The Institutionalization of Memory Politics in a Hybrid Political Regime: The Figure, Legacy, and Appropriation of György Lukács in Hungary between 2010 and 2020

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1215/0094033x-10459982
György Túry
{"title":"The Institutionalization of Memory Politics in a Hybrid Political Regime: The Figure, Legacy, and Appropriation of György Lukács in Hungary between 2010 and 2020","authors":"György Túry","doi":"10.1215/0094033x-10459982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the political reception of György Lukács and his students in Viktor Orbán’s Hungary between 2010 and 2020. It argues that Orbán’s autocratic regime has sought to systematically delegitimize Lukács’s person, thought, and legacy in an attempt to consolidate power and usher in a “new cultural era.” The article analyzes three pivotal moments in the Orbán regime’s struggle against Lukács: a 2011 lawsuit accusing Lukács’s intellectual heirs of embezzling research money; a media takedown of Lukács, resulting in the removal of his statue from Budapest in 2017; and the closure of the Lukács Archives in 2018. The article shows that, rather than engage with Lukács’s thought and ideology, the Orbán regime has treated Lukács as an unwanted cultural symbol. It concludes by warning that Orbán’s treatment of Lukács is exemplary of “illiberal democracies” across the world: when ideology is deemed meaningless, culture becomes directly subjugated to political power.","PeriodicalId":46595,"journal":{"name":"NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033x-10459982","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the political reception of György Lukács and his students in Viktor Orbán’s Hungary between 2010 and 2020. It argues that Orbán’s autocratic regime has sought to systematically delegitimize Lukács’s person, thought, and legacy in an attempt to consolidate power and usher in a “new cultural era.” The article analyzes three pivotal moments in the Orbán regime’s struggle against Lukács: a 2011 lawsuit accusing Lukács’s intellectual heirs of embezzling research money; a media takedown of Lukács, resulting in the removal of his statue from Budapest in 2017; and the closure of the Lukács Archives in 2018. The article shows that, rather than engage with Lukács’s thought and ideology, the Orbán regime has treated Lukács as an unwanted cultural symbol. It concludes by warning that Orbán’s treatment of Lukács is exemplary of “illiberal democracies” across the world: when ideology is deemed meaningless, culture becomes directly subjugated to political power.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合政治体制下记忆政治的制度化:2010 - 2020年匈牙利György Lukács的形象、遗产与挪用
本文考察了2010年至2020年期间,György Lukács及其学生在Viktor Orbán统治下的匈牙利的政治接受情况。文章认为,Orbán的独裁政权试图系统性地将Lukács的个人、思想和遗产非法化,以巩固权力并开创一个“新文化时代”。本文分析了Orbán政权与Lukács斗争中的三个关键时刻:2011年指控Lukács知识产权继承人侵吞研究经费的诉讼;媒体关闭了Lukács,导致他的雕像于2017年从布达佩斯移除;以及2018年Lukács档案馆的关闭。这篇文章表明,Orbán政权并没有接受Lukács的思想和意识形态,而是把Lukács当作一个不受欢迎的文化符号。文章最后警告说,Orbán对待Lukács的方式是全世界“非自由民主”的典范:当意识形态被认为毫无意义时,文化就会直接屈从于政治权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE
NEW GERMAN CRITIQUE LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Widely considered the top journal in its field, New German Critique is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on twentieth- and twenty-first-century German studies and publishes on a wide array of subjects, including literature, film, and media; literary theory and cultural studies; Holocaust studies; art and architecture; political and social theory; and philosophy. Established in the early 1970s, the journal has played a significant role in introducing U.S. readers to Frankfurt School thinkers and remains an important forum for debate in the humanities.
期刊最新文献
Queer Spectrality and the Hope of Heterolingual Address The Sociability of Narrative: Freedom, Vulnerability, and Mediation in the Intercultural Novel Coming to Terms with the Future Undisciplined Knowledge: Intersectional Black European Studies Where Next for New German Critique?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1