Article: The Age-Old Distinction Between Public and Private Limited Liability Companies: Should It Stay or Should It Go?: A figment of academics’ imaginations

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW European Company Law Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.54648/eucl2023001
H. van Delft, S. Renssen
{"title":"Article: The Age-Old Distinction Between Public and Private Limited Liability Companies: Should It Stay or Should It Go?: A figment of academics’ imaginations","authors":"H. van Delft, S. Renssen","doi":"10.54648/eucl2023001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to answer the question whether the distinction between public and private companies is still needed or whether it is outdated. The question will be answered from an EU perspective, while taking the Dutch legal system as a leading example. In the Netherlands, there was a huge time-gap between the introduction of the public company in 1811 and the introduction of the private company in 1971, 160 years later. This seems to justify the question whether we needed the private company at all.\nPublic company, private company, minimum capital requirement, capital maintenance rules, bearer shares, registered shares","PeriodicalId":11843,"journal":{"name":"European Company Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Company Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eucl2023001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article attempts to answer the question whether the distinction between public and private companies is still needed or whether it is outdated. The question will be answered from an EU perspective, while taking the Dutch legal system as a leading example. In the Netherlands, there was a huge time-gap between the introduction of the public company in 1811 and the introduction of the private company in 1971, 160 years later. This seems to justify the question whether we needed the private company at all. Public company, private company, minimum capital requirement, capital maintenance rules, bearer shares, registered shares
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文章:公共有限责任公司和私人有限责任公司之间古老的区别:应该保留还是应该放弃?:学者们的想象
本文试图回答这样一个问题:区分上市公司和私营公司是否仍然需要,或者是否已经过时。这个问题将从欧盟的角度来回答,并以荷兰的法律制度为例。在荷兰,从1811年引入上市公司到160年后的1971年引入私人公司之间存在着巨大的时间差距。这似乎证明了我们是否需要私人公司这个问题是正确的。上市公司,私人公司,最低资本要求,资本维持规则,无记名股份,记名股份
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Loyalty Shares and Loyalty Voting Article: Report on Elverding Conference 2023 on Enhancing Sustainable Business and Corporate Regulation in the EU The CSDD, Oversight Liability and Risk Management Systems The Potential Impact of the CSRD and Other Sustainability Legislation on Listed Companies Tilted Balance to Security or Economy? A Comparative Study of National Security Review Mechanisms in the Netherlands and the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1