Rotator Cuff Repair: How Many Rows?

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.otsm.2023.150980
Edward Bowen , Answorth Allen , Asheesh Bedi
{"title":"Rotator Cuff Repair: How Many Rows?","authors":"Edward Bowen ,&nbsp;Answorth Allen ,&nbsp;Asheesh Bedi","doi":"10.1016/j.otsm.2023.150980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Technical considerations of the rotator cuff repair remain of great importance as retear rates remain high. The double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair was designed to better restore the native enthesis footprint to maximize healing. The DR repair features a medial and lateral row of suture anchors. Anatomical and cadaveric studies have demonstrated improved footprint restoration with DR repair. Biomechanically, the DR repair has a superior load to failure, decreased gap formation under cyclic loading, and greater contact areas and pressures. It is unclear whether the number of sutures per anchor may be more important than the number of rows and the row configuration. Medial row knots and suture tape constructs may improve the biomechanics of the repair, but the impact on clinical outcomes is unknown. High-quality clinical studies have shown that the DR repair in small to medium tears does not yield better clinical outcomes than the single-row (SR) and is not cost-effective. Healing rates seem to improve with the DR repair, and retear rates may be slightly reduced. However, in larger tears, the DR repair demonstrates favorable clinical outcomes with significant increases in functional scores, healing rates, and retear rates compared to SR repair. Although the DR repair has biomechanical advantages to SR constructs, clinical evidence suggests that the double-row repair should be reserved for large to massive tear patterns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54678,"journal":{"name":"Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"Article 150980"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060187223000047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Technical considerations of the rotator cuff repair remain of great importance as retear rates remain high. The double-row (DR) rotator cuff repair was designed to better restore the native enthesis footprint to maximize healing. The DR repair features a medial and lateral row of suture anchors. Anatomical and cadaveric studies have demonstrated improved footprint restoration with DR repair. Biomechanically, the DR repair has a superior load to failure, decreased gap formation under cyclic loading, and greater contact areas and pressures. It is unclear whether the number of sutures per anchor may be more important than the number of rows and the row configuration. Medial row knots and suture tape constructs may improve the biomechanics of the repair, but the impact on clinical outcomes is unknown. High-quality clinical studies have shown that the DR repair in small to medium tears does not yield better clinical outcomes than the single-row (SR) and is not cost-effective. Healing rates seem to improve with the DR repair, and retear rates may be slightly reduced. However, in larger tears, the DR repair demonstrates favorable clinical outcomes with significant increases in functional scores, healing rates, and retear rates compared to SR repair. Although the DR repair has biomechanical advantages to SR constructs, clinical evidence suggests that the double-row repair should be reserved for large to massive tear patterns.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩袖修复:多少行?
由于撕裂率仍然很高,肌腱套修复的技术考虑仍然非常重要。双排(DR)肩袖修复的目的是更好地恢复固有的髋臼足迹,以最大限度地愈合。DR修复的特点是在内侧和外侧行缝合锚钉。解剖和尸体研究表明,DR修复改善了足迹恢复。从生物力学角度来看,DR修复具有更好的失效载荷,减少循环载荷下的间隙形成,以及更大的接触面积和压力。目前尚不清楚每个锚点的缝合线数是否比行数和行结构更重要。内侧排结和缝合带结构可以改善修复的生物力学,但对临床结果的影响尚不清楚。高质量的临床研究表明,在小到中等撕裂中,DR修复并不比单排(SR)修复产生更好的临床效果,并且不具有成本效益。愈合率似乎随着DR的修复而提高,而再撕裂率可能会略有降低。然而,在较大的撕裂中,与SR修复相比,DR修复显示出良好的临床结果,功能评分、愈合率和撕裂率显著提高。尽管双排修复在生物力学上比双排修复有优势,但临床证据表明双排修复应用于大到大面积撕裂模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine combines the authority of a textbook, the usefulness of a color atlas and the timeliness of a journal. Each issue focuses on a single clinical condition, offering several different management approaches. It''s the easiest way for practitioners to stay informed of the latest surgical advancements and developments.
期刊最新文献
Hip Injuries in the Pediatric Athlete—Pelvic Apophyseal Avulsions Addressing Extra-Articular Impingement in the Athlete Revision Hip Arthroscopy: Getting It Right the Second Time Managing the Hip in Supraphysiologic Motion Athletes Arthroscopic Labral Management: Ignore, Debride, Repair or Reconstruct
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1