Quality Analysis of Antimicrobial Restriction Policy in Pediatrics

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2021-01-10 DOI:10.5812/PEDINFECT.100986
André Ricardo Araújo da Silva, Déborah Cardoso Albernaz de Almeida Dias
{"title":"Quality Analysis of Antimicrobial Restriction Policy in Pediatrics","authors":"André Ricardo Araújo da Silva, Déborah Cardoso Albernaz de Almeida Dias","doi":"10.5812/PEDINFECT.100986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are coordinated programs developed in recent years to promote the appropriate use of antimicrobials and reduce microbial resistance. One important action for a successful ASP is the implementation of an antimicrobial policy restriction. Objective: The study analyzed the quality of target-antimicrobial requisitions after the introduction of an antimicrobial policy restriction for children. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and three pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). An ASP was implemented in October 2016, and 14 target antimicrobials were selected to be prescribed after pre-approval by a pediatric infectious disease specialist. All requisitions were analyzed according to indication, antimicrobial type, dose, duration, and collection of cultures before administration. There were no exclusion criteria for requisition analysis. Results: Between October 2016 and December 2017, 1,173 patients were admitted to the units with 120 requisitions of target antimicrobials. Sepsis (43/120; 35.8%) was the most common indication, followed by respiratory infections (23/120; 19.2%) and infections in two or more sites (11/120; 9.2%). The most common target antimicrobials requested were meropenem (68/120; 56.7%), amphotericin B lipid formulations (12/120; 10%), teicoplanin (11/120; 9.2%), and linezolid (11/120; 9.2%). In 98 (81.7%) cases, previous cultures before antimicrobial administration were collected. An infectious agent was detected in 52 of the 98 cultures (53.1%), and Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria represented 50% and 26.9% of all positive samples, respectively. Besides, 111 (92.5%) requisitions were approved. In five refused requisitions, a narrow-spectrum antimicrobial was prescribed after further discussion; four were refused due to lack of information, and in one case, the de-escalation of the antimicrobial was possible. No mistake regarding dosage and duration was detected. Conclusions: We found a high-quality rate of target antimicrobial requisition. Antimicrobial policy restriction could contribute to improving the quality of antimicrobial prescription, even in NICUs and PICUs.","PeriodicalId":44261,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/PEDINFECT.100986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are coordinated programs developed in recent years to promote the appropriate use of antimicrobials and reduce microbial resistance. One important action for a successful ASP is the implementation of an antimicrobial policy restriction. Objective: The study analyzed the quality of target-antimicrobial requisitions after the introduction of an antimicrobial policy restriction for children. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and three pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). An ASP was implemented in October 2016, and 14 target antimicrobials were selected to be prescribed after pre-approval by a pediatric infectious disease specialist. All requisitions were analyzed according to indication, antimicrobial type, dose, duration, and collection of cultures before administration. There were no exclusion criteria for requisition analysis. Results: Between October 2016 and December 2017, 1,173 patients were admitted to the units with 120 requisitions of target antimicrobials. Sepsis (43/120; 35.8%) was the most common indication, followed by respiratory infections (23/120; 19.2%) and infections in two or more sites (11/120; 9.2%). The most common target antimicrobials requested were meropenem (68/120; 56.7%), amphotericin B lipid formulations (12/120; 10%), teicoplanin (11/120; 9.2%), and linezolid (11/120; 9.2%). In 98 (81.7%) cases, previous cultures before antimicrobial administration were collected. An infectious agent was detected in 52 of the 98 cultures (53.1%), and Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria represented 50% and 26.9% of all positive samples, respectively. Besides, 111 (92.5%) requisitions were approved. In five refused requisitions, a narrow-spectrum antimicrobial was prescribed after further discussion; four were refused due to lack of information, and in one case, the de-escalation of the antimicrobial was possible. No mistake regarding dosage and duration was detected. Conclusions: We found a high-quality rate of target antimicrobial requisition. Antimicrobial policy restriction could contribute to improving the quality of antimicrobial prescription, even in NICUs and PICUs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科抗菌药物限制政策的质量分析
背景:抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)是近年来制定的协调计划,旨在促进抗菌药物的适当使用并降低微生物耐药性。ASP成功的一个重要行动是实施抗菌政策限制。目的:本研究分析了儿童抗菌政策限制后目标抗菌药物需求的质量。方法:我们在新生儿重症监护室(NICU)和三个儿科重症监护室进行了回顾性研究。ASP于2016年10月实施,经儿科传染病专家预先批准后,选择了14种靶向抗菌药物进行处方。根据给药前的适应症、抗菌药物类型、剂量、持续时间和培养物收集对所有请购单进行分析。请购单分析没有排除标准。结果:2016年10月至2017年12月,1173名患者入住该单位,120份目标抗菌药物请购单。脓毒症(43/120;35.8%)是最常见的适应症,其次是呼吸道感染(23/120;19.2%)和两个或多个部位的感染(11/120;9.2%)。最常见的目标抗菌药物是美罗培南(68/120;56.7%)、两性霉素B脂质制剂(12/120;10%)、替考拉宁(11/120,9.2%)和利奈唑胺(11/120)。在98例(81.7%)病例中,收集施用抗微生物药物之前的先前培养物。在98种培养物中的52种(53.1%)中检测到感染源,革兰氏阴性菌和革兰氏阳性菌分别占所有阳性样本的50%和26.9%。此外,111份(92.5%)请购单获得批准。在五份被拒绝的请购单中,经过进一步讨论,开出了一种窄谱抗菌药物;四名患者因缺乏信息而被拒绝,在一个病例中,抗菌药物的降级是可能的。未发现剂量和持续时间方面的错误。结论:我们发现了高质量的目标抗菌药物需求率。抗菌药物政策限制可能有助于提高抗菌药物处方的质量,即使在新生儿重症监护室和PICU也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Archives Of Pediatric Infectious Disease is a clinical journal which is informative to all practitioners like pediatric infectious disease specialists and internists. This authoritative clinical journal was founded by Professor Abdollah Karimi in 2012. The Journal context is devoted to the particular compilation of the latest worldwide and interdisciplinary approach and findings including original manuscripts, meta-analyses and reviews, health economic papers, debates and consensus statements of clinical relevance to pediatric disease field, especially infectious diseases. In addition, consensus evidential reports not only highlight the new observations, original research and results accompanied by innovative treatments and all the other relevant topics but also include highlighting disease mechanisms or important clinical observations and letters on articles published in the journal.
期刊最新文献
Bacterial Etiology and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile in Neonatal Sepsis Factors Affecting the Length of Hospital Stay in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study in Bam City, Iran A Survey of the Prevalence Rate and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern of Microbial Agents in Preterm Neonatal Sepsis Thyroid Function Test Abnormalities in Children and Adolescents with COVID-19: A Case-Control Study Recurrent Fever and Abdominal Pain: Periodic Fever Syndrome, Inflammatory Bowel Disease or Patent Urachus; A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1