Conceptualizing and redefining successful patient engagement in patient advisory councils in learning health networks

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Learning Health Systems Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1002/lrh2.10377
Madeleine Huwe, Becky Woolf, Jennie David, Michael Seid, Shehzad Saeed, Peter Margolis, ImproveCareNow Pediatric IBD Learning Health System
{"title":"Conceptualizing and redefining successful patient engagement in patient advisory councils in learning health networks","authors":"Madeleine Huwe,&nbsp;Becky Woolf,&nbsp;Jennie David,&nbsp;Michael Seid,&nbsp;Shehzad Saeed,&nbsp;Peter Margolis,&nbsp;ImproveCareNow Pediatric IBD Learning Health System","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Patient engagement has historically referenced engagement in one's healthcare, with more recent definitions expanding patient engagement to encompass patient advocacy work in Learning Health Networks (LHNs). Efforts to conceptualize and define what patient engagement means—and what <i>successful</i> patient engagement means—are, however, lacking and a barrier to meaningful and sustainable patient engagement via patient advisory councils (PACs) across LHNs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Several co-authors (Madeleine Huwe, Becky Woolf, Jennie David) are former ImproveCareNow (ICN) PAC members, and we integrate a narrative review of the extant literature and a case study of our lived experiences as former ICN PAC members. We present nuanced themes of successful patient engagement from our lived experiences on ICN's PAC, with illustrative quotes from other PAC members, and then propose themes and metrics to consider in patient engagement across LHNs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Successful patient engagement in our experiences with ICN's PAC reaches beyond the “levels of engagement” previously described in the literature. We posit that our successful patient/PAC engagement experiences with ICN represent key mechanisms that could be applied across LHNs, including (1) personal growth for PAC members, (2) PAC internal engagement/community, (3) PAC engagement and presence within the LHN, (4) local institutional engagement for those who participate in the LHN, and (5) tangible resources/products from PAC members.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patient engagement in LHNs, like ICN, holds significant power to meaningfully shape and co-produce healthcare systems, and engagement is undervalued and conceptualized dichotomously (eg, engaged or not engaged). Reconceptualizing successful patient/PAC engagement is critical in ongoing efforts to study, support, and understand mechanisms of sustainable and successful patient engagement. Having a modern, multidimensional definition for successful patient engagement in LHNs can support efforts to increase underrepresented voices in PACs, measure and track successful multidimensional patient engagement, and study how successful patient engagement may impact outcomes for patients and LHNs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10377","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patient engagement has historically referenced engagement in one's healthcare, with more recent definitions expanding patient engagement to encompass patient advocacy work in Learning Health Networks (LHNs). Efforts to conceptualize and define what patient engagement means—and what successful patient engagement means—are, however, lacking and a barrier to meaningful and sustainable patient engagement via patient advisory councils (PACs) across LHNs.

Methods

Several co-authors (Madeleine Huwe, Becky Woolf, Jennie David) are former ImproveCareNow (ICN) PAC members, and we integrate a narrative review of the extant literature and a case study of our lived experiences as former ICN PAC members. We present nuanced themes of successful patient engagement from our lived experiences on ICN's PAC, with illustrative quotes from other PAC members, and then propose themes and metrics to consider in patient engagement across LHNs.

Results

Successful patient engagement in our experiences with ICN's PAC reaches beyond the “levels of engagement” previously described in the literature. We posit that our successful patient/PAC engagement experiences with ICN represent key mechanisms that could be applied across LHNs, including (1) personal growth for PAC members, (2) PAC internal engagement/community, (3) PAC engagement and presence within the LHN, (4) local institutional engagement for those who participate in the LHN, and (5) tangible resources/products from PAC members.

Conclusion

Patient engagement in LHNs, like ICN, holds significant power to meaningfully shape and co-produce healthcare systems, and engagement is undervalued and conceptualized dichotomously (eg, engaged or not engaged). Reconceptualizing successful patient/PAC engagement is critical in ongoing efforts to study, support, and understand mechanisms of sustainable and successful patient engagement. Having a modern, multidimensional definition for successful patient engagement in LHNs can support efforts to increase underrepresented voices in PACs, measure and track successful multidimensional patient engagement, and study how successful patient engagement may impact outcomes for patients and LHNs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念化和重新定义学习健康网络中患者咨询委员会中成功的患者参与
导言:患者参与历来指的是参与个人的医疗保健,最近的定义将患者参与扩展到包括学习型医疗网络(LHNs)中的患者宣传工作。然而,目前还缺乏对患者参与的含义--以及成功的患者参与的含义--进行概念化和定义的努力,这也是通过患者咨询委员会(PACs)在LHNs中开展有意义和可持续的患者参与的障碍。 方法 几位共同作者(Madeleine Huwe、Becky Woolf、Jennie David)都曾是 "现在改善医疗"(ICN)患者咨询委员会(PAC)的成员,我们将对现有文献的叙述性回顾与我们作为前 ICN PAC 成员的亲身经历的案例研究相结合。我们从自己在 ICN PAC 的亲身经历中提出了患者成功参与的细微主题,并引用了其他 PAC 成员的例证,然后提出了 LHN 患者参与的主题和衡量标准。 结果 在我们与 ICN 患者咨询委员会合作的经历中,患者的成功参与超出了以往文献中描述的 "参与程度"。我们认为,我们在 ICN 的患者/PAC 成功参与经验代表了可应用于所有 LHN 的关键机制,包括:(1)PAC 成员的个人成长;(2)PAC 内部参与/社区;(3)PAC 在 LHN 中的参与和存在;(4)参与 LHN 的当地机构参与;以及(5)PAC 成员提供的有形资源/产品。 结论 患者在 LHN 中的参与,如 ICN,对有意义地塑造和共同生产医疗保健系统具有重要作用,但参与的价值被低估,并被二分法概念化(如参与或不参与)。重新定义患者/PAC 成功参与的概念对于研究、支持和了解患者可持续成功参与的机制至关重要。为患者在 LHN 中的成功参与制定一个现代的、多维度的定义,可以支持增加 PAC 中代表性不足的声音、衡量和跟踪成功的多维度患者参与,以及研究成功的患者参与如何影响患者和 LHN 的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Envisioning public health as a learning health system Thanks to our peer reviewers Learning health systems to implement chronic disease prevention programs: A novel framework and perspectives from an Australian health service The translation-to-policy learning cycle to improve public health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1