{"title":"A Group Psychoanalytic Approach to the Social Dreaming Matrix: A Found-and-Created Device","authors":"Hana Salaam Abdel-Malek","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To differentiate the <i>Social Dreaming Matrix</i> from Group Relations Conferences, Gordon Lawrence provided a specific denomination, framework and primary task. Despite these new parameters, Lawrence understood that group dynamics persisted in the Matrix, perceiving social dreaming and group dynamics as two lenses of a binocular informing the Matrix. However, to fulfil the Matrix's primary task of accessing the social unconscious, he advocated a non-psychoanalytic monocular vision emphasizing social dreaming. In this article, I argue that the <i>Social Dreaming Matrix</i> and the <i>Dream Reflection Dialogue</i> that follows are, from a psychoanalytic perspective, two moments of a group whose primary task is <i>Social Dreaming</i>. Looking from a psychoanalytic perspective through the two lenses of social dreaming and group dynamics provides a wider perspective of the social unconscious, generating insights. This group psychoanalytic approach is a <i>found-and-created</i> framework rediscovering and recreating the <i>object-Social Dreaming Matrix</i> framework proposed by Lawrence. To support this argument, I analysed a series of <i>Social Dreaming Matrixes</i> and <i>Dream Reflection</i> Dialogues occurring during a social dreaming training programme to show how the unfolding group dynamics revealed the social unconscious as did social dreaming.</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"39 4","pages":"732-750"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To differentiate the Social Dreaming Matrix from Group Relations Conferences, Gordon Lawrence provided a specific denomination, framework and primary task. Despite these new parameters, Lawrence understood that group dynamics persisted in the Matrix, perceiving social dreaming and group dynamics as two lenses of a binocular informing the Matrix. However, to fulfil the Matrix's primary task of accessing the social unconscious, he advocated a non-psychoanalytic monocular vision emphasizing social dreaming. In this article, I argue that the Social Dreaming Matrix and the Dream Reflection Dialogue that follows are, from a psychoanalytic perspective, two moments of a group whose primary task is Social Dreaming. Looking from a psychoanalytic perspective through the two lenses of social dreaming and group dynamics provides a wider perspective of the social unconscious, generating insights. This group psychoanalytic approach is a found-and-created framework rediscovering and recreating the object-Social Dreaming Matrix framework proposed by Lawrence. To support this argument, I analysed a series of Social Dreaming Matrixes and Dream Reflection Dialogues occurring during a social dreaming training programme to show how the unfolding group dynamics revealed the social unconscious as did social dreaming.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.