemmons, T. Kornecki","doi":"10.17265/2162-5263/2020.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Vegetables are vital for human health and are consumed five days a week in Cambodia. However, the production cannot meet domestic demands due to labor-intensive farming and production costs related to soil tillage. Mechanization is needed along with soil quality and sustainability improvements by the adoption of CA (Conservation Agriculture). The research aimed to compare the performance of the no-till vegetable transplanter with punch-planter in CA and hand transplanting in CT (Conventional Tillage). The study was conducted at the Royal University of Agriculture, Cambodia, starting from January to September 2020, by firstly growing sunn hemp as a cover crop and then transplanting Thai round eggplant. A randomized complete block design was used with three treatments, replicated three times. Each plot was 2 m by 15 m, with 0.2-m row spacing. The results showed that the transplanter speed was 0.54 km (cid:120) h -1 , almost two times the speed of punch planter and 9 times the speed of hand transplanting. The highest working capacity was also achieved with the transplanter. However, different transplanting did not affect plant spacing, or plant density. Plant spacing was 1 m, and plant density varied from 10,300 to 11,500 plants (cid:120) ha -1 . Plant growth and yield were also not influenced by the transplanter in CA, or hand transplanting in CT. Average fruit diameter, fruit weight, fruit number, and yield were 38 mm, 31.4 g (cid:120) fruit -1 , 15.7 fruits (cid:120) plant -1 and 3.9 t (cid:120) ha -1 , respectively. The maximum working area of the transplanter and its break-even area were 25.2 ha (cid:120) y -1 and 18.3 ha (cid:120) y -1 , respectively. Using the no-till transplanter may save both time and labor, but its use in combination with CA was unlikely to affect plant growth and yield in the short term.","PeriodicalId":58493,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与工程:B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与工程:B","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2162-5263/2020.06.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Vegetables are vital for human health and are consumed five days a week in Cambodia. However, the production cannot meet domestic demands due to labor-intensive farming and production costs related to soil tillage. Mechanization is needed along with soil quality and sustainability improvements by the adoption of CA (Conservation Agriculture). The research aimed to compare the performance of the no-till vegetable transplanter with punch-planter in CA and hand transplanting in CT (Conventional Tillage). The study was conducted at the Royal University of Agriculture, Cambodia, starting from January to September 2020, by firstly growing sunn hemp as a cover crop and then transplanting Thai round eggplant. A randomized complete block design was used with three treatments, replicated three times. Each plot was 2 m by 15 m, with 0.2-m row spacing. The results showed that the transplanter speed was 0.54 km (cid:120) h -1 , almost two times the speed of punch planter and 9 times the speed of hand transplanting. The highest working capacity was also achieved with the transplanter. However, different transplanting did not affect plant spacing, or plant density. Plant spacing was 1 m, and plant density varied from 10,300 to 11,500 plants (cid:120) ha -1 . Plant growth and yield were also not influenced by the transplanter in CA, or hand transplanting in CT. Average fruit diameter, fruit weight, fruit number, and yield were 38 mm, 31.4 g (cid:120) fruit -1 , 15.7 fruits (cid:120) plant -1 and 3.9 t (cid:120) ha -1 , respectively. The maximum working area of the transplanter and its break-even area were 25.2 ha (cid:120) y -1 and 18.3 ha (cid:120) y -1 , respectively. Using the no-till transplanter may save both time and labor, but its use in combination with CA was unlikely to affect plant growth and yield in the short term.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
免耕蔬菜移栽机在保护性农业中移植泰国圆茄的性能研究
:蔬菜对人类健康至关重要,在柬埔寨每周食用五天。然而,由于劳动密集型农业和与土壤耕作相关的生产成本,生产无法满足国内需求。通过采用CA(保护性农业),需要在提高土壤质量和可持续性的同时进行机械化。本研究旨在比较CA中的免耕蔬菜插秧机与冲孔播种机和CT(常规耕作)中的手动插秧机的性能。这项研究于2020年1月至9月在柬埔寨皇家农业大学进行,首先种植sunn大麻作为覆盖作物,然后移植泰国圆茄子。随机完全区组设计用于三种治疗,重复三次。每个地块为2米乘15米,行间距为0.2米。结果表明,插秧机速度为0.54km(cid:120)h-1,几乎是打孔播种机速度的2倍,是手动插秧机的9倍。插秧机也达到了最高的工作能力。然而,不同的移植并不影响植株间距或密度。株间距为1m,密度为10300-11500株(cid:120)ha-1。CA中的插秧机和CT中的手动插秧也不影响植株的生长和产量。平均果径、果重、果数和产量分别为38mm、31.4g(cid:120)果-1、15.7果(cid:12 0)株-1和3.9t(cid:120)ha-1。插秧机的最大工作面积和盈亏平衡面积分别为25.2公顷(cid:120)y-1和18.3公顷(acid:120)y-1。使用免耕插秧机可以节省时间和劳动力,但与CA结合使用在短期内不太可能影响植物的生长和产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
575
期刊最新文献
Wastewater Use for Corn and Bean Crops Stability and Removal of Commonly Used Drugs in Environmental Water and Wastewater Seroprevalence of Brucellosis Disease and Lumpy Skin Disease on Cattles at Svay Rieng and Prey Veng Province, Cambodia Revisiting Port Regulatory Governance & Substance: Towards a Holistic Supply Chain Approach Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Research in the Integration of 5G/6G Networks, LEO Satellites, and IoT for Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development at ECSTAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1