Payment of Money in Lieu of the Crime of Corruption in the Recovery of Assets

H. Helmi
{"title":"Payment of Money in Lieu of the Crime of Corruption in the Recovery of Assets","authors":"H. Helmi","doi":"10.32801/lamlaj.v6i2.221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In terms of sanctions, the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption adheres to a double track system, in the sense that in addition to criminal sanctions, it also contains civil sanctions, namely additional penalties in the form of payment of replacement money. So that the law enforcement of corruption in addition to being oriented to “follow the suspect” and “follow the money”, to recover state financial losses. The purpose of this research is to analyze the criminal urgency of paying replacement money in corruption crimes and to analyze the criteria for corruption crimes that can be imposed with additional criminal sanctions. This legal research is a prescriptive normative legal research, with a law approach and a concept approach, using primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study, (a). The urgency of imposing a penalty for paying compensation is to recover state financial losses from corruption, in which case corruption involving state finances is an act that robs the community of socio-economic rights as stated in the 1945 Constitution, and the penalty for replacement money that has been paid by the convict can be used to “promote the general welfare”. (b). The criteria for imposing a substitute money penalty are: (1). the criminal act of corruption committed by the defendant has caused state financial losses; (2). The defendant has obtained property from the act of corruption he has committed; and (3). The defendant has not returned the state financial loss in the amount of the property he has obtained.","PeriodicalId":31238,"journal":{"name":"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v6i2.221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In terms of sanctions, the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption adheres to a double track system, in the sense that in addition to criminal sanctions, it also contains civil sanctions, namely additional penalties in the form of payment of replacement money. So that the law enforcement of corruption in addition to being oriented to “follow the suspect” and “follow the money”, to recover state financial losses. The purpose of this research is to analyze the criminal urgency of paying replacement money in corruption crimes and to analyze the criteria for corruption crimes that can be imposed with additional criminal sanctions. This legal research is a prescriptive normative legal research, with a law approach and a concept approach, using primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this study, (a). The urgency of imposing a penalty for paying compensation is to recover state financial losses from corruption, in which case corruption involving state finances is an act that robs the community of socio-economic rights as stated in the 1945 Constitution, and the penalty for replacement money that has been paid by the convict can be used to “promote the general welfare”. (b). The criteria for imposing a substitute money penalty are: (1). the criminal act of corruption committed by the defendant has caused state financial losses; (2). The defendant has obtained property from the act of corruption he has committed; and (3). The defendant has not returned the state financial loss in the amount of the property he has obtained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在追缴资产中以金钱代替贪污罪
在制裁方面,《根除腐败犯罪行为法》坚持双轨制,即除刑事制裁外,还包括民事制裁,即以支付替代金的形式进行额外处罚。使腐败的执法除了以“跟着嫌疑人走”和“跟着钱走”为导向外,还要追回国家财政损失。本研究的目的是分析腐败犯罪中支付替代金的刑事紧迫性,并分析可以附加刑事制裁的腐败犯罪标准。这项法律研究是一项规定性的规范性法律研究,采用法律方法和概念方法,使用主要和次要的法律材料。这项研究的结果,(a)。对支付赔偿金施加惩罚的紧迫性是为了弥补腐败造成的国家财政损失,在这种情况下,涉及国家财政的腐败是剥夺1945年《宪法》规定的社会经济权利的行为,罪犯支付的替代金的惩罚可用于“促进普遍福利”。(b) 。征收替代罚款的标准是:(1)。被告人的贪污犯罪行为造成国家财政损失的;(2) 。被告人从其腐败行为中获得财产的;和(3)。被告没有退还其所获得财产的国家经济损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of the Crime of Burning Peatlands in Banjar Regency Company Loans in Procurement of Goods Services Government Corruption Perspectives Forced Marriage as an Unlawful Act in Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis Legal Protection of Peer to Peer Lending Loans in Standard Agreements Based on Legal Assurance Theory Implementation of Sustainable Plantation Principles Through Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil in North Aceh Regency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1