Chintan Shah, G. Jackson, A. Sarwar, P. Mandava, Fariha Jamal
{"title":"Treatment Patterns in Essential Tremor: A Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Chintan Shah, G. Jackson, A. Sarwar, P. Mandava, Fariha Jamal","doi":"10.5334/tohm.682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although first line therapies for essential tremor have been identified from small clinical trials, responses are variable. We conducted a survey of tremor management in a large sample of ET cases. Methods: The Movement Disorders Clinical Case Registry within a US Veterans Health Administration medical center was used to identify 1468 patients with ET. Results: Of 1468 charts reviewed, 1074 (73.19%) met criteria for ET with characterization of temporal course and treatment; 291/1074 subjects (27.1%) did not receive any treatment. Almost half (500/1074; 46.6%) of the patients received monotherapy, 196/1074 (18.2%) two, 66/1074 (6.1%) three, and 21/1074 (2.0%) four or more medications. Of all prescriptions, primidone was the most used (546/1172; 46.6%), followed by propranolol (419; 35.8%), topiramate (122; 10.4%) and gabapentin (35; 3.0%). Medication response was available for a total of 1030 prescriptions, of which 138 (13.4%) were discontinued due to side effects; 180 (17.5%) prescriptions were ineffective. Furthermore, 52/1074 patients (4.8%) were treated with botulinum toxin injections and 41/1074 (3.8%) underwent deep brain stimulation surgery. Discussion: Our data suggest that more widespread recognition of limitations underlying conventional approaches, as well as increased referrals for nonpharmacological therapies, may be necessary to achieve improved outcomes in ET populations.","PeriodicalId":23317,"journal":{"name":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Background: Although first line therapies for essential tremor have been identified from small clinical trials, responses are variable. We conducted a survey of tremor management in a large sample of ET cases. Methods: The Movement Disorders Clinical Case Registry within a US Veterans Health Administration medical center was used to identify 1468 patients with ET. Results: Of 1468 charts reviewed, 1074 (73.19%) met criteria for ET with characterization of temporal course and treatment; 291/1074 subjects (27.1%) did not receive any treatment. Almost half (500/1074; 46.6%) of the patients received monotherapy, 196/1074 (18.2%) two, 66/1074 (6.1%) three, and 21/1074 (2.0%) four or more medications. Of all prescriptions, primidone was the most used (546/1172; 46.6%), followed by propranolol (419; 35.8%), topiramate (122; 10.4%) and gabapentin (35; 3.0%). Medication response was available for a total of 1030 prescriptions, of which 138 (13.4%) were discontinued due to side effects; 180 (17.5%) prescriptions were ineffective. Furthermore, 52/1074 patients (4.8%) were treated with botulinum toxin injections and 41/1074 (3.8%) underwent deep brain stimulation surgery. Discussion: Our data suggest that more widespread recognition of limitations underlying conventional approaches, as well as increased referrals for nonpharmacological therapies, may be necessary to achieve improved outcomes in ET populations.