Spatial Coverage of Protection for Terrestrial Species under the Canadian Species at Risk Act

IF 1.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Ecoscience Pub Date : 2020-03-30 DOI:10.1080/11956860.2020.1741497
Clark S. Bolliger, Calla V. Raymond, R. Schuster, J. Bennett
{"title":"Spatial Coverage of Protection for Terrestrial Species under the Canadian Species at Risk Act","authors":"Clark S. Bolliger, Calla V. Raymond, R. Schuster, J. Bennett","doi":"10.1080/11956860.2020.1741497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Canada's Species at Risk Act (SARA) has been critiqued for only protecting species on federal lands. However, this shortcoming has never been quantitatively assessed in terms of species' ranges. We assessed the proportion of ranges of federally-listed terrestrial species at risk (SAR) receiving protection via SARA, excluding birds protected by the Migratory Birds Convention Act. Additionally, we assessed species protection provided by provincial and territorial protected areas within the ranges of SARA-listed species. We show that federal land provides protection within only 8.1% of species' Canadian ranges on average, and 63.1% of 252 terrestrial SAR are protected within less than 5% of their range. The addition of provincial and territorial protected areas increases this average to 14.6% and reduces the percent with less than 5% protection to 34.9% of species. Eighteen species receive 0% protection within their Canadian ranges. We found no significant difference in average protection among taxonomic groups. Canada's capacity to protect SAR via SARA could be improved by greater coordination among national, provincial and Indigenous governments, the creation of a more effective protected area network, exercising SARA's provision for emergency protection orders where applicable, and facilitating greater SAR protection on public and private lands.","PeriodicalId":51030,"journal":{"name":"Ecoscience","volume":"27 1","pages":"141 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/11956860.2020.1741497","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecoscience","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2020.1741497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT Canada's Species at Risk Act (SARA) has been critiqued for only protecting species on federal lands. However, this shortcoming has never been quantitatively assessed in terms of species' ranges. We assessed the proportion of ranges of federally-listed terrestrial species at risk (SAR) receiving protection via SARA, excluding birds protected by the Migratory Birds Convention Act. Additionally, we assessed species protection provided by provincial and territorial protected areas within the ranges of SARA-listed species. We show that federal land provides protection within only 8.1% of species' Canadian ranges on average, and 63.1% of 252 terrestrial SAR are protected within less than 5% of their range. The addition of provincial and territorial protected areas increases this average to 14.6% and reduces the percent with less than 5% protection to 34.9% of species. Eighteen species receive 0% protection within their Canadian ranges. We found no significant difference in average protection among taxonomic groups. Canada's capacity to protect SAR via SARA could be improved by greater coordination among national, provincial and Indigenous governments, the creation of a more effective protected area network, exercising SARA's provision for emergency protection orders where applicable, and facilitating greater SAR protection on public and private lands.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《加拿大濒危物种法》下陆生物种保护的空间覆盖范围
摘要加拿大的《濒危物种法》因只保护联邦土地上的物种而受到批评。然而,这一缺点从未从物种范围的角度进行过定量评估。我们评估了联邦列出的陆地濒危物种(SAR)通过SARA获得保护的比例,不包括受《候鸟公约法》保护的鸟类。此外,我们还评估了省和地区保护区在严重急性呼吸系统综合征所列物种范围内提供的物种保护。我们发现,联邦土地平均仅在加拿大物种范围的8.1%范围内提供保护,252个陆地SAR中63.1%在不到5%的范围内受到保护。省级和地区保护区的增加使这一平均值增加到14.6%,保护率低于5%的物种减少到34.9%。18个物种在其加拿大范围内受到0%的保护。我们发现分类群之间的平均保护率没有显著差异。可以通过加强国家、省和土著政府之间的协调,建立更有效的保护区网络,在适用的情况下行使加拿大特别行政区紧急保护令的规定,以及促进在公共和私人土地上加强特别行政区保护,来提高加拿大通过《特别行政区法》保护特别行政区的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecoscience
Ecoscience 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Écoscience, is a multidisciplinary journal that covers all aspects of ecology. The journal welcomes submissions in English or French and publishes original work focusing on patterns and processes at various temporal and spatial scales across different levels of biological organization. Articles include original research, brief communications and reviews.
期刊最新文献
Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) has Minor Effects on Soil Nutrient and Carbon Dynamics Cover Influence of Competition on Root Architecture and Root Anchorage of Young Hybrid Poplar Plantations on Waste Rock Slopes Investigating Spatiotemporal Patterns, Spatial Density Dependence and Fruit Quality in a Plant-Bruchine-Parasitoids System No Evidence of a Northward Biome Shift of Treeline in the Mackay Lake Region, North-Central Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1