Feminist pedagogy through the small fieldnote

Tarini Bedi, Aditi Aggarwal, Josephine Chaet, Lakshita Malik
{"title":"Feminist pedagogy through the small fieldnote","authors":"Tarini Bedi,&nbsp;Aditi Aggarwal,&nbsp;Josephine Chaet,&nbsp;Lakshita Malik","doi":"10.1002/fea2.12068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This collectively written essay reflects collaborations between three graduate students and their dissertation advisor. We turn to inspirations like Zora Neale Hurston to make our fieldnotes central to collective writing, thinking and translation across language and discursive traditions. We use <i>small fieldnote</i> in a subversive sense to illustrate a feminist mode of this pedagogical exercise and to refuse foreclosure of our analysis. We push back against the burden of working with complete pieces of writing, and the anthropological commitment to the thickness of description. Anthropological pedagogy conventionally attributes to thick description and completeness, not just scholarly superiority but also a moral one. Using a feminist pedagogical approach that centers the small as possibility troubles presumptions of conventional anthropological pedagogy. Instead, we picked notes from one or two ethnographic encounters or a single day of fieldwork to experiment collectively with where they could lead us. The essay that has resulted from this collective feminist classroom is what we see as a <i>feminist-dividual</i> piece of pedagogy and writing. We anticipate that it will provide others a hopeful way to begin and sustain intellectual collaborations and writing across scholarly generations by celebrating the potential of small, incomplete, and otherwise uncelebrated pieces of writing.</p>","PeriodicalId":73022,"journal":{"name":"Feminist anthropology","volume":"2 2","pages":"199-223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fea2.12068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This collectively written essay reflects collaborations between three graduate students and their dissertation advisor. We turn to inspirations like Zora Neale Hurston to make our fieldnotes central to collective writing, thinking and translation across language and discursive traditions. We use small fieldnote in a subversive sense to illustrate a feminist mode of this pedagogical exercise and to refuse foreclosure of our analysis. We push back against the burden of working with complete pieces of writing, and the anthropological commitment to the thickness of description. Anthropological pedagogy conventionally attributes to thick description and completeness, not just scholarly superiority but also a moral one. Using a feminist pedagogical approach that centers the small as possibility troubles presumptions of conventional anthropological pedagogy. Instead, we picked notes from one or two ethnographic encounters or a single day of fieldwork to experiment collectively with where they could lead us. The essay that has resulted from this collective feminist classroom is what we see as a feminist-dividual piece of pedagogy and writing. We anticipate that it will provide others a hopeful way to begin and sustain intellectual collaborations and writing across scholarly generations by celebrating the potential of small, incomplete, and otherwise uncelebrated pieces of writing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从田野笔记看女权主义教育学
这篇集体撰写的论文反映了三位研究生和他们的论文导师之间的合作。我们转向像佐拉·尼尔·赫斯顿这样的灵感,使我们的田野笔记成为跨语言和话语传统的集体写作、思考和翻译的中心。我们在颠覆性的意义上使用小的田野笔记来说明这种教学练习的女权主义模式,并拒绝取消我们的分析。我们不愿承担研究完整作品的重担,也不愿承担人类学对描述厚度的承诺。人类学教育学传统上归因于厚实的描述和完整性,不仅是学术上的优势,也是道德上的优势。运用以可能性小为中心的女性主义教学方法,挑战了传统人类学教育学的假设。相反,我们从一两次人种学接触或一天的田野工作中挑选笔记,集体实验它们能把我们带到哪里。这篇由集体女权主义课堂产生的文章就是我们所看到的女权主义-个人的教学和写作作品。我们期待,它将为其他人提供一种充满希望的方式,通过庆祝小的、不完整的和其他不知名的作品的潜力,开始和维持学术代际的智力合作和写作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Finding Wang Tonghui: The life and after‐life of a pioneer female Chinese anthropologist Gender violence, emotion, and the state symposium commentary The politics of emotion and domestic violence in northern Vietnam Introduction to the gender violence, emotion, and the state symposium
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1