{"title":"Evolution, roots and influence of the rural entrepreneurship literature: a bibliometric account","authors":"Ehsan Masoomi, K. Rezaei-Moghaddam, A. Teixeira","doi":"10.1108/jec-04-2022-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to investigate the evolution, roots and influence of the rural entrepreneurship literature.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing a bibliometric exercise, the analysis starts with investigation of studies on entrepreneurship and gathering all (772) articles on rural entrepreneurship (from 1981 to 2020) found in both Scopus and Web of Science up to 15 August 2020. Citation analysis of the references/citations of 755 articles are listed in the abstract database, generating a citation database involving 46,432 references/citations. This paper considers 635 (out of the 772) articles on rural entrepreneurship (i.e. articles cited in one or more studies), generating a database of 10,767 studies influenced by the rural entrepreneurship literature.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study discovers that the relative importance of rural entrepreneurship within the entrepreneurship literature has increased in the last few years, but rural entrepreneurship remains a European concern; the most frequently addressed topics include growth and development, institutional frameworks and governance and rurality, with theory building being rather understudied. Most of the studies on rural entrepreneurship are empirical, involving mainly qualitative analyses and targeting high income countries; rural entrepreneurship is rooted in the fields of economics and entrepreneurship and is relatively self-referential.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides a comprehensive and updated investigation of evolution of the rural entrepreneurship literature. The assessment of the literature’s scientific roots of rural entrepreneurship had not yet been tackled before. To the best of the author’s knowledge this study can be considered as the first effort for identifying the scientific influence of the rural entrepreneurship literature.\n","PeriodicalId":46489,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enterprising Communities-People and Places in the Global Economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enterprising Communities-People and Places in the Global Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-04-2022-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to investigate the evolution, roots and influence of the rural entrepreneurship literature.
Design/methodology/approach
Using a bibliometric exercise, the analysis starts with investigation of studies on entrepreneurship and gathering all (772) articles on rural entrepreneurship (from 1981 to 2020) found in both Scopus and Web of Science up to 15 August 2020. Citation analysis of the references/citations of 755 articles are listed in the abstract database, generating a citation database involving 46,432 references/citations. This paper considers 635 (out of the 772) articles on rural entrepreneurship (i.e. articles cited in one or more studies), generating a database of 10,767 studies influenced by the rural entrepreneurship literature.
Findings
This study discovers that the relative importance of rural entrepreneurship within the entrepreneurship literature has increased in the last few years, but rural entrepreneurship remains a European concern; the most frequently addressed topics include growth and development, institutional frameworks and governance and rurality, with theory building being rather understudied. Most of the studies on rural entrepreneurship are empirical, involving mainly qualitative analyses and targeting high income countries; rural entrepreneurship is rooted in the fields of economics and entrepreneurship and is relatively self-referential.
Originality/value
This study provides a comprehensive and updated investigation of evolution of the rural entrepreneurship literature. The assessment of the literature’s scientific roots of rural entrepreneurship had not yet been tackled before. To the best of the author’s knowledge this study can be considered as the first effort for identifying the scientific influence of the rural entrepreneurship literature.
目的探讨农村创业文献的演变、根源及其影响。设计/方法/方法采用文献计量学方法,分析从对创业研究的调查开始,并收集截至2020年8月15日在Scopus和Web of Science中找到的所有(772)篇关于农村创业的文章(1981年至2020年)。摘要数据库中收录了755篇文献的引文分析,生成了46432篇文献/引文的引文数据库。本文考虑了(772篇中的)635篇关于农村创业的文章(即在一项或多项研究中被引用的文章),生成了一个受农村创业文献影响的10,767篇研究的数据库。本研究发现,在过去几年中,创业文献中农村创业的相对重要性有所增加,但农村创业仍然是欧洲关注的问题;最常讨论的主题包括增长与发展、制度框架、治理和农村问题,而对理论建设的研究却相当不足。大多数关于农村创业的研究都是经验性的,主要涉及定性分析,并针对高收入国家;农村创业根植于经济学和创业学领域,具有相对的自我参照性。原创性/价值本研究对农村创业文献的演变进行了全面和最新的调查。对文献中关于农村创业的科学根源的评估,以前还没有被解决过。据笔者所知,这项研究可以被认为是第一次尝试识别农村创业文献的科学影响。