{"title":"Overlooking Blanco White's Abolitionist Consciousness: Menéndez Pelayo and Goytisolo","authors":"J. Krauel","doi":"10.1353/hir.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The purpose of this article is to rethink the modern reception of José María Blanco White's Bosquejo del comercio de esclavos (1814) through an analysis of Marcelino Menéndez Pelayo's chapter on Blanco White in his Historia de los heterodoxos españoles (1880–1882) and Juan Goytisolo's foreword to his anthology Obra inglesa, selecta de sus obras en esta lengua (1972). By drawing on the insights of the \"archival turn\" taken by contemporary critics, this essay reveals how Menéndez Pelayo's omission of Blanco White's abolitionism had such lasting effects that Goytisolo was unable to rectify it despite his explicit political commitments to human dignity, antislavery, and antiracism. Ultimately, this article shows that Goytisolo failed to treat Blanco White's abolitionist sentiment as a historical topic in its own right because he mounted a political challenge to Menéndez Pelayo's portrayal of Blanco White, but at the same time left untouched the power inscribed in the Catholic polymath's archival narrative.","PeriodicalId":44625,"journal":{"name":"HISPANIC REVIEW","volume":"90 1","pages":"245 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISPANIC REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hir.2022.0012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT:The purpose of this article is to rethink the modern reception of José María Blanco White's Bosquejo del comercio de esclavos (1814) through an analysis of Marcelino Menéndez Pelayo's chapter on Blanco White in his Historia de los heterodoxos españoles (1880–1882) and Juan Goytisolo's foreword to his anthology Obra inglesa, selecta de sus obras en esta lengua (1972). By drawing on the insights of the "archival turn" taken by contemporary critics, this essay reveals how Menéndez Pelayo's omission of Blanco White's abolitionism had such lasting effects that Goytisolo was unable to rectify it despite his explicit political commitments to human dignity, antislavery, and antiracism. Ultimately, this article shows that Goytisolo failed to treat Blanco White's abolitionist sentiment as a historical topic in its own right because he mounted a political challenge to Menéndez Pelayo's portrayal of Blanco White, but at the same time left untouched the power inscribed in the Catholic polymath's archival narrative.
摘要:本文旨在通过对马塞利诺·门德斯·佩拉约(Marcelino Menéndez Pelayo)在其《西班牙异教徒史》(1880–1882)中关于布兰科·怀特的章节以及胡安·戈伊蒂索洛(Juan Goytisolo)为其选集《Obra inglesa,selecta de sus obras en esta lengua》(1972)撰写的前言的分析,重新思考何塞·马里亚·布兰科·怀特(JoséMaría Blanco White。通过借鉴当代评论家对“档案转向”的见解,本文揭示了门德斯·佩拉约对布兰科·怀特废奴主义的忽视是如何产生如此持久的影响的,以至于戈伊蒂索洛尽管对人类尊严、反奴隶制和反种族主义做出了明确的政治承诺,但却无法纠正这种影响。最终,这篇文章表明,Goytisolo未能将Blanco White的废奴主义情绪视为一个历史话题,因为他对Menéndez Pelayo对Blanco怀特的刻画提出了政治挑战,但同时也没有触及这位天主教学者档案叙事中所蕴含的权力。
期刊介绍:
A quarterly journal devoted to research in Hispanic and Luso-Brazilian literatures and cultures, Hispanic Review has been edited since 1933 by the Department of Romance Languages at the University of Pennsylvania. The journal features essays and book reviews on the diverse cultural manifestations of Iberia and Latin America, from the medieval period to the present.