Shared Arctic Variable Framework Links Local to Global Observing System Priorities and Requirements

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Arctic Pub Date : 2023-02-08 DOI:10.14430/arctic76429
A. Bradley, H. Eicken, O. Lee, A. Gebruk, Roberta Pirazzinie
{"title":"Shared Arctic Variable Framework Links Local to Global Observing System Priorities and Requirements","authors":"A. Bradley, H. Eicken, O. Lee, A. Gebruk, Roberta Pirazzinie","doi":"10.14430/arctic76429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The geographic settings and interests of diverse groups of rights- and stakeholders figure prominently in the need for internationally coordinated Arctic observing systems. Global and regional observing systems exist to coordinate observations across sectors and national boundaries, leveraging limited resources into widely available observational data and information products. Observing system design and coordination approaches developed for more focused networks at mid- and low latitudes are not necessarily directly applicable in more complex Arctic settings. Requirements for the latter are more demanding because of a greater need for cross-disciplinary and cross-sectoral prioritization and refinement from the local to the pan-Arctic scale, in order to maximize the use of resources in challenging environmental settings. Consideration of Arctic Indigenous Peoples’s observing priorities and needs has emerged as a core tenet of governance and coordination frameworks. We evaluate several different types of observing systems relative to the needs of the Arctic observing community and information users to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each framework. A typology of three approaches emerges from this assessment: “essential variable,” “station model,” and “central question.” We define and assess, against the requirements of Arctic settings, the concept of shared Arctic variables (SAVs) emerging from the Arctic Observing Summit 2020 and prior work by the Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks Road Mapping Task Force. SAVs represent measurable phenomena or processes that are important enough to multiple communities and sectors to make the effort to coordinate observation efforts worthwhile. SAVs align with essential variables as defined, for example, by global observing frameworks, in that they guide coordinated observations across processes that are of interest to multiple sectors. SAVs are responsive to the information needs of Arctic Indigenous Peoples and draw on their capacity to codesign and comanage observing efforts. SAVs are also tailored to accommodate the logistical challenges of Arctic operations and address unique aspects of the Arctic environment, such as the central role of the cryosphere. Specific examples illustrate the flexibility of the SAV framework in reconciling different observational approaches and standards such that the strengths of global and regional observing programs can be adapted to the complex Arctic environment. ","PeriodicalId":55464,"journal":{"name":"Arctic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arctic","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic76429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The geographic settings and interests of diverse groups of rights- and stakeholders figure prominently in the need for internationally coordinated Arctic observing systems. Global and regional observing systems exist to coordinate observations across sectors and national boundaries, leveraging limited resources into widely available observational data and information products. Observing system design and coordination approaches developed for more focused networks at mid- and low latitudes are not necessarily directly applicable in more complex Arctic settings. Requirements for the latter are more demanding because of a greater need for cross-disciplinary and cross-sectoral prioritization and refinement from the local to the pan-Arctic scale, in order to maximize the use of resources in challenging environmental settings. Consideration of Arctic Indigenous Peoples’s observing priorities and needs has emerged as a core tenet of governance and coordination frameworks. We evaluate several different types of observing systems relative to the needs of the Arctic observing community and information users to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each framework. A typology of three approaches emerges from this assessment: “essential variable,” “station model,” and “central question.” We define and assess, against the requirements of Arctic settings, the concept of shared Arctic variables (SAVs) emerging from the Arctic Observing Summit 2020 and prior work by the Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks Road Mapping Task Force. SAVs represent measurable phenomena or processes that are important enough to multiple communities and sectors to make the effort to coordinate observation efforts worthwhile. SAVs align with essential variables as defined, for example, by global observing frameworks, in that they guide coordinated observations across processes that are of interest to multiple sectors. SAVs are responsive to the information needs of Arctic Indigenous Peoples and draw on their capacity to codesign and comanage observing efforts. SAVs are also tailored to accommodate the logistical challenges of Arctic operations and address unique aspects of the Arctic environment, such as the central role of the cryosphere. Specific examples illustrate the flexibility of the SAV framework in reconciling different observational approaches and standards such that the strengths of global and regional observing programs can be adapted to the complex Arctic environment. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共享北极变量框架将地方与全球观测系统的优先事项和要求联系起来
不同权利群体和利益攸关方的地理环境和利益在需要国际协调的北极观测系统方面占有突出地位。全球和区域观测系统的存在是为了协调跨部门和国界的观测,利用有限的资源制作广泛可用的观测数据和信息产品。为中纬度和低纬度更集中的网络开发的观测系统设计和协调方法不一定直接适用于更复杂的北极环境。对后者的要求更高,因为更需要从地方到泛北极范围的跨学科和跨部门优先次序和改进,以便在具有挑战性的环境中最大限度地利用资源。考虑北极土著人民的观测优先事项和需求已成为治理和协调框架的核心原则。我们根据北极观测界和信息用户的需求评估了几种不同类型的观测系统,以确定每个框架的优势和劣势。从这一评估中得出了三种方法的类型:“基本变量”、“站点模型”和“中心问题”。我们根据北极环境的要求,定义并评估了2020年北极观测峰会和可持续北极观测网络路线图工作组先前工作中提出的共享北极变量(SAV)的概念。SAV代表了可测量的现象或过程,这些现象或过程对多个社区和部门来说足够重要,使协调观测工作变得有价值。SAV与全球观测框架定义的基本变量保持一致,因为它们指导多个部门感兴趣的过程之间的协调观测。SAV响应北极土著人民的信息需求,并利用他们的共同设计和管理观测工作的能力。SAV还针对北极作业的后勤挑战进行了定制,并解决了北极环境的独特方面,例如冰冻圈的核心作用。具体的例子说明了SAV框架在协调不同的观测方法和标准方面的灵活性,从而使全球和区域观测计划的优势能够适应复杂的北极环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arctic
Arctic 地学-环境科学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Arctic is a peer-reviewed, primary research journal that publishes the results of scientific research from all areas of Arctic scholarship. Original scholarly papers in the physical, social, and biological sciences, humanities, engineering, and technology are included, as are book reviews, commentaries, letters to the editor, and profiles of significant people, places, or events of northern interest
期刊最新文献
Compass, by Murray Lee George Noongwook (1949–2023) Community Perspectives on Inuit Country Food Insecurity in Gjoa Haven, Nunavut Participatory Video: One Contemporary Way for Cree and Inuit Adolescents to Relate to the Land in Nunavik Antarctic Pioneer: The Trailblazing Life of Jackie Ronne, by Joanna Kafarowski
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1