Does the random inspection reduce audit opinion shopping?

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting China Journal of Accounting Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/21697213.2022.2143685
Guoqing Zhang, Sicen Chen, Pengdong Zhang, Xiaowei Lin
{"title":"Does the random inspection reduce audit opinion shopping?","authors":"Guoqing Zhang, Sicen Chen, Pengdong Zhang, Xiaowei Lin","doi":"10.1080/21697213.2022.2143685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has randomly selected two audit firms each year to check their problems in management and internal control since 2016. Using the random inspections from 2016 to 2018, we construct a staggered DID model and find that the possibility of audit firms engaging in audit opinion shopping decreases after they are inspected. To explore the underlying logic, we document that: (1) the random inspections strengthened audit firms’ management of branch offices, resulting in a more pronounced effect on the practice of branch audit offices; and (2) the policy improved audit firms’ internal control, leading to more pronounced effect in audit firms with a heavy workload and loose control. Further, we show that punishments following the inspections strengthen the basic effect, while the effect of random inspections would be weakened for the big 10 audit firms.","PeriodicalId":37215,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"528 - 548"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2022.2143685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has randomly selected two audit firms each year to check their problems in management and internal control since 2016. Using the random inspections from 2016 to 2018, we construct a staggered DID model and find that the possibility of audit firms engaging in audit opinion shopping decreases after they are inspected. To explore the underlying logic, we document that: (1) the random inspections strengthened audit firms’ management of branch offices, resulting in a more pronounced effect on the practice of branch audit offices; and (2) the policy improved audit firms’ internal control, leading to more pronounced effect in audit firms with a heavy workload and loose control. Further, we show that punishments following the inspections strengthen the basic effect, while the effect of random inspections would be weakened for the big 10 audit firms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抽查是否减少了审核意见采购?
摘要自2016年以来,中国证监会每年随机抽取两家审计事务所对其管理和内部控制方面的问题进行检查。利用2016年至2018年的随机检查,我们构建了一个交错DID模型,发现审计事务所在被检查后参与审计意见购买的可能性降低。为了探究其内在逻辑,我们发现:(1)抽查加强了审计事务所对分支机构的管理,对分支机构审计实践产生了更明显的影响;(2)该政策改善了审计事务所的内部控制,在工作量大、控制松散的审计事务所中效果更为明显。此外,我们还发现,对10大审计事务所来说,检查后的惩罚强化了基本效果,而随机检查的效果会减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
China Journal of Accounting Studies
China Journal of Accounting Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
IPO comment letter responses and stock price volatility in the STAR market Construction of transportation infrastructure and the mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises: based on the perspective of high-speed rail opening Is digital finance always beneficial to accounting information transparency? Evidence from China Categorical listing criteria, co-investment system and growth manipulation: empirical evidence based on the implementation of the registration system of STAR market Does operational disclosure curb textual tone manipulation by corporate management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1