Dykes, Disability & Stuff: Queer Ableisms and the Work of Cripqueer Print Cultures

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES Feminist Studies Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI:10.1353/fem.2023.a901594
Jessica Waggoner
{"title":"Dykes, Disability & Stuff: Queer Ableisms and the Work of Cripqueer Print Cultures","authors":"Jessica Waggoner","doi":"10.1353/fem.2023.a901594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Drawing on feminist and queer disability studies methods, this article explores a print archive of disabled lesbian communities through newsletters such as Dykes, Disability & Stuff, and Hikané: The Capable Womon. These publications decentered a lesbian-feminist activism that excluded those who could not protest in public and attend lesbian events in inaccessible spaces. Swapping DIY access technologies, dating stories, and new modes of protest, they forged a print collectivity that cripped narratives of lesbian life. This essay homes in on three major themes that emerge across lesbian print cultures in the late twentieth century. I first discuss the tensions surrounding disability and labor in lesbian land movements, next the ableist elevation of “strength” in disabled and nondisabled lesbian cultures alike, particularly as they pertain to sexual expectations, and I conclude with a discussion of how disabled lesbians of color navigated the terrain between white disability communities and white nondisabled lesbian culture, as well as carceral surveillance. By looking to these queer critiques of ableism, we can understand how they foreground the current fields of crip theory and crip of color critique, and furthermore situate them within a longer genealogy of cripqueer and disability justice organizing.","PeriodicalId":35884,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"59 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/fem.2023.a901594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Drawing on feminist and queer disability studies methods, this article explores a print archive of disabled lesbian communities through newsletters such as Dykes, Disability & Stuff, and Hikané: The Capable Womon. These publications decentered a lesbian-feminist activism that excluded those who could not protest in public and attend lesbian events in inaccessible spaces. Swapping DIY access technologies, dating stories, and new modes of protest, they forged a print collectivity that cripped narratives of lesbian life. This essay homes in on three major themes that emerge across lesbian print cultures in the late twentieth century. I first discuss the tensions surrounding disability and labor in lesbian land movements, next the ableist elevation of “strength” in disabled and nondisabled lesbian cultures alike, particularly as they pertain to sexual expectations, and I conclude with a discussion of how disabled lesbians of color navigated the terrain between white disability communities and white nondisabled lesbian culture, as well as carceral surveillance. By looking to these queer critiques of ableism, we can understand how they foreground the current fields of crip theory and crip of color critique, and furthermore situate them within a longer genealogy of cripqueer and disability justice organizing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dykes,Disability&Stuff:酷儿Ableism与Cripquer印刷文化的工作
摘要:本文借鉴女性主义和酷儿残障研究方法,通过《戴克斯》、《残障与物质》、《hikan:有能力的女人》等时事通讯,探索残障女同性恋群体的纸质档案。这些出版物偏离了女同性恋女权主义运动的中心,这种运动排斥了那些不能在公共场合抗议的人,也排斥了那些不能在难以进入的空间参加女同性恋活动的人。她们通过交换DIY访问技术、约会故事和新的抗议模式,形成了一个印刷集体,削弱了对女同性恋生活的叙述。这篇文章聚焦于二十世纪后期女同性恋版画文化中出现的三个主要主题。我首先讨论了女同性恋土地运动中围绕残疾和劳动的紧张关系,然后讨论了残疾和非残疾女同性恋文化中对“力量”的能动主义提升,特别是当它们与性期望有关时,我最后讨论了有色人种的残疾女同性恋如何在白人残疾社区和白人非残疾女同性恋文化之间导航,以及如何进行监视。通过观察这些酷儿对残疾歧视的批评,我们可以理解它们是如何将当前的酷儿理论和酷儿的颜色批评领域推向前景的,并进一步将它们置于更长的酷儿和残疾正义组织谱系中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Studies
Feminist Studies Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Pleasures of the Hunt / We Must Be Creatures: Toward an Ecofeminist Hunting Ethic What Hungers Call Us Home? Engaging Autotheory Through Food Legal Landscapes Post-Roe: Shifts in Antiabortion Violence and Implications of the face Act Oasis by Necessity: The Post-Dobbs Landscape in Central Illinois "Brutality and its aftermath": Autotheoretical Engagements with Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1