Excavating the Archive / Archiving the Excavation: Archival Processes and Contexts in Archaeology

IF 1.9 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Advances in Archaeological Practice Pub Date : 2022-04-19 DOI:10.1017/aap.2022.1
Chloe Ward
{"title":"Excavating the Archive / Archiving the Excavation: Archival Processes and Contexts in Archaeology","authors":"Chloe Ward","doi":"10.1017/aap.2022.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article focuses on the production of archaeological knowledge within the fieldwork archive. Archaeological archives do not always reflect the reality of evidence uncovered during fieldwork processes or even the fieldwork processes themselves. This includes the many different agents and agencies, which are crucial to the construction of archaeological knowledge and their representation—or lack of representation—in the archive. Archaeological archives impose restrictions on how knowledge is included in a collection, the way it is recorded, and the fieldwork processes used. Therefore, this article considers the way in which the processes of archival documentation produce, transform, and construct archaeological knowledge. The main examples are from the British School of Archaeology in Egypt's excavations at Abydos between 1921 and 1922, often referred to as the Tombs of the Courtiers and directed by Flinders Petrie. Looking at the different contexts of an excavation archive, from before its creation to its ongoing curation and use, can reveal significant aspects not just of the history of archaeology but also on many of the ongoing recording methods and processes still used in the field today.","PeriodicalId":7231,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Archaeological Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Archaeological Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aap.2022.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article focuses on the production of archaeological knowledge within the fieldwork archive. Archaeological archives do not always reflect the reality of evidence uncovered during fieldwork processes or even the fieldwork processes themselves. This includes the many different agents and agencies, which are crucial to the construction of archaeological knowledge and their representation—or lack of representation—in the archive. Archaeological archives impose restrictions on how knowledge is included in a collection, the way it is recorded, and the fieldwork processes used. Therefore, this article considers the way in which the processes of archival documentation produce, transform, and construct archaeological knowledge. The main examples are from the British School of Archaeology in Egypt's excavations at Abydos between 1921 and 1922, often referred to as the Tombs of the Courtiers and directed by Flinders Petrie. Looking at the different contexts of an excavation archive, from before its creation to its ongoing curation and use, can reveal significant aspects not just of the history of archaeology but also on many of the ongoing recording methods and processes still used in the field today.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发掘档案/归档发掘:考古学中的档案过程和背景
摘要本文关注的是田野调查档案中考古知识的产生。考古档案并不总是反映在实地调查过程中发现的证据的真实性,甚至不反映实地调查过程本身。这包括许多不同的代理人和机构,它们对考古知识的构建及其在档案中的代表性(或缺乏代表性)至关重要。考古档案对知识如何被纳入收藏、记录方式以及使用的实地调查过程施加了限制。因此,本文考虑了档案文献过程产生、转化和建构考古知识的方式。主要的例子来自英国考古学院1921年至1922年间在埃及阿比多斯的发掘,通常被称为宫廷陵墓,由Flinders Petrie执导。观察挖掘档案的不同背景,从创建之前到正在进行的策展和使用,不仅可以揭示考古史的重要方面,还可以揭示当今该领域仍在使用的许多正在进行的记录方法和过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
21.40%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Settlement Selection and Inequality in Video Games through an Anthropological Lens Regression with Archaeological Count Data A Paperless and 3D Workflow for Documenting Excavations at Insula I.14, Pompeii, Italy The Legality and Ethics of Web Scraping in Archaeology Experimental Archaeogaming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1