Madeleine Huwe, Becky Woolf, Jennie David, Michael Seid, Shehzad Saeed, Peter Margolis, ImproveCareNow Pediatric IBD Learning Health System
{"title":"Conceptualizing and redefining successful patient engagement in patient advisory councils in learning health networks","authors":"Madeleine Huwe, Becky Woolf, Jennie David, Michael Seid, Shehzad Saeed, Peter Margolis, ImproveCareNow Pediatric IBD Learning Health System","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Patient engagement has historically referenced engagement in one's healthcare, with more recent definitions expanding patient engagement to encompass patient advocacy work in Learning Health Networks (LHNs). Efforts to conceptualize and define what patient engagement means—and what <i>successful</i> patient engagement means—are, however, lacking and a barrier to meaningful and sustainable patient engagement via patient advisory councils (PACs) across LHNs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Several co-authors (Madeleine Huwe, Becky Woolf, Jennie David) are former ImproveCareNow (ICN) PAC members, and we integrate a narrative review of the extant literature and a case study of our lived experiences as former ICN PAC members. We present nuanced themes of successful patient engagement from our lived experiences on ICN's PAC, with illustrative quotes from other PAC members, and then propose themes and metrics to consider in patient engagement across LHNs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Successful patient engagement in our experiences with ICN's PAC reaches beyond the “levels of engagement” previously described in the literature. We posit that our successful patient/PAC engagement experiences with ICN represent key mechanisms that could be applied across LHNs, including (1) personal growth for PAC members, (2) PAC internal engagement/community, (3) PAC engagement and presence within the LHN, (4) local institutional engagement for those who participate in the LHN, and (5) tangible resources/products from PAC members.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Patient engagement in LHNs, like ICN, holds significant power to meaningfully shape and co-produce healthcare systems, and engagement is undervalued and conceptualized dichotomously (eg, engaged or not engaged). Reconceptualizing successful patient/PAC engagement is critical in ongoing efforts to study, support, and understand mechanisms of sustainable and successful patient engagement. Having a modern, multidimensional definition for successful patient engagement in LHNs can support efforts to increase underrepresented voices in PACs, measure and track successful multidimensional patient engagement, and study how successful patient engagement may impact outcomes for patients and LHNs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10377","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Patient engagement has historically referenced engagement in one's healthcare, with more recent definitions expanding patient engagement to encompass patient advocacy work in Learning Health Networks (LHNs). Efforts to conceptualize and define what patient engagement means—and what successful patient engagement means—are, however, lacking and a barrier to meaningful and sustainable patient engagement via patient advisory councils (PACs) across LHNs.
Methods
Several co-authors (Madeleine Huwe, Becky Woolf, Jennie David) are former ImproveCareNow (ICN) PAC members, and we integrate a narrative review of the extant literature and a case study of our lived experiences as former ICN PAC members. We present nuanced themes of successful patient engagement from our lived experiences on ICN's PAC, with illustrative quotes from other PAC members, and then propose themes and metrics to consider in patient engagement across LHNs.
Results
Successful patient engagement in our experiences with ICN's PAC reaches beyond the “levels of engagement” previously described in the literature. We posit that our successful patient/PAC engagement experiences with ICN represent key mechanisms that could be applied across LHNs, including (1) personal growth for PAC members, (2) PAC internal engagement/community, (3) PAC engagement and presence within the LHN, (4) local institutional engagement for those who participate in the LHN, and (5) tangible resources/products from PAC members.
Conclusion
Patient engagement in LHNs, like ICN, holds significant power to meaningfully shape and co-produce healthcare systems, and engagement is undervalued and conceptualized dichotomously (eg, engaged or not engaged). Reconceptualizing successful patient/PAC engagement is critical in ongoing efforts to study, support, and understand mechanisms of sustainable and successful patient engagement. Having a modern, multidimensional definition for successful patient engagement in LHNs can support efforts to increase underrepresented voices in PACs, measure and track successful multidimensional patient engagement, and study how successful patient engagement may impact outcomes for patients and LHNs.