Building voting coalitions in electoral authoritarian regimes: a case study of the 2020 constitutional reform in Russia

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Post-Soviet Affairs Pub Date : 2023-02-08 DOI:10.1080/1060586X.2023.2172945
Paul Chaisty, S. Whitefield
{"title":"Building voting coalitions in electoral authoritarian regimes: a case study of the 2020 constitutional reform in Russia","authors":"Paul Chaisty, S. Whitefield","doi":"10.1080/1060586X.2023.2172945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Electoral authoritarian political systems have a hybrid nature, possessing very significant authoritarian features alongside elections that can produce openings for political change. The risks that elections pose to regimes are diminished if they can build winning coalitions involving voters beyond their core of loyal support. This paper considers how the construction of voter coalitions might be conceptualized in the Russian electoral authoritarian context, with reference to the case of the 2020 vote on constitutional reform, which was conducted with the primary aim of extending President Vladimir Putin’s term in office. Using data from a national survey of Russians conducted immediately after the vote, our analysis indicates that the regime’s success, even taking into account allegations of widespread fraud, was the result of its offer of additional constitutional amendments that were able to target voters beyond Putin’s core support.","PeriodicalId":46960,"journal":{"name":"Post-Soviet Affairs","volume":"39 1","pages":"273 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Soviet Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2023.2172945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Electoral authoritarian political systems have a hybrid nature, possessing very significant authoritarian features alongside elections that can produce openings for political change. The risks that elections pose to regimes are diminished if they can build winning coalitions involving voters beyond their core of loyal support. This paper considers how the construction of voter coalitions might be conceptualized in the Russian electoral authoritarian context, with reference to the case of the 2020 vote on constitutional reform, which was conducted with the primary aim of extending President Vladimir Putin’s term in office. Using data from a national survey of Russians conducted immediately after the vote, our analysis indicates that the regime’s success, even taking into account allegations of widespread fraud, was the result of its offer of additional constitutional amendments that were able to target voters beyond Putin’s core support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在选举独裁政权中建立投票联盟——以俄罗斯2020年宪法改革为例
选举专制政治制度具有混合性,具有非常显著的专制特征,同时选举也可以为政治变革创造机会。如果政权能够建立一个赢得胜利的联盟,让其核心忠诚支持者以外的选民参与进来,那么选举给政权带来的风险就会降低。本文以俄罗斯2020年的宪法改革投票为例,探讨了在俄罗斯选举威权主义背景下,选民联盟的构建如何概念化。此次宪法改革投票的主要目的是延长普京总统的任期。根据投票后立即进行的一项俄罗斯全国调查的数据,我们的分析表明,即使考虑到普遍存在的欺诈指控,该政权的成功也是由于它提出了额外的宪法修正案,这些修正案能够针对普京核心支持之外的选民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Quarterly publication featuring the work of prominent Western scholars on the republics of the former Soviet Union providing exclusive, up-to-the-minute analyses of the state of the economy and society, progress toward economic reform, and linkages between political and social changes and economic developments. Published since 1985.
期刊最新文献
Dissecting Putin’s regime ideology Two statisms of Putin’s ideology: from proclamations of patriotic values to welfare promises of wartime mobilization A hidden form of mass event: the law, politics, and practice of single pickets in Russia “You should care by prohibiting all this obscenity”: a public policy analysis of the Russian law banning medical and legal transition for transgender people Authoritarian succession, rules, and conflicts: Tokayev’s gambit and Kazakhstan’s bloody January of 2022 (Qandy Qantar)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1