"My class is mine, and I do it my way", empowering EFL teachers through theorizing practice

Q1 Arts and Humanities XLinguae Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.18355/xl.2023.16.02.14
S. Setiawan, Suprapto, Sarmini, A. Munir, S. Weda
{"title":"\"My class is mine, and I do it my way\", empowering EFL teachers through theorizing practice","authors":"S. Setiawan, Suprapto, Sarmini, A. Munir, S. Weda","doi":"10.18355/xl.2023.16.02.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-method pedagogy is often seen as an effective way to help EFL teachers develop their theory of practice. This paper investigated the name of personal practice theory used by EFL teachers, the underlying reasons for using personal practice theory, teachers' perceptions of using personal practice theory, and the implications that may be made from using personal practice theory. This study involved 36 (thirty-six) English teachers teaching at different levels of education in several cities in East Java, Indonesia. This study used qualitative research that helped the researchers to cover a deeper understanding of the data. Furthermore, the researchers gained the data by conducting an open-ended questionnaire through a Google form. The results revealed four main points; 1) most English teachers recognize their theories and label their theories, but some of them theorize their practice, but they use flexible methods; 2) the adoption of the personal theory was justified based on needs, ease of learning, heterogeneous classes, students' abilities, producing enjoyable learning, familiarizing students with good English, and improvement, 3) the majority of teachers had positive views on the use of personal practice theory, like students are easier to comprehend learning materials, and 4) the use of personal practice theory had a positive effect on a variety of student outcomes. This study might contribute to the English language teaching field that theorizing practice is essential to establishing a meaningful learning environment. Finally, this study suggests that English teachers should reflect on their practice in creating their theory to improve their professional growth.","PeriodicalId":53512,"journal":{"name":"XLinguae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"XLinguae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18355/xl.2023.16.02.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-method pedagogy is often seen as an effective way to help EFL teachers develop their theory of practice. This paper investigated the name of personal practice theory used by EFL teachers, the underlying reasons for using personal practice theory, teachers' perceptions of using personal practice theory, and the implications that may be made from using personal practice theory. This study involved 36 (thirty-six) English teachers teaching at different levels of education in several cities in East Java, Indonesia. This study used qualitative research that helped the researchers to cover a deeper understanding of the data. Furthermore, the researchers gained the data by conducting an open-ended questionnaire through a Google form. The results revealed four main points; 1) most English teachers recognize their theories and label their theories, but some of them theorize their practice, but they use flexible methods; 2) the adoption of the personal theory was justified based on needs, ease of learning, heterogeneous classes, students' abilities, producing enjoyable learning, familiarizing students with good English, and improvement, 3) the majority of teachers had positive views on the use of personal practice theory, like students are easier to comprehend learning materials, and 4) the use of personal practice theory had a positive effect on a variety of student outcomes. This study might contribute to the English language teaching field that theorizing practice is essential to establishing a meaningful learning environment. Finally, this study suggests that English teachers should reflect on their practice in creating their theory to improve their professional growth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我的课是我的,我用我的方式”,通过理论实践赋予英语教师力量
后方法教学法通常被视为帮助英语教师发展实践理论的有效途径。本文调查了英语教师使用个人实践理论的名称、使用个人实践理论的潜在原因、教师使用个人实践理论的看法以及使用个人实践理论可能产生的启示。本研究涉及印度尼西亚东爪哇几个城市的36(36)名不同教育水平的英语教师。这项研究使用了定性研究,帮助研究人员对数据有了更深入的了解。此外,研究人员还通过谷歌表格进行了开放式问卷调查,获得了数据。结果揭示了四个要点;1)大多数英语教师承认自己的理论,给自己的理论贴上标签,但也有一部分教师将自己的实践理论化,但方法比较灵活;2)采用个人实践理论的理由是基于需求、易学性、班级异质性、学生的能力、产生愉快的学习、使学生熟悉良好的英语和提高;3)大多数教师对使用个人实践理论持积极态度,如学生更容易理解学习材料;4)使用个人实践理论对学生的各项成绩有积极的影响。本研究对英语教学有一定的启示,即理论化的实践对于建立有意义的学习环境至关重要。最后,本研究建议英语教师在创造理论的过程中反思自己的实践,以促进自己的专业成长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
XLinguae
XLinguae Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The XLinguae (ISSN 2453-711X online, ISSN 1337-8384 print) is the European scientific language double-blind peer-reviewed journal covering philosophy, linguistics, applied linguistics fields on Modern European languages. It is published by the Slovenská Vzdelávacia a Obstarávacia s.r.o., Nitra, with frequency of 4 issues per year: January + Special Issue, April, June, and October. The main objective of the Journal is to promote and sustain the language and culture diversity.
期刊最新文献
http://xlinguae.eu/2024_17_1_11.html LECOLE algorithm: readability, readability, and comprehensibility in Spanish The use of ChatGPT in creative writing assistance Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) to create language exam questions: A case study On directive acts among Arek-dialect Javanese speakers: A politeness aspect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1