Previous exposure to common coronavirus HCoV-NL63 is associated with reduced COVID-19 severity in patients from Cape Town, South Africa

IF 2 Q4 VIROLOGY Frontiers in virology Pub Date : 2023-02-08 DOI:10.3389/fviro.2023.1125448
L. C. Lesmes-Rodríguez, Humaira Lambarey, Abeen Chetram, C. Riou, R. Wilkinson, Wendy Joyimbana, L. Jennings, C. Orrell, Dumar A. Jaramillo-Hernández, Georgia Schäfer
{"title":"Previous exposure to common coronavirus HCoV-NL63 is associated with reduced COVID-19 severity in patients from Cape Town, South Africa","authors":"L. C. Lesmes-Rodríguez, Humaira Lambarey, Abeen Chetram, C. Riou, R. Wilkinson, Wendy Joyimbana, L. Jennings, C. Orrell, Dumar A. Jaramillo-Hernández, Georgia Schäfer","doi":"10.3389/fviro.2023.1125448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Globally, the most significant risk factors for adverse COVID-19 outcome are increasing age and cardiometabolic comorbidities. However, underlying coinfections may modulate COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, particularly in regions with high prevalence of infectious diseases. Methods We retrospectively analyzed serum samples for IgG antibodies against the common circulating coronaviruses HCoV-NL63, HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 from non-hospitalized and hospitalized confirmed COVID-19 patients recruited during the first (June-August 2020) and second (October 2020-June 2021) COVID-19 wave in Cape Town, South Africa. Patients were grouped according to COVID-19 disease severity: Group 1: previously SARS-CoV-2 infected with positive serology and no symptoms (n=94); Group 2: acutely SARS-CoV-2 infected, hospitalized for COVID-19 and severe symptoms (n=92). Results The overall anti-HCoV IgG seroprevalence in the entire patient cohort was 60.8% (95% CI: 53.7 – 67.8), with 37.1% HCoV-NL63 (95% CI: 30 – 44), 30.6% HCoV-229E (95% CI: 24 – 37.3), 22.6% HCoV-HKU1 (95% CI: 16.6 – 28.6), and 21.0% HCoV-OC43 (95% CI: 15.1 – 26.8). We observed a significantly higher overall HCoV presence (72.3% versus 48.9%) and coinfection frequency (43.6% versus 19.6%) in group 1 compared to group 2 patients with significantly higher presentation of HCoV-NL63 (67.0% versus 6.6%) and HCoV-HKU1 (31.1% versus 14.1%). However, only antibody titers for HCoV-NL63 were significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 patients (p< 0.0001, 1.90 [95% CI: 0.62 – 2.45] versus 1.32 [95% CI: 0.30 – 2.01]) which was independent of the participants’ HIV status. Logistic regression analysis revealed significantly protective effects by previous exposure to HCoV-NL63 [p< 0.001, adjusted OR = 0.0176 (95% CI: 0.0039 – 0.0786)], while previous HCoV-229E exposure was associated with increased COVID-19 severity [p = 0.0051, adjusted OR = 7.3239 (95% CI: 1.8195–29.4800)]. Conclusion We conclude that previous exposure to multiple common coronaviruses, and particularly HCoV-NL63, might protect against severe COVID-19, while no previous HCoV exposure or single infection with HCoV-229E might enhance the risk for severe COVID-19. To our knowledge, this is the first report on HCoV seroprevalence in South Africa and its possible association with cross-protection against COVID-19 severity.","PeriodicalId":73114,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in virology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fviro.2023.1125448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Globally, the most significant risk factors for adverse COVID-19 outcome are increasing age and cardiometabolic comorbidities. However, underlying coinfections may modulate COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, particularly in regions with high prevalence of infectious diseases. Methods We retrospectively analyzed serum samples for IgG antibodies against the common circulating coronaviruses HCoV-NL63, HCoV-229E, HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1 from