A difficult journey from enactment to implementation of local content policy: instigating factors and accountability mechanisms for achieving sustainable development

IF 3.9 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Applied Accounting Research Pub Date : 2023-07-04 DOI:10.1108/jaar-02-2023-0043
L. A. Tetteh, Cletus Agyenim-Boateng, S. Simpson
{"title":"A difficult journey from enactment to implementation of local content policy: instigating factors and accountability mechanisms for achieving sustainable development","authors":"L. A. Tetteh, Cletus Agyenim-Boateng, S. Simpson","doi":"10.1108/jaar-02-2023-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe study examines the instigating factors behind the development of the local content (LC) policy in Ghana and it further investigates the accountability mechanisms that drive the LC policy implementation to promote sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachThe study reports on a series of interviews with key actors using Institutional Theory and the application of Bovens’ (2010) Global Accountability Framework as a lens for discussion and interpretation of results.FindingsThe results reveal that two forces instigated LC policy enactment. One is external funding pressure from the Norwegian government and the World Bank. The other is the government’s engagement of Civil Society Organisations and other internal stakeholders to justify its activities and missions to signal adherence to impartiality, neutrality, and, to a lesser extent, solidarity. The analysis also reveals tensions in how accountability legitimacy relates to implementation of the LC policy. The study further discovers that while participation, transparency, monitoring, and evaluation are frequently invoked as de jure institutional legitimacy in oil and gas contracts, actual practices follow normative (de facto) institutionalism rather than what the LC policy law provides.Research limitations/implicationsThe interview had a relatively small number of participants, which can be argued to affect the study’s validity. Nevertheless, given the data saturation effect and the breadth of the data obtained from the respondents, this study represents a significant advancement in LC policy enactment knowledge, implementation mechanisms and enforcement in an emerging O&G industry.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study suggest that future policy development in emerging economies should involve detailed consultations to increase decision-maker knowledge, process transparency and expectations. This will improve implementation and reduce stakeholder tension, conflict and mistrust.Originality/valueThe findings of this study build on earlier investigations into legitimacy, accountability and impression management in and outside the O&G sector. Also, the findings reveal the legitimising tactics used by O&G actors to promote local content sustainable development targets.","PeriodicalId":46321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-02-2023-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe study examines the instigating factors behind the development of the local content (LC) policy in Ghana and it further investigates the accountability mechanisms that drive the LC policy implementation to promote sustainable development.Design/methodology/approachThe study reports on a series of interviews with key actors using Institutional Theory and the application of Bovens’ (2010) Global Accountability Framework as a lens for discussion and interpretation of results.FindingsThe results reveal that two forces instigated LC policy enactment. One is external funding pressure from the Norwegian government and the World Bank. The other is the government’s engagement of Civil Society Organisations and other internal stakeholders to justify its activities and missions to signal adherence to impartiality, neutrality, and, to a lesser extent, solidarity. The analysis also reveals tensions in how accountability legitimacy relates to implementation of the LC policy. The study further discovers that while participation, transparency, monitoring, and evaluation are frequently invoked as de jure institutional legitimacy in oil and gas contracts, actual practices follow normative (de facto) institutionalism rather than what the LC policy law provides.Research limitations/implicationsThe interview had a relatively small number of participants, which can be argued to affect the study’s validity. Nevertheless, given the data saturation effect and the breadth of the data obtained from the respondents, this study represents a significant advancement in LC policy enactment knowledge, implementation mechanisms and enforcement in an emerging O&G industry.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study suggest that future policy development in emerging economies should involve detailed consultations to increase decision-maker knowledge, process transparency and expectations. This will improve implementation and reduce stakeholder tension, conflict and mistrust.Originality/valueThe findings of this study build on earlier investigations into legitimacy, accountability and impression management in and outside the O&G sector. Also, the findings reveal the legitimising tactics used by O&G actors to promote local content sustainable development targets.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从制定到执行地方内容政策的艰难历程:实现可持续发展的煽动因素和问责机制
本研究探讨了加纳本地内容(LC)政策制定背后的激励因素,并进一步探讨了推动LC政策实施以促进可持续发展的问责机制。设计/方法/方法该研究报告了一系列对关键参与者的访谈,使用制度理论和Bovens(2010)的全球问责框架作为讨论和解释结果的镜头。研究结果表明,两股力量推动了LC政策的制定。一个是来自挪威政府和世界银行的外部资金压力。另一个是政府与民间社会组织和其他内部利益相关者的接触,以证明其活动和使命的合理性,以表明坚持公正、中立,以及在较小程度上坚持团结。分析还揭示了问责合法性与LC政策实施之间的紧张关系。研究进一步发现,虽然参与、透明度、监测和评估经常被援引为石油和天然气合同中法律上的制度合法性,但实际做法遵循的是规范性(事实上的)制度主义,而不是LC政策法所规定的。研究局限性/启示本次访谈的参与者相对较少,这可能会影响研究的有效性。然而,考虑到数据饱和效应和从受访者那里获得的数据的广度,本研究代表了新兴油气行业在LC政策制定知识、实施机制和执行方面的重大进步。本研究的结果表明,新兴经济体未来的政策制定应包括详细的磋商,以增加决策者的知识,过程透明度和期望。这将改善实施,减少利益相关者的紧张关系、冲突和不信任。原创性/价值本研究的发现建立在对油气行业内外合法性、问责制和印象管理的早期调查基础之上。此外,调查结果还揭示了油气参与者为促进本地内容可持续发展目标而使用的合法化策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Accounting Research provides a forum for the publication of high quality manuscripts concerning issues relevant to the practice of accounting in a wide variety of contexts. The journal seeks to promote a research agenda that allows academics and practitioners to work together to provide sustainable outcomes in a practice setting. The journal is keen to encourage academic research articles which develop a forum for the discussion of real, practical problems and provide the expertise to allow solutions to these problems to be formed, while also contributing to our theoretical understanding of such issues.
期刊最新文献
Greenhouse gas assurance and carbon emission performance in light of the auditor’s reputation and the country’s development level A mixed methods study of influences on perceived budgeting accuracy in UK universities Corporate culture's influence on the transparency of financial reporting in Iran: an in-depth analysis of readability and tone Earnings quality among private firms: evidence from the ELITE context The impact of board gender diversity on firm performance: does critical mass matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1