Comparison of the effects of vid-cast and lecture-based training courses on burn knowledge among medical interns at the Motahari burn hospital

M. Roham, Z. Sohrabi, Shoaleh Bigdeli, A. Dehnad, Z. Hosseinzadeh
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of vid-cast and lecture-based training courses on burn knowledge among medical interns at the Motahari burn hospital","authors":"M. Roham, Z. Sohrabi, Shoaleh Bigdeli, A. Dehnad, Z. Hosseinzadeh","doi":"10.34172/rdme.2022.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A training course on burn infection and care is one of the courses that medical students take during their internship. This training course has not yet been taught through e-learning in medical schools in Iran. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of two methods: traditional lecturing and employing a vid-cast with interactive electronic content, on the knowledge of interns in a training course on burns. Methods: This quasi-experimental study with a pre-post non-equivalent group design was conducted among medical interns taking burn rotation training courses at the Motahari burn hospital, affiliated with the Iran University of Medical Sciences. The two groups were given a pre-test at the beginning of the course. One group was given in-person lectures, and the other was given the same content in the form of a vid-cast with interactive electronic files. At the end of the rotation course, a post-test was administered on the planned content, and scores of both groups were compared. Results: The pre-test mean scores in the lecture group before and after the training intervention were 8 and 14.2, respectively; this difference was significant (P<0.001). The difference between the pre-test and post-test mean scores in the vid-cast group was also significant (P<0.001).The mean of post-test scores in the lecture group was 14.92 and 17.24 in the e-learning group; this difference was also significant (P<0.001). Conclusion: Post-test scores in the e-learning group were higher with a significant statistical difference, suggesting that the e-learning outperformed their counterparts in the traditional lecture model. It is recommended that e-learning be used either as a supplementary or the main method of training in burn infection and care for interns.","PeriodicalId":21087,"journal":{"name":"Research and Development in Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Development in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/rdme.2022.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A training course on burn infection and care is one of the courses that medical students take during their internship. This training course has not yet been taught through e-learning in medical schools in Iran. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effects of two methods: traditional lecturing and employing a vid-cast with interactive electronic content, on the knowledge of interns in a training course on burns. Methods: This quasi-experimental study with a pre-post non-equivalent group design was conducted among medical interns taking burn rotation training courses at the Motahari burn hospital, affiliated with the Iran University of Medical Sciences. The two groups were given a pre-test at the beginning of the course. One group was given in-person lectures, and the other was given the same content in the form of a vid-cast with interactive electronic files. At the end of the rotation course, a post-test was administered on the planned content, and scores of both groups were compared. Results: The pre-test mean scores in the lecture group before and after the training intervention were 8 and 14.2, respectively; this difference was significant (P<0.001). The difference between the pre-test and post-test mean scores in the vid-cast group was also significant (P<0.001).The mean of post-test scores in the lecture group was 14.92 and 17.24 in the e-learning group; this difference was also significant (P<0.001). Conclusion: Post-test scores in the e-learning group were higher with a significant statistical difference, suggesting that the e-learning outperformed their counterparts in the traditional lecture model. It is recommended that e-learning be used either as a supplementary or the main method of training in burn infection and care for interns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Motahari烧伤医院医学实习生烧伤知识视频培训与讲座培训的效果比较
背景:烧伤感染与护理培训课程是医学生在实习期间学习的课程之一。伊朗的医学院尚未通过电子学习方式教授这一培训课程。因此,本研究旨在比较两种方法的效果:传统的讲座和采用视频播放与互动的电子内容,对实习生在烧伤培训课程的知识。方法:本准实验研究采用职前非等效组设计,在伊朗医学大学附属Motahari烧伤医院参加烧伤轮转培训课程的医学实习生中进行。这两组学生在课程开始时都进行了一次预测。一组接受了面对面的讲座,而另一组则以视频的形式接受了同样的内容,并配有互动电子文件。在轮转课程结束时,对计划内容进行后测,比较两组的得分。结果:授课组在训练干预前后的前测平均分分别为8分和14.2分;差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。视频播放组测试前和测试后的平均得分也有显著差异(P<0.001)。讲座组的后测平均分为14.92分,网络学习组的后测平均分为17.24分;这一差异也具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论:e-learning组的后测得分较高,且差异有统计学意义,说明e-learning优于传统课堂模式。建议将电子学习作为实习生烧伤感染和护理培训的补充或主要方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
The role of academic stress and scientific motivation in predicting research spirit among the students of medicalsciences The relationship between identity development and medical students’ performance in technology-integrated English language classrooms Challenges in the educational system of maxillofacial surgery residency training in Iran: Monodisciplinarity system or dual degree system? The use of social media (communication applications) in the training of medical students, especially oral and maxillofacial surgery residents in Iran Challenges and acceptance of e-teaching among medical professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1