The ‘Emergency Stone Clinic’ – improving patient care: A collaborative, hospital-based quality improvement project

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2022-05-21 DOI:10.1177/20514158221095486
E. Balai, S. Folkard, T. Tien, K. Atalar, B. Berry, Shelina Runa, C. Bastianpillai, S. Graham, J. Green, P. Pal
{"title":"The ‘Emergency Stone Clinic’ – improving patient care: A collaborative, hospital-based quality improvement project","authors":"E. Balai, S. Folkard, T. Tien, K. Atalar, B. Berry, Shelina Runa, C. Bastianpillai, S. Graham, J. Green, P. Pal","doi":"10.1177/20514158221095486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a current drive nationally to improve the management of acute ureteric colic. Management targets set by the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) include a 4-week target for the time from diagnosis-to-definitive management, or to clinic review in patients managed expectantly. The motivation to review our acute stone service stemmed from concerns that we did not have the capacity to consistently offer primary definitive treatment or timely clinic review to patients. We aimed to restructure our service using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to achieve the BAUS targets. All patients diagnosed with a ureteric stone between March and September 2017 were reviewed as a baseline. Our strategy for improvement involved implementing an emergency stone clinic (ESC) model. This was developed through collaboration between the key stakeholders and centred on a weekly consultant-led specialist clinic designed to review and make early management decisions for all patients referred with a ureteric stone meeting pre-agreed criteria. Post-intervention data were collected between June 2018 and January 2019. To assess whether we were able to meet these targets during the COVID-19 pandemic, data were also collected between January 2020 and October 2020. Time from CT diagnosis to clinic review reduced from 77 to 9 days. Patients seen within 4 weeks of diagnosis improved from 2.9% to 90.5%. Of those requiring a procedure, the percentage receiving a primary intervention increased to 72.1%. Emergency stent insertion was reduced from 69% to 27.9%. The rate of patient re-presentation to A&E reduced from 3.0 to 1.6 episodes/month. The percentage receiving their definitive procedure within 4 weeks improved from 26.2% to 51.2% in the first post-intervention cycle and remained at 54.5% during the pandemic period. Implementing the ESC model led to substantial improvements in patient care and significant progress towards achieving the BAUS management targets while reducing the burden on our Emergency Department. Not applicable","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221095486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is a current drive nationally to improve the management of acute ureteric colic. Management targets set by the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) include a 4-week target for the time from diagnosis-to-definitive management, or to clinic review in patients managed expectantly. The motivation to review our acute stone service stemmed from concerns that we did not have the capacity to consistently offer primary definitive treatment or timely clinic review to patients. We aimed to restructure our service using Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to achieve the BAUS targets. All patients diagnosed with a ureteric stone between March and September 2017 were reviewed as a baseline. Our strategy for improvement involved implementing an emergency stone clinic (ESC) model. This was developed through collaboration between the key stakeholders and centred on a weekly consultant-led specialist clinic designed to review and make early management decisions for all patients referred with a ureteric stone meeting pre-agreed criteria. Post-intervention data were collected between June 2018 and January 2019. To assess whether we were able to meet these targets during the COVID-19 pandemic, data were also collected between January 2020 and October 2020. Time from CT diagnosis to clinic review reduced from 77 to 9 days. Patients seen within 4 weeks of diagnosis improved from 2.9% to 90.5%. Of those requiring a procedure, the percentage receiving a primary intervention increased to 72.1%. Emergency stent insertion was reduced from 69% to 27.9%. The rate of patient re-presentation to A&E reduced from 3.0 to 1.6 episodes/month. The percentage receiving their definitive procedure within 4 weeks improved from 26.2% to 51.2% in the first post-intervention cycle and remained at 54.5% during the pandemic period. Implementing the ESC model led to substantial improvements in patient care and significant progress towards achieving the BAUS management targets while reducing the burden on our Emergency Department. Not applicable
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“急诊石诊所”——改善患者护理:一个基于医院的合作质量改善项目
目前,全国范围内都在努力改善急性输尿管绞痛的治疗。英国泌尿外科医师协会(BAUS)制定的管理目标包括从诊断到最终管理或对预期管理的患者进行临床审查的4周目标。审查我们急性结石服务的动机源于担心我们没有能力始终如一地为患者提供初级明确治疗或及时的临床审查。我们的目标是利用计划-研究法案(PDSA)周期来重组我们的服务,以实现BAUS的目标。将2017年3月至9月期间诊断为输尿管结石的所有患者作为基线进行审查。我们的改进策略包括实施紧急结石诊所(ESC)模式。这是通过主要利益相关者之间的合作制定的,并以每周由顾问领导的专科诊所为中心,该诊所旨在审查所有符合预先商定标准的输尿管结石患者,并为其做出早期管理决策。干预后数据收集于2018年6月至2019年1月。为了评估我们是否能够在新冠肺炎大流行期间实现这些目标,还收集了2020年1月至2020年10月期间的数据。从CT诊断到临床检查的时间从77天减少到9天。确诊后4周内就诊的患者从2.9%改善到90.5%。在需要手术的患者中,接受初级干预的比例增加到72.1%。紧急支架置入从69%减少到27.9%。患者再次出现急诊的比率从3.0次/月减少到1.6次/月。在干预后的第一个周期,在4周内接受最终手术的比例从26.2%提高到51.2%,在疫情期间保持在54.5%。实施ESC模式大大改善了患者护理,并在实现BAUS管理目标方面取得了重大进展,同时减轻了我们急诊科的负担。不适用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1