Haptic feedback during virtual reality training significantly improves First-Year orthopedic resident performance at tibia drilling: a randomized trial

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Current Orthopaedic Practice Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI:10.1097/BCO.0000000000001223
A. Kanakamedala, John F. Dankert, Rown Parola, K. Egol, V. Aggarwal, Claudette M. Lajam
{"title":"Haptic feedback during virtual reality training significantly improves First-Year orthopedic resident performance at tibia drilling: a randomized trial","authors":"A. Kanakamedala, John F. Dankert, Rown Parola, K. Egol, V. Aggarwal, Claudette M. Lajam","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Few studies have investigated whether haptic feedback improves the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) simulation. This study aimed to determine whether new orthopedic surgery residents trained on haptic feedback-enabled VR performed basic drilling better than residents who had trained on VR without haptic feedback. Methods: Fourteen first-year orthopedic surgery residents were enrolled and randomized into “haptic” or “non-haptic” groups and blinded to study goals and randomization. Residents participated in a VR tibia drilling simulation with haptic feedback either turned on or off and then performed a plastic resin tibia model drilling session where overdrill depth was measured by two raters blinded to study groups. Questionnaires were completed before and after the hands-on sessions with responses on a five-point Likert scale. Results: There were no significant differences in demographics between groups. Overdrill depth during the first trial was significantly less in the haptic group than the non-haptic group (3.9 mm vs. 6.0 mm, P=0.005). Subsequent trials showed no significant difference in mean overdrill depth between groups (P>0.05). Haptic group participants reported higher confidence in the safe use of surgical tools (4 vs. 3, P<0.01) and more simulation realism (4 vs. 3, P<0.01). Conclusion: VR training with haptic feedback significantly improves initial performance during use of a surgical drill through a tibia model compared to VR training without haptic feedback in first year orthopedic residents. The addition of haptic feedback also increases the perceived value, realism, and enjoyment of VR simulation. Level of Evidence: Level II.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"251 - 256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Few studies have investigated whether haptic feedback improves the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) simulation. This study aimed to determine whether new orthopedic surgery residents trained on haptic feedback-enabled VR performed basic drilling better than residents who had trained on VR without haptic feedback. Methods: Fourteen first-year orthopedic surgery residents were enrolled and randomized into “haptic” or “non-haptic” groups and blinded to study goals and randomization. Residents participated in a VR tibia drilling simulation with haptic feedback either turned on or off and then performed a plastic resin tibia model drilling session where overdrill depth was measured by two raters blinded to study groups. Questionnaires were completed before and after the hands-on sessions with responses on a five-point Likert scale. Results: There were no significant differences in demographics between groups. Overdrill depth during the first trial was significantly less in the haptic group than the non-haptic group (3.9 mm vs. 6.0 mm, P=0.005). Subsequent trials showed no significant difference in mean overdrill depth between groups (P>0.05). Haptic group participants reported higher confidence in the safe use of surgical tools (4 vs. 3, P<0.01) and more simulation realism (4 vs. 3, P<0.01). Conclusion: VR training with haptic feedback significantly improves initial performance during use of a surgical drill through a tibia model compared to VR training without haptic feedback in first year orthopedic residents. The addition of haptic feedback also increases the perceived value, realism, and enjoyment of VR simulation. Level of Evidence: Level II.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟现实训练中的触觉反馈显著提高第一年骨科住院医师胫骨钻孔的表现:一项随机试验
背景:很少有研究调查触觉反馈是否能提高虚拟现实(VR)模拟的有效性。这项研究旨在确定接受触觉反馈VR训练的新骨科住院医师是否比接受无触觉反馈VR培训的住院医师更好地进行基础训练。方法:14名骨科一年级住院患者被纳入并随机分为“触觉”组或“非触觉”组,对研究目标和随机分组不知情。居民参与了VR胫骨钻孔模拟,打开或关闭触觉反馈,然后进行塑料树脂胫骨模型钻孔,由两名对研究组不知情的评分员测量过钻深度。问卷调查是在实践环节前后完成的,回答采用Likert五分制。结果:两组之间的人口统计学没有显著差异。在第一次试验中,触觉组的过度填充深度明显小于非触觉组(3.9 mm对6.0 mm,P=0.005)。随后的试验显示,各组之间的平均过度填充深度没有显著差异(P>0.05)。触觉组参与者对手术工具的安全使用有更高的信心(4对3,P<0.01),模拟逼真度更高(4对三,P<0.01)。结论:在骨科一年级住院医师中,与没有触觉反馈的VR训练相比,有触觉反馈的虚拟现实训练显著提高了通过胫骨模型使用手术钻头的初始性能。触觉反馈的加入也增加了VR模拟的感知价值、真实感和乐趣。证据级别:二级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning review of hand surgery literature Jumpy stump syndrome treated by targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR): a case report and review of the literature Impact of COVID-19 on total hip arthroplasty: results from California state inpatient database Osteotomy via the prone transpsoas approach for lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine Orthopaedic surgery residency program ranking and the current state of leadership: what are the characteristics of the leaders in the “Top-tier” programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1