Research Unbundling and COVID-19: Will Europe’s Capital Markets Recovery Package Help?

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Investing Pub Date : 2021-10-08 DOI:10.3905/joi.2021.1.205
Michael Bender, Tino Cestonaro, P. Gomber, Jascha-Alexander Koch
{"title":"Research Unbundling and COVID-19: Will Europe’s Capital Markets Recovery Package Help?","authors":"Michael Bender, Tino Cestonaro, P. Gomber, Jascha-Alexander Koch","doi":"10.3905/joi.2021.1.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2018, the European financial regulation MiFID II introduced research unbundling rules that banned the bundling of research payments with execution costs. The aim of research unbundling is to increase transparency for investors and to avoid agency conflicts. Opponents argue that research unbundling reduces small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) research and, thereby, SMEs’ financing opportunities because this research can no longer be cross-subsidized by research fees paid for larger companies. The outbreak of COVID-19 and its impact on financial markets fueled intense discussions on rebundling for SMEs. Consequently, in February 2021, the European Commission adopted a Capital Markets Recovery Package that allows bundled research for SMEs below a market capitalization of EUR 1 billion. Against this backdrop, the authors conducted a survey among European market participants to investigate changes in research services due to research unbundling and the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, they examine market participants’ views on the expected effects and improvements of the option to rebundle SME research as provided by the recovery package.","PeriodicalId":45504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2021.1.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2018, the European financial regulation MiFID II introduced research unbundling rules that banned the bundling of research payments with execution costs. The aim of research unbundling is to increase transparency for investors and to avoid agency conflicts. Opponents argue that research unbundling reduces small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) research and, thereby, SMEs’ financing opportunities because this research can no longer be cross-subsidized by research fees paid for larger companies. The outbreak of COVID-19 and its impact on financial markets fueled intense discussions on rebundling for SMEs. Consequently, in February 2021, the European Commission adopted a Capital Markets Recovery Package that allows bundled research for SMEs below a market capitalization of EUR 1 billion. Against this backdrop, the authors conducted a survey among European market participants to investigate changes in research services due to research unbundling and the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, they examine market participants’ views on the expected effects and improvements of the option to rebundle SME research as provided by the recovery package.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究解绑与新冠肺炎:欧洲资本市场复苏计划会有帮助吗?
2018年,欧洲金融监管机构MiFID II引入了研究拆分规则,禁止将研究付款与执行成本捆绑在一起。研究分拆的目的是提高投资者的透明度,避免机构冲突。反对者认为,研究分拆减少了中小型企业的研究,从而减少了中小企业的融资机会,因为这项研究不能再由大公司支付的研究费交叉补贴。新冠肺炎的爆发及其对金融市场的影响引发了关于中小企业重组的激烈讨论。因此,2021年2月,欧盟委员会通过了一项资本市场复苏计划,允许对市值低于10亿欧元的中小企业进行捆绑研究。在此背景下,作者对欧洲市场参与者进行了一项调查,以调查研究分拆和新冠肺炎大流行导致的研究服务变化。此外,他们还考察了市场参与者对复苏方案提供的重新捆绑中小企业研究的预期效果和改进的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investing
Journal of Investing BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
A New Global Portfolio Weighting Strategy Based on Cointegration Methods “I Have Never Seen a Bad Backtest”: Modeling Reality in Quantitative Investing Predicting Market Risk Premiums with Historical Patterns How Many Securities Should an Active Manager hold? What Makes the Dollar Cost Averaging Strategy So Popular Today? A Critical Review of the Benefits and Risks of a Controversial Investment Scheme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1