Observing the author–editor relationship: recordkeeping and literary scholarship in dialogue

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Archives and Manuscripts Pub Date : 2019-08-11 DOI:10.1080/01576895.2019.1609363
J. Bunn, S. Rayner
{"title":"Observing the author–editor relationship: recordkeeping and literary scholarship in dialogue","authors":"J. Bunn, S. Rayner","doi":"10.1080/01576895.2019.1609363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the call for papers for this special issue, a lack of dialogue was noted between ‘archivists and literary scholars’. This article has arisen from a collaboration across that divide, between two individuals who between them embody multiple identities of archivist and publisher, archival and literary scholar. The purpose of this collaboration was to establish a common frame of reference which would encompass and give equal weight to the concerns and working contexts of both. To assist in this aim, both researchers agreed that neither the field of archives or of literary scholarship would be privileged. The focus in this study is on the relationship between the author and the editor within the academic publishing sector. With these parameters set as the starting point, research questions were drawn up from both perspectives to guide the project. These questions were, to some extent, addressed, but a more important outcome of the process was the development of a common frame of reference in which to continue the dialogue, through a broader and more abstract idea of the scholarly record and not just one of records as material resources for literary scholarship.","PeriodicalId":43371,"journal":{"name":"Archives and Manuscripts","volume":"47 1","pages":"359 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01576895.2019.1609363","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives and Manuscripts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2019.1609363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the call for papers for this special issue, a lack of dialogue was noted between ‘archivists and literary scholars’. This article has arisen from a collaboration across that divide, between two individuals who between them embody multiple identities of archivist and publisher, archival and literary scholar. The purpose of this collaboration was to establish a common frame of reference which would encompass and give equal weight to the concerns and working contexts of both. To assist in this aim, both researchers agreed that neither the field of archives or of literary scholarship would be privileged. The focus in this study is on the relationship between the author and the editor within the academic publishing sector. With these parameters set as the starting point, research questions were drawn up from both perspectives to guide the project. These questions were, to some extent, addressed, but a more important outcome of the process was the development of a common frame of reference in which to continue the dialogue, through a broader and more abstract idea of the scholarly record and not just one of records as material resources for literary scholarship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
观察作者与编辑的关系:对话中的记录保存与文学学术
摘要在这期特刊的论文征集中,“档案工作者和文学学者”之间缺乏对话。这篇文章产生于跨越这一鸿沟的两个人之间的合作,他们之间体现了档案管理员和出版商、档案馆和文学学者的多重身份。这一合作的目的是建立一个共同的参考框架,涵盖并同等重视两者的关切和工作环境。为了帮助实现这一目标,两位研究人员一致认为,档案或文学学术领域都不享有特权。本研究的重点是学术出版部门中作者和编辑之间的关系。以这些参数为出发点,从两个角度提出了研究问题,以指导该项目。这些问题在某种程度上得到了解决,但这一过程的一个更重要的结果是,通过对学术记录的更广泛和更抽象的概念,而不仅仅是作为文学学术物质资源的记录,制定了一个共同的参考框架,以继续对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives and Manuscripts
Archives and Manuscripts INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Transitioning to open access The Indigenous Archives Collective position statement on the right of reply to Indigenous knowledges and information held in archives Activating and supporting the Tandanya Adelaide Declaration on Indigenous Archives Rancière, political theory and activist community appraisal Towards Transformative Practice in Out of Home Care: Chartering Rights in Recordkeeping
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1