non-hospitalized and hospitalized confirmed COVID-19 patients recruited during the first (June-August 2020) and second (October 2020-June 2021) COVID-19 wave in Cape Town, South Africa. Patients were grouped according to COVID-19 disease severity: Group 1: previously SARS-CoV-2 infected with positive serology and no symptoms (n=94); Group 2: acutely SARS-CoV-2 infected, hospitalized for COVID-19 and severe symptoms (n=92). Results The overall anti-HCoV IgG seroprevalence in the entire patient cohort was 60.8% (95% CI: 53.7 – 67.8), with 37.1% HCoV-NL63 (95% CI: 30 – 44), 30.6% HCoV-229E (95% CI: 24 – 37.3), 22.6% HCoV-HKU1 (95% CI: 16.6 – 28.6), and 21.0% HCoV-OC43 (95% CI: 15.1 – 26.8). We observed a significantly higher overall HCoV presence (72.3% versus 48.9%) and coinfection frequency (43.6% versus 19.6%) in group 1 compared to group 2 patients with significantly higher presentation of HCoV-NL63 (67.0% versus 6.6%) and HCoV-HKU1 (31.1% versus 14.1%). However, only antibody titers for HCoV-NL63 were significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 patients (p< 0.0001, 1.90 [95% CI: 0.62 – 2.45] versus 1.32 [95% CI: 0.30 – 2.01]) which was independent of the participants’ HIV status. Logistic regression analysis revealed significantly protective effects by previous exposure to HCoV-NL63 [p< 0.001, adjusted OR = 0.0176 (95% CI: 0.0039 – 0.0786)], while previous HCoV-229E exposure was associated with increased COVID-19 severity [p = 0.0051, adjusted OR = 7.3239 (95% CI: 1.8195–29.4800)]. Conclusion We conclude that previous exposure to multiple common coronaviruses, and particularly HCoV-NL63, might protect against severe COVID-19, while no previous HCoV exposure or single infection with HCoV-229E might enhance the risk for severe COVID-19. To our knowledge, this is the first report on HCoV seroprevalence in South Africa and its possible association with cross-protection against COVID-19 severity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在南非开普敦的患者中,以前接触过常见冠状病毒HCoV-NL63与COVID-19严重程度降低有关
在全球范围内,COVID-19不良结局的最重要危险因素是年龄增加和心脏代谢合并症。然而,潜在的合并感染可能会调节COVID-19的发病率和死亡率,特别是在传染病高流行地区。方法回顾性分析在南非开普敦第一次(2020年6月- 8月)和第二次(2020年10月- 2021年6月)COVID-19浪潮期间招募的非住院和住院确诊的COVID-19患者血清中针对常见循环冠状病毒HCoV-NL63、HCoV-229E、HCoV-OC43和HCoV-HKU1的IgG抗体。根据COVID-19疾病严重程度分组:1组:既往SARS-CoV-2感染,血清学阳性,无症状(n=94);第二组:急性SARS-CoV-2感染,因COVID-19住院,症状严重(n=92)。结果整个患者队列中抗hcov IgG血清总阳性率为60.8% (95% CI: 53.7 ~ 67.8),其中HCoV-NL63 37.1% (95% CI: 30 ~ 44), HCoV-229E 30.6% (95% CI: 24 ~ 37.3), HCoV-HKU1 22.6% (95% CI: 16.6 ~ 28.6), HCoV-OC43 21.0% (95% CI: 15.1 ~ 26.8)。我们观察到,与HCoV- nl63(67.0%对6.6%)和HCoV- hku1(31.1%对14.1%)表现明显较高的2组患者相比,1组患者的HCoV总体存在率(72.3%对48.9%)和合并感染频率(43.6%对19.6%)显著更高。然而,只有HCoV-NL63抗体滴度在1组患者中显著高于2组患者(p< 0.0001, 1.90 [95% CI: 0.62 - 2.45]对1.32 [95% CI: 0.30 - 2.01]),这与参与者的HIV状态无关。Logistic回归分析显示,既往暴露于HCoV-NL63具有显著的保护作用[p< 0.001,校正OR = 0.0176 (95% CI: 0.0039 ~ 0.0786)],而既往暴露于HCoV-229E与COVID-19严重程度增加相关[p = 0.0051,校正OR = 7.3239 (95% CI: 1.8195 ~ 29.4800)]。结论既往暴露于多种常见冠状病毒,特别是HCoV- nl63可能对重症COVID-19有保护作用,而既往未暴露于HCoV或单一感染HCoV- 229e可能会增加重症COVID-19的风险。据我们所知,这是关于南非HCoV血清阳性率及其可能与COVID-19严重程度交叉保护之间关系的第一份报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frontiers | Phylogenetic-based methods for fine-scale classification of PRRSV-2 ORF5 sequences: a comparison of their robustness and reproducibility Frontiers | A proposed new Tombusviridae genus featuring extremely long 5' untranslated regions and a luteo/polerovirus-like gene block Frontiers | Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 seroprevalence in non-vaccinated People Living with HIV in Uganda during the year 2022 Frontiers | Predicting Antibody and ACE2 Affinity for SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 and JN.1 with In Silico Protein Modeling and Docking Frontiers | HIV latency potential may beis influenced by intra-subtype genetic differences in the viral long-terminal repeat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1