The role of insurance at the intersection of Covid-19 and inequality through the lens of the cases: Cafe Chameleon CC v Guardrisk Insurance Company Ltd and Ma-Afrika Hotels (Pty) Ltd v Santam Limited

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW South African Journal on Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02587203.2022.2094829
Judith Katzew
{"title":"The role of insurance at the intersection of Covid-19 and inequality through the lens of the cases: Cafe Chameleon CC v Guardrisk Insurance Company Ltd and Ma-Afrika Hotels (Pty) Ltd v Santam Limited","authors":"Judith Katzew","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2022.2094829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Insurance has the potential to make a positive impact on the financial stability and economic wellbeing of societies. However the Covid-19 pandemic has shone a harsh light on the consequences of both the insurance industry and the state’s failure to fully realise the right of ‘everyone’ to ‘appropriate social assistance’ in terms of s 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. This was brought into sharp focus in the hospitality sector where the failure of insurers to pay business interruption policies resulted in business closures and job losses. An analysis of the business interruption court cases that followed highlights the progressive approach by the courts who applied a contextual and purposive interpretation of the insurance policies. I argue that this is in keeping with the objectives of insurance law set out in the Insurance Act 18 of 2017, which include the alignment of the insurance industry to the values of the Constitution.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"37 1","pages":"492 - 511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2022.2094829","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Insurance has the potential to make a positive impact on the financial stability and economic wellbeing of societies. However the Covid-19 pandemic has shone a harsh light on the consequences of both the insurance industry and the state’s failure to fully realise the right of ‘everyone’ to ‘appropriate social assistance’ in terms of s 27 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. This was brought into sharp focus in the hospitality sector where the failure of insurers to pay business interruption policies resulted in business closures and job losses. An analysis of the business interruption court cases that followed highlights the progressive approach by the courts who applied a contextual and purposive interpretation of the insurance policies. I argue that this is in keeping with the objectives of insurance law set out in the Insurance Act 18 of 2017, which include the alignment of the insurance industry to the values of the Constitution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过案例的视角来审视保险在Covid-19和不平等的交叉点上的作用:Cafe Chameleon CC诉guarrisk insurance Company Ltd和Ma-Afrika Hotels (Pty) Ltd诉Santam Limited
摘要保险有可能对社会的金融稳定和经济福祉产生积极影响。然而,新冠肺炎大流行对保险业和国家未能根据1996年《南非共和国宪法》第27条充分实现“每个人”获得“适当社会援助”的权利的后果造成了严重的影响。这在酒店业引起了极大的关注,保险公司未能支付业务中断保单,导致企业倒闭和失业。对随后的营业中断法庭案件的分析突出了法院对保险单的渐进式解释。我认为,这符合2017年《保险法》第18条规定的保险法目标,其中包括使保险业与宪法价值观保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy Ubuntu, human rights and sustainable development: Lessons from the African Arbitration Academy’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights Augmentative and alternative communication in the South African justice system: Potential and pitfalls The importance of litigating the right to access sufficient food: Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1