Accounting from below: activists confront outsourcing in a London borough

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 Social Sciences Critical Policy Studies Pub Date : 2021-10-11 DOI:10.1080/19460171.2021.1989006
Chris Hurl
{"title":"Accounting from below: activists confront outsourcing in a London borough","authors":"Chris Hurl","doi":"10.1080/19460171.2021.1989006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Drawing on a case study of Barnet, an outer borough of London (UK), this article discusses the challenges that activists face in making sense of local government in the neoliberal era. With the aim of making things more ‘direct’, ‘open’, and ‘streamlined,’ the borough’s council decided in 2008 to outsource the bulk of its services in two large contracts to the professional service firm Capita Plc. However, contrary to the image of institutional transparency presented, this article demonstrates that the large-scale outsourcing of services has contributed to the emergence of complex contractualized governance arrangements that raise new problems of legibility. Drawing from the methodological insights of Institutional Ethnography, I investigate how generating knowledge about such arrangements has posed a problem for local residents and community groups who have sought to understand the relationships under which their services are designed, financed, and delivered. Through infrastructures of dissent, I explore how local residents have developed strategies for investigating service arrangements, interrogating claims to value and efficiency, and exposing institutional blindspots in service provision. The article concludes by discussing the epistemological problems posed by neoliberal governance arrangements today, and how they raise challenges for those who confront them.","PeriodicalId":51625,"journal":{"name":"Critical Policy Studies","volume":"16 1","pages":"352 - 370"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Policy Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.1989006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing on a case study of Barnet, an outer borough of London (UK), this article discusses the challenges that activists face in making sense of local government in the neoliberal era. With the aim of making things more ‘direct’, ‘open’, and ‘streamlined,’ the borough’s council decided in 2008 to outsource the bulk of its services in two large contracts to the professional service firm Capita Plc. However, contrary to the image of institutional transparency presented, this article demonstrates that the large-scale outsourcing of services has contributed to the emergence of complex contractualized governance arrangements that raise new problems of legibility. Drawing from the methodological insights of Institutional Ethnography, I investigate how generating knowledge about such arrangements has posed a problem for local residents and community groups who have sought to understand the relationships under which their services are designed, financed, and delivered. Through infrastructures of dissent, I explore how local residents have developed strategies for investigating service arrangements, interrogating claims to value and efficiency, and exposing institutional blindspots in service provision. The article concludes by discussing the epistemological problems posed by neoliberal governance arrangements today, and how they raise challenges for those who confront them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自下而上的会计:激进分子在伦敦一个自治市镇面对外包
本文以英国伦敦外区巴尼特为例,探讨了新自由主义时代活动人士在理解地方政府时所面临的挑战。为了让事情变得更“直接”、“开放”和“精简”,2008年,自治市议会决定将其大部分服务外包给专业服务公司Capita Plc。然而,与所呈现的制度透明度的形象相反,本文表明,大规模的服务外包导致了复杂的合同化治理安排的出现,从而引发了新的易读性问题。从制度人种学的方法论见解中,我研究了如何产生关于这种安排的知识,这给当地居民和社区团体带来了一个问题,他们试图了解他们的服务是在这种关系下设计、资助和交付的。通过不同意见的基础设施,我探索了当地居民如何制定策略来调查服务安排,质疑价值和效率的要求,并暴露服务提供中的制度盲点。文章最后讨论了当今新自由主义治理安排所带来的认识论问题,以及它们如何给那些面对它们的人带来挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
The Bolsonaro Government’s 2019 pension reform in Brazil: a policy discourse analysis Reparative public policy Variegated Economies Variegated Economies , by Jamie Peck, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2023, 392pp., hardback: GBP 64.00 paperback and e-book: GBP 19.99 ISBN 978-019-007-693-1 Responsibility and innovation for low waste and circular economy transitions: what roles for households? Public Policy and Indigenous Futures Public Policy and Indigenous Futures , edited by Nikki Moodie and Sarah Maddison, Singapore, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd, 2023, 129 pp., EUR €93.08 (ebook), €109.99 (hardcover), ISBN 978-981-19-9319-0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1