A sequence analysis of organic and conventional food consumers’ visual information acquisition

IF 0.6 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Future of Food: Journal on Food, Agriculture and Society Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI:10.17170/KOBRA-20190506417
Manika Rödiger, Enrique Garcia Moreno-Esteva, M. Janssen, U. Hamm
{"title":"A sequence analysis of organic and conventional food consumers’ visual information acquisition","authors":"Manika Rödiger, Enrique Garcia Moreno-Esteva, M. Janssen, U. Hamm","doi":"10.17170/KOBRA-20190506417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is of significant importance in food marketing to know which pieces of information available during shopping are most relevant to consumers. The visual search behaviour of consumers allows inference on the relevance of information based on what information is acquired and when. It is assumed that price is a major barrier to the purchase of organic food. However, little is known about consumers’ actual acquisition of information on organic food prices. To examine the information acquisition behaviour of consumers buying organic and consumers buying conventional food, a shopping simulation study was run in which participants (n=189) were invited to choose between different unfamiliar organic and conventional product alternatives while wearing eye-tracking glasses. The data were divided into three visual attention phases: orientation phase, comparison phase, and evaluation phase. The information intake in the phases was investigated comparing organic and conventional consumers. Organic consumers acquired less information on conventional prices in the orientation and evaluation phases. It is concluded that for organic consumers, price information is less relevant to making a purchase decision compared to consumers of conventional food. \nData of the article \nFirst received: 07 August 2018 | Last revision received: 30 January 2019 Accepted: 27 March 2019 | Published online: 26 July 2019DOI:10.17170/kobra-20190506417","PeriodicalId":12705,"journal":{"name":"Future of Food: Journal on Food, Agriculture and Society","volume":"7 1","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Food: Journal on Food, Agriculture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17170/KOBRA-20190506417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is of significant importance in food marketing to know which pieces of information available during shopping are most relevant to consumers. The visual search behaviour of consumers allows inference on the relevance of information based on what information is acquired and when. It is assumed that price is a major barrier to the purchase of organic food. However, little is known about consumers’ actual acquisition of information on organic food prices. To examine the information acquisition behaviour of consumers buying organic and consumers buying conventional food, a shopping simulation study was run in which participants (n=189) were invited to choose between different unfamiliar organic and conventional product alternatives while wearing eye-tracking glasses. The data were divided into three visual attention phases: orientation phase, comparison phase, and evaluation phase. The information intake in the phases was investigated comparing organic and conventional consumers. Organic consumers acquired less information on conventional prices in the orientation and evaluation phases. It is concluded that for organic consumers, price information is less relevant to making a purchase decision compared to consumers of conventional food. Data of the article First received: 07 August 2018 | Last revision received: 30 January 2019 Accepted: 27 March 2019 | Published online: 26 July 2019DOI:10.17170/kobra-20190506417
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机食品与常规食品消费者视觉信息获取的序列分析
在食品营销中,了解购物过程中哪些信息与消费者最相关具有重要意义。消费者的视觉搜索行为允许根据获取的信息和时间推断信息的相关性。人们认为价格是购买有机食品的主要障碍。然而,人们对消费者实际获得的有机食品价格信息知之甚少。为了研究购买有机食品的消费者和购买传统食品的消费者的信息获取行为,进行了一项购物模拟研究,参与者(n=189)被邀请在戴着眼动追踪眼镜的情况下,在不同的陌生有机和传统产品替代品之间进行选择。数据分为三个视觉注意阶段:定向阶段、比较阶段和评估阶段。通过比较有机消费者和传统消费者,对各阶段的信息摄入进行了调查。有机消费者在定位和评估阶段获得的关于传统价格的信息较少。结果表明,与传统食品的消费者相比,有机食品的消费者的价格信息与购买决策的相关性较小。文章数据首次收到:2018年8月7日|最后一次修订收到:2019年1月30日接受:2019年3月27日|在线发布:2019年7月26日DOI:10.17170/kobra-20190506417
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Future of Food: Journal on Food, Agriculture & Society (FOFJ) was founded in 2012 in order to provide a platform for scientific debate on agriculture and food-related themes with the goal of a sustainable future for people and planet. The journal is aimed at contributing to debates on sustainable food production and consumption, and is most interested in tackling the most important challenges to the global agri-food system, such as hunger and malnutrition, depletion of natural resources, climate change, threats to biodiversity, and inequity in the agrarian sphere. The journal understands itself as a multi-disciplinary effort and is especially designed to foster interaction between different disciplines and approaches. Hence it invites inputs from social and natural sciences, arts and humanities, academics and scholar-activists, civil society and agroecology practitioners. The journal is attempting to reach its goal by providing open access to readers and allowing contributions without submission fees or publication fees. Contributors are kindly asked to keep in mind that the journal is a non-profit endeavour and that staff time is limited. The journal cannot provide guarantees or financial support for any submission and cannot accept legal responsibility for any stage of the submission process. The Editorial Board is made up by a range of international experts who devote time and energy to peer review and its members deserve gratitude and recognition for their excellent work. All communication between authors, editors, reviewers and editorial staff is conducted in an atmosphere of mutual respect. The journal will not tolerate racism, religious, ethnic and national chauvinism, misogynous and hate language and reserves the right to bar anyone who disrespects these principles from using the platform.
期刊最新文献
Financial Inclusion in the Global South: An Analysis of Index-Based Agricultural Insurance and Farmer Food Security in India Finding alternatives: Canadian attitudes towards novel foods in support of sustainable agriculture Continuity and changes in food consumption pattern among Tibetan refugee community in India Demand for selected plant-based protein among the staff of a tertiary institution in Nigeria: An investigation of the aspects affecting non-Muslim customers’ purchase intention of halal food products in Jakarta, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1