Medical Residents' Practices and Perceptions toward Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR)Order

Muneerah M. Albugami, H. Bassil, Ulrike Laudon, Abeer Ibrahim, Abdelazeim Elamin, Usamah Elalem, M. Siddiquee, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, A. Alshehri
{"title":"Medical Residents' Practices and Perceptions toward Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR)Order","authors":"Muneerah M. Albugami, H. Bassil, Ulrike Laudon, Abeer Ibrahim, Abdelazeim Elamin, Usamah Elalem, M. Siddiquee, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, A. Alshehri","doi":"10.4172/2165-7386.1000295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The knowledge and implementation skills of the DNR order amongst physicians in training appear to be quite variable. Few studies had assessed residents' views on this complex topic. Our objective was to describe the medical residents’ practices and perceptions toward DNR order. A 26 question survey was distributed to medical residents during the academic day activity. Only 56 residents completed the questionnaire (75% response rate). 61.40% of the residents understood the definition of DNR order. 85.96% thought physicians shouldn’t order diagnostic tests for DNR patients and 92.98% thought physicians shouldn’t give blood products and antibiotics to DNR patients. 45.61% thought DNR order would lead to poor care. 36.84% thought physician alone should decide about the DNR decision. 45.61% answered that DNR order never discussed with patients. 64.91% answered that consultant discussed DNR order with patients. 42.11% of residents were involved in the discussion of DNR order. 66.67% answered that time to decide about the DNR order on day of admission. 42.11% answered there was variation between consultants regarding the care of DNR patient. 43.86% answered there was variation in the clinical care before and after DNR order was placed. 87.72% thought here was a need for formal training in DNR discussion. 68.42% didn’t know if KFSH and RC had clinical guidelines for DNR patients care. \nConclusion: (1) Majority of the residents had misunderstanding regarding DNR patient care and comfortable care. There is a need for developing a structured residency program curriculum to address resident skills in end-oflife care. (2) Encouraged discussions DNR issues in the outpatient setting could prevent unwanted resuscitation in the acute setting. (3) Efforts are needed to increase patients and their families’ awareness about the meaning of DNR order. (4) There is a need to unify and improve quality of care provided to DNR patients by developing specific strategies within a framework of goals of care.","PeriodicalId":91127,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative care & medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2165-7386.1000295","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative care & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-7386.1000295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The knowledge and implementation skills of the DNR order amongst physicians in training appear to be quite variable. Few studies had assessed residents' views on this complex topic. Our objective was to describe the medical residents’ practices and perceptions toward DNR order. A 26 question survey was distributed to medical residents during the academic day activity. Only 56 residents completed the questionnaire (75% response rate). 61.40% of the residents understood the definition of DNR order. 85.96% thought physicians shouldn’t order diagnostic tests for DNR patients and 92.98% thought physicians shouldn’t give blood products and antibiotics to DNR patients. 45.61% thought DNR order would lead to poor care. 36.84% thought physician alone should decide about the DNR decision. 45.61% answered that DNR order never discussed with patients. 64.91% answered that consultant discussed DNR order with patients. 42.11% of residents were involved in the discussion of DNR order. 66.67% answered that time to decide about the DNR order on day of admission. 42.11% answered there was variation between consultants regarding the care of DNR patient. 43.86% answered there was variation in the clinical care before and after DNR order was placed. 87.72% thought here was a need for formal training in DNR discussion. 68.42% didn’t know if KFSH and RC had clinical guidelines for DNR patients care. Conclusion: (1) Majority of the residents had misunderstanding regarding DNR patient care and comfortable care. There is a need for developing a structured residency program curriculum to address resident skills in end-oflife care. (2) Encouraged discussions DNR issues in the outpatient setting could prevent unwanted resuscitation in the acute setting. (3) Efforts are needed to increase patients and their families’ awareness about the meaning of DNR order. (4) There is a need to unify and improve quality of care provided to DNR patients by developing specific strategies within a framework of goals of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院医师对不抢救(DNR)令的实践与认知
在接受培训的医生中,DNR命令的知识和实施技能似乎变化很大。很少有研究评估居民对这个复杂话题的看法。我们的目的是描述住院医师对DNR秩序的做法和看法。在学术日活动期间,向住院医生分发了一份26个问题的调查。只有56名居民完成了问卷调查(75%的回答率)。61.40%的居民理解DNR秩序的定义。85.96%的人认为医生不应该为DNR患者进行诊断测试,92.98%的人认为医师不应该给DNR患者服用血液制品和抗生素。45.61%的人认为DNR命令会导致护理不善。36.84%的人认为应该由医生单独决定DNR的决定。45.61%的人回答DNR命令从未与患者讨论过。64.91%的人回答顾问与患者讨论了DNR顺序。42.11%的居民参与了对DNR命令的讨论。66.67%的人在入院当天回答了决定DNR命令的时间。42.11%的人回答说,顾问之间对DNR患者的护理存在差异。43.86%的人回答说,在下达DNR命令前后,临床护理存在差异。87.72%的人认为需要在DNR讨论中进行正式培训。68.42%的人不知道KFSH和RC是否有DNR患者护理的临床指南。结论:(1)绝大多数居民对DNR患者护理和舒适护理存在误解。有必要制定一个结构化的住院医师课程,以解决临终关怀中的住院医师技能问题。(2) 鼓励在门诊环境中讨论DNR问题可以防止在急性环境中进行不必要的复苏。(3) 需要努力提高患者及其家属对DNR命令含义的认识。(4) 需要通过在护理目标框架内制定具体策略,统一并提高为DNR患者提供的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is type 2 Diabetes a Hereditary Condition? Causes, Genes, and Preventative Measures. Evaluation of Factors Influencing Breastfeeding in Children Aged 0 to 24 Months Received in an Urban Community Health Center in Abidjan Cocody (Cote d'Ivoire) Effect of Matrix Rhythm Therapy in B/L Adductor Muscle Tightness in Pediatric Cerebral Palsy: A Case Report The Application of Combined Quality of Control Circle for Acute Spinal Cord Injury Silver Linings: The Experience of Hope in Dyads with Motor Neuron Disease. An Explorative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1