An audit of NSW legislation and policy on the government’s public communications in languages other than English

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW Griffith Law Review Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10383441.2021.1970873
A. Grey, Alyssa A. Severin
{"title":"An audit of NSW legislation and policy on the government’s public communications in languages other than English","authors":"A. Grey, Alyssa A. Severin","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2021.1970873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article reports a 2019–2021 audit of the framework of the NSW government's decisions about their public communications in languages other than English (NSW is an Australian state). It found a dearth of legislation or policy about the language of public government communications, but we present a typology of ways in which NSW law seeks to regulate choice of language in other communications between individuals, non-government entities, and government staff. We then discuss the shortfalls of this decision-making framework, interrogating NSW's statutory Multicultural Principle about linguistic diversity and the haphazard ways that NSW legislation requires language of communication to be considered in relation to the likelihood that an intended audience will understand certain communications. We raise concerns about whether the lack of accountability for non-compliance and leaving the majority of public government communications reliant on informal/reactionary policy is suited to equitably fulfilling the needs of the NSW public. The article closes by arguing that consistent and clear policy to guide the NSW government's public communications would enable the government to more readily meet communicative needs. We thus propose paths for law and policy reform as well as directions for further research aimed at improving government decision-making and communicative efficiency.","PeriodicalId":45376,"journal":{"name":"Griffith Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Griffith Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2021.1970873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article reports a 2019–2021 audit of the framework of the NSW government's decisions about their public communications in languages other than English (NSW is an Australian state). It found a dearth of legislation or policy about the language of public government communications, but we present a typology of ways in which NSW law seeks to regulate choice of language in other communications between individuals, non-government entities, and government staff. We then discuss the shortfalls of this decision-making framework, interrogating NSW's statutory Multicultural Principle about linguistic diversity and the haphazard ways that NSW legislation requires language of communication to be considered in relation to the likelihood that an intended audience will understand certain communications. We raise concerns about whether the lack of accountability for non-compliance and leaving the majority of public government communications reliant on informal/reactionary policy is suited to equitably fulfilling the needs of the NSW public. The article closes by arguing that consistent and clear policy to guide the NSW government's public communications would enable the government to more readily meet communicative needs. We thus propose paths for law and policy reform as well as directions for further research aimed at improving government decision-making and communicative efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对新南威尔士州政府以非英语语言进行公共沟通的立法和政策进行审计
摘要本文报告了2019-2021年对新南威尔士州政府关于英语以外语言的公共沟通决策框架的审计(新南威尔士州是澳大利亚的一个州)。它发现缺乏关于公共政府沟通语言的立法或政策,但我们提出了新南威尔士州法律试图规范个人、非政府实体和政府工作人员之间其他沟通语言选择的类型。然后,我们讨论了这一决策框架的不足之处,质疑新南威尔士州关于语言多样性的法定多元文化原则,以及新南威尔士州立法要求根据预期受众理解某些通信的可能性来考虑通信语言的随意性。我们对缺乏对违规行为的问责以及让大多数公共政府沟通依赖于非正式/反动政策是否适合公平地满足新南威尔士州公众的需求表示担忧。文章最后认为,指导新南威尔士州政府公共沟通的一致而明确的政策将使政府更容易满足沟通需求。因此,我们提出了法律和政策改革的路径,以及旨在提高政府决策和沟通效率的进一步研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Reconceptualising the crimes of Big Tech The current legal regime of the Indonesian outer small islands Mainstreaming climate change in legal education Skeletons in the cupboard: reading settler anxiety in Mabo and Love Post-enlargement (free) movement in the EU: who really counts as EU CITIZEN? understanding Dano through the lens of Orientalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1