The durability of oral diabetic medications: Time to A1c baseline and a review of common oral medications used by the primary care provider.

Lavanya Cherukuri, Michael S Smith, J. Tayek
{"title":"The durability of oral diabetic medications: Time to A1c baseline and a review of common oral medications used by the primary care provider.","authors":"Lavanya Cherukuri, Michael S Smith, J. Tayek","doi":"10.31038/edmj.2018232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nCost of generic medications has risen more in the past few years than any other time in history. While medical insurance covers much of these costs, health care professionals can better provide medications that have the longest duration of action when compared to placebo-treated controls. This will save health care costs and improve prescribing accuracy.\n\n\nMethods\nPapers in PubMed were identified with keywords placebo. The study must be at least 2 years in length to evaluate the change in A1c over time. The primary endpoint was time to A1c neutrality (return of A1c to baseline at a maximum dose of single oral agent). A medication would be considered at neutrality if the 95% CI crossed baseline. Time to neutrality was averaged for each medication within the class and each summarized for class effect.\n\n\nResults\nEffective therapy for the DPP-4 and sulfonylurea classes of medications are 3-4 years as compared to a 5-year time to A1c neutrality for metformin usage. In comparison, the projected time to A1c neutrality was approximately 6-8 years for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. While only a few studies have been published in the SGLT-2 class of medication, the time to A1c neutrality was also 6-8 years with Canagliflozin and full dosage of Empagliflozin.\n\n\nConclusion\nMetformin appears to have a 5-year duration of effect before the A1c returns to baseline. The sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors class of medications have one of the shortest durability which ranges between 3.3 to 4.4 years. In contrast, the SGLT-2 class of medication and the TZD class of medications has a projected time to A1c neutrality from 6-8 years. Diabetic duration of therapy as compared to placebo should be listed with those medications tested so the provider can choose wisely.","PeriodicalId":72911,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal","volume":"2 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31038/edmj.2018232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Introduction Cost of generic medications has risen more in the past few years than any other time in history. While medical insurance covers much of these costs, health care professionals can better provide medications that have the longest duration of action when compared to placebo-treated controls. This will save health care costs and improve prescribing accuracy. Methods Papers in PubMed were identified with keywords placebo. The study must be at least 2 years in length to evaluate the change in A1c over time. The primary endpoint was time to A1c neutrality (return of A1c to baseline at a maximum dose of single oral agent). A medication would be considered at neutrality if the 95% CI crossed baseline. Time to neutrality was averaged for each medication within the class and each summarized for class effect. Results Effective therapy for the DPP-4 and sulfonylurea classes of medications are 3-4 years as compared to a 5-year time to A1c neutrality for metformin usage. In comparison, the projected time to A1c neutrality was approximately 6-8 years for rosiglitazone and pioglitazone. While only a few studies have been published in the SGLT-2 class of medication, the time to A1c neutrality was also 6-8 years with Canagliflozin and full dosage of Empagliflozin. Conclusion Metformin appears to have a 5-year duration of effect before the A1c returns to baseline. The sulfonylureas and DPP-4 inhibitors class of medications have one of the shortest durability which ranges between 3.3 to 4.4 years. In contrast, the SGLT-2 class of medication and the TZD class of medications has a projected time to A1c neutrality from 6-8 years. Diabetic duration of therapy as compared to placebo should be listed with those medications tested so the provider can choose wisely.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病口服药物的持久性:A1c基线的时间和初级保健提供者使用的常见口服药物的回顾。
引言在过去的几年里,非专利药物的成本比历史上任何时候都要高。虽然医疗保险涵盖了大部分费用,但与安慰剂治疗的对照组相比,医疗保健专业人员可以更好地提供起效时间最长的药物。这将节省医疗费用并提高处方的准确性。方法PubMed的论文以安慰剂为关键词进行检索。该研究必须至少持续2年,以评估A1c随时间的变化。主要终点是A1c中性的时间(在单次口服制剂的最大剂量下A1c恢复到基线)。如果95%置信区间超过基线,则认为药物为中性。对班内每种药物的中性时间进行平均,并对每种药物进行分类效果总结。结果DPP-4和磺酰脲类药物的有效治疗时间为3-4年,而二甲双胍的A1c中性使用时间为5年。相比之下,罗格列酮和吡格列酮达到A1c中性的预计时间约为6-8年。虽然只有少数研究发表在SGLT-2类药物中,但使用加格列净和全剂量恩帕列嗪,A1c中性的时间也为6-8年。结论二甲双胍在A1c恢复到基线之前似乎有5年的有效期。磺酰脲类和DPP-4抑制剂类药物的耐用性最短,在3.3至4.4年之间。相比之下,SGLT-2类药物和TZD类药物的A1c中性预计时间为6-8年。与安慰剂相比,糖尿病治疗的持续时间应与测试的药物一起列出,以便提供者能够明智地选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pattern of Presentation of Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus Among Sudanese Patients The Role of Endocrine Mediators in the Neurodegeneration and Synaptic Dysfunction of Depressive Illness In their Own Language: Communicating Health to Boost Compliance for Weight Loss and Diabetes Modifiable Risk Factors and the Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Syndrome among Women with and without a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: An Ambidirectional Cohort Study from Pakistan Neuroprotective Effects of a Serotonin Receptor Peptide Following Sham vs. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Zucker Rat.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1