Private and public transfers: substitute or complement?

Q2 Social Sciences Naselenie i ekonomika Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.3897/popecon.5.e60293
A. Mironova, L. A. Shenshina
{"title":"Private and public transfers: substitute or complement?","authors":"A. Mironova, L. A. Shenshina","doi":"10.3897/popecon.5.e60293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes the relationship between private and public social transfers in Russia. The research relies on the data from the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS-HSE) carried out by the Higher School of Economics in 1994–2018. The household is the unit of the analysis, the method of logistic regression is applied. The study has shown that when a household receives public social transfers, it is less likely to receive private transfers. So, the findings appear to bear out the hypothesis that public transfers crowd out private transfers in Russia.","PeriodicalId":33779,"journal":{"name":"Naselenie i ekonomika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naselenie i ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.5.e60293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper analyzes the relationship between private and public social transfers in Russia. The research relies on the data from the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey (RLMS-HSE) carried out by the Higher School of Economics in 1994–2018. The household is the unit of the analysis, the method of logistic regression is applied. The study has shown that when a household receives public social transfers, it is less likely to receive private transfers. So, the findings appear to bear out the hypothesis that public transfers crowd out private transfers in Russia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私人和公共转让:替代还是补充?
本文分析了俄罗斯私人社会转移与公共社会转移的关系。这项研究依赖于高等经济学院在1994-2018年进行的俄罗斯纵向监测调查(RLMS-HSE)的数据。以家庭为分析单位,采用逻辑回归方法。研究表明,当一个家庭接受公共社会转移时,它不太可能接受私人转移。因此,研究结果似乎证实了俄罗斯公共转移排挤私人转移的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Naselenie i ekonomika
Naselenie i ekonomika Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Geoinformation analysis russian health system: modeling, visualization, analysis Sustainable development, ESG and the “price” of health Household time allocation in Russia: economic or sociocultural model? Cultural Changes in Russia during the Coronavirus Crisis Involved fatherhood in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1