Forecasting Achievement Sports through Cooperative Learning in Handball Training in Physical Education

IF 0.8 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Annals of Applied Sport Science Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.52547/aassjournal.953
Mohammed Majid Mohammed Salih, Riyadh Saihood Hashim, Munadhil Adil Kasim
{"title":"Forecasting Achievement Sports through Cooperative Learning in Handball Training in Physical Education","authors":"Mohammed Majid Mohammed Salih, Riyadh Saihood Hashim, Munadhil Adil Kasim","doi":"10.52547/aassjournal.953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. This work studied 60 university students who were registered in two handball training classes in the second year of Physical Education and Sports Science throughout the academic year 2017 to 2018. Objectives. It aims to identify the impact of two different training styles (cooperative and traditional) on players’ achievements and basic techniques in a handball learning unit. Methods. Hence, the sample was divided into the control and experiment groups. The experiment group was subjected to the cooperative training technique, whereas the control group was subjected to the traditional training (teacher-cantered) technique. The complying instruments were used to collect learning design inventory, handball achievement tests, handball techniques, and assessment forms. Results. The handball attitude scale revealed that cooperative training during a handball training class has a stronger link to students’ sporting activities achievements, class attitude, and exercise skills compared to traditional training. Results of players’ test range suggest that they prefer cooperative training. Conclusions. This study can help researchers and practitioners conduct Cooperative Learning intervention programs Physical Education in Schools and Universities.","PeriodicalId":43187,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Applied Sport Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Applied Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/aassjournal.953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background. This work studied 60 university students who were registered in two handball training classes in the second year of Physical Education and Sports Science throughout the academic year 2017 to 2018. Objectives. It aims to identify the impact of two different training styles (cooperative and traditional) on players’ achievements and basic techniques in a handball learning unit. Methods. Hence, the sample was divided into the control and experiment groups. The experiment group was subjected to the cooperative training technique, whereas the control group was subjected to the traditional training (teacher-cantered) technique. The complying instruments were used to collect learning design inventory, handball achievement tests, handball techniques, and assessment forms. Results. The handball attitude scale revealed that cooperative training during a handball training class has a stronger link to students’ sporting activities achievements, class attitude, and exercise skills compared to traditional training. Results of players’ test range suggest that they prefer cooperative training. Conclusions. This study can help researchers and practitioners conduct Cooperative Learning intervention programs Physical Education in Schools and Universities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育手球训练合作学习预测运动成绩
背景这项工作研究了在2017至2018学年体育与体育科学二年级注册的60名大学生,他们参加了两个手球训练班。目标。它旨在确定两种不同的训练方式(合作和传统)对手球学习单元中球员成绩和基本技术的影响。方法。因此,将样品分为对照组和实验组。实验组采用合作训练技术,对照组采用传统训练(教师慢跑)技术。符合要求的工具用于收集学习设计清单、手球成绩测试、手球技术和评估表。后果手球态度量表显示,与传统训练相比,手球训练课上的合作训练与学生的体育活动成绩、课堂态度和运动技能有更强的联系。运动员测试范围的结果表明,他们更喜欢合作训练。结论。这项研究可以帮助研究人员和从业者在中小学和大学开展合作学习干预计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Applied Sport Science
Annals of Applied Sport Science HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The editorial policy of The Annals of Applied Sport Science (Ann. Appl. Sport Sci.) follows the multi-disciplinary purposes of the sports science to promote the highest standards of scientific study referring to the following fields: • Sport Physiology and its related branches, • Sport Management and its related branches, • Kinesiology and Sport medicine and its related branches, • Sport Psychology and its related branches, • Motor Control and its related branches, • Sport Biomechanics and its related branches, • Sociology of Sport and its related branches, • History of Sport and its related branches, • Exercise, Training, Physical Activity and Health, • Physical Education and Learning. The emphasis of the journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined, and applied to sport and exercise that is defined inclusively to refer to all forms of human movement that aim to maintain or improve physical and mental well-being, create or improve social relationships, or obtain results in competition at all levels. The animal projects also can be evaluated with the decision of Editorial Boards.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Characteristics of Psychophysiological and Shooting Performance Between Intermediate and Elite Compound Archers The Relationship between Socioeconomic Factors, Physical Literacy, Physical Health, and Well-being among Female Athletes: A Construct Theoretical Model The Comparison of Postural Control in Pole Vaulters of Different Skill Levels The Eight-Week Circuit Resistance Training Decreased the Serum Levels of WISP-1 and WISP-2 in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes The Level of Burnout of Swimming Coaches in Summer Clubs at Jordanian Secondary Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1