Evaluation of School-age Hearing Screening Applications: The Tele-audiological Perspective

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.4274/jarem.galenos.2022.99608
A. Ceylan, E. Kara, M. Kesimli, Deniz Kaya, A. Ataş
{"title":"Evaluation of School-age Hearing Screening Applications: The Tele-audiological Perspective","authors":"A. Ceylan, E. Kara, M. Kesimli, Deniz Kaya, A. Ataş","doi":"10.4274/jarem.galenos.2022.99608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Hearing health is one of the areas that should be considered especially in childhood. School-age hearing screening (SAHS) is important for the detection and prevention of hearing loss. The aim of our study is to compare the use of teleaudiological applications for SAHS with standard SAHS applications and to determine possible similarities or differences between the methods. Methods: The study was carried out with a total of 224 students who were first-year students in the same primary school within the borders of Istanbul. The study was completed in two phases with a test session at 15-day intervals. In the first stage, video-otoscope images of all individuals who would be subjected to standard SAHS were recorded and tympanometry test was performed. In the second stage, SAHS results were recorded with the tele-audiological method. Results: According to the tympanometry results obtained from the participants, it was determined that the rate of abnormal hearing was 4.5%. According to the video-otoscope results, which were evaluated as asynchronous, the number of students suspected of dense earwax plug and membrane pathology was 6.7% in the left ear and 5.8 in the right ear. According to the SAHS method results, the average rate of passing and failing the test in the standard method was 12.9% in the right ear, and 12.9% in the left ear. According to the results of the tele-audiological method of the same student group, the rate of failing the test was 16.1% in the right ear and 15.2 in the left ear. Conclusion: Measuring tele-audiologically or using the standard method did not affect the test results. Accordingly, the test result is independent of whether the test is performed with the tele-audiological or standard method.","PeriodicalId":56162,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jarem.galenos.2022.99608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hearing health is one of the areas that should be considered especially in childhood. School-age hearing screening (SAHS) is important for the detection and prevention of hearing loss. The aim of our study is to compare the use of teleaudiological applications for SAHS with standard SAHS applications and to determine possible similarities or differences between the methods. Methods: The study was carried out with a total of 224 students who were first-year students in the same primary school within the borders of Istanbul. The study was completed in two phases with a test session at 15-day intervals. In the first stage, video-otoscope images of all individuals who would be subjected to standard SAHS were recorded and tympanometry test was performed. In the second stage, SAHS results were recorded with the tele-audiological method. Results: According to the tympanometry results obtained from the participants, it was determined that the rate of abnormal hearing was 4.5%. According to the video-otoscope results, which were evaluated as asynchronous, the number of students suspected of dense earwax plug and membrane pathology was 6.7% in the left ear and 5.8 in the right ear. According to the SAHS method results, the average rate of passing and failing the test in the standard method was 12.9% in the right ear, and 12.9% in the left ear. According to the results of the tele-audiological method of the same student group, the rate of failing the test was 16.1% in the right ear and 15.2 in the left ear. Conclusion: Measuring tele-audiologically or using the standard method did not affect the test results. Accordingly, the test result is independent of whether the test is performed with the tele-audiological or standard method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学龄期听力筛查应用的评价:远程听力学视角
目的:听力健康是儿童尤其是青少年应重视的问题之一。学龄听力筛查(SAHS)对于发现和预防听力损失非常重要。本研究的目的是比较远程听力学在SAHS中的应用与标准SAHS的应用,并确定两种方法之间可能的相似或差异。方法:研究对象为伊斯坦布尔境内同一所小学的224名一年级学生。研究分两个阶段完成,每隔15天进行一次测试。在第一阶段,记录所有将接受标准SAHS的个体的视频耳镜图像,并进行鼓室测量测试。第二阶段,用远程听力学方法记录SAHS结果。结果:根据参与者的鼓室测量结果,确定听力异常率为4.5%。视频耳镜检查结果为非同步检查,疑似左耳致密耳垢塞及膜状病变的学生占6.7%,右耳占5.8。根据SAHS方法结果,标准方法的平均合格率为右耳12.9%,左耳12.9%。同一学生组远程听力学测试结果显示,右耳不合格率为16.1%,左耳不合格率为15.2%。结论:远程听力学测量或使用标准方法不影响测试结果。因此,测试结果与测试是否使用远程听力学方法或标准方法无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM
Journal of Academic Research in Medicine-JAREM MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Relationship Between the Protrusion of the Optic Nerve and Internal Carotid Artery and Sphenoid Sinus Volume Would Women Who Have Been Informed About Automated Breast Ultrasound Prefer This Method to Manuel Ultrasound? Cyberchondria’s Possible Relationship with Problematic Internet Use and eHealth Literacy Prediction of Difficulty Level of Laparoscopic Cholecistectomy According to Preoperative Findings Synthesis of Graphene Oxide and Evaluation of Its Cytotoxic Effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1