Certified to Evaluate: Exploring Administrator Accuracy and Beliefs in Teacher Observation

Q3 Social Sciences ETS Research Report Series Pub Date : 2021-03-29 DOI:10.1002/ets2.12316
Nathan Jones, Courtney Bell, Yi Qi, Jennifer Lewis, David Kirui, Leslie Stickler, Amanda Redash
{"title":"Certified to Evaluate: Exploring Administrator Accuracy and Beliefs in Teacher Observation","authors":"Nathan Jones,&nbsp;Courtney Bell,&nbsp;Yi Qi,&nbsp;Jennifer Lewis,&nbsp;David Kirui,&nbsp;Leslie Stickler,&nbsp;Amanda Redash","doi":"10.1002/ets2.12316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The observation systems being used in all 50 states require administrators to learn to accurately and reliably score their teachers' instruction using standardized observation systems. Although the literature on observation systems is growing, relatively few studies have examined the outcomes of trainings focused on developing administrators' accuracy using observation systems and the administrators' perceptions of that training. Therefore, the focus of this study is on examining administrators' efforts to become accurate and reliable within the context of a comprehensive teacher evaluation reform. This study was conducted during the year-long training and implementation of a new observation system in the context of a large urban district's teacher evaluation reform. The study brings together data on the outcomes of the district training—results on a certification exercise from all administrators in the district—with two sources of data on administrators' perceptions and beliefs. Specifically, we collected fall and spring survey data from nearly 300 administrators and longitudinal interview data from a subsample of 24 administrators. Taken together, these data allowed us to investigate administrators' responses to training and low-stakes practice using the observation process over 1 year. At the end of initial training, administrators reported high levels of learning, particularly in domains aligned with the focus of training. Over the year, administrators reported increased facility with the routines of conducting observations, but they still expressed learning needs, many related to the content of the observation framework. However, results from the training certification test suggested lower than desired levels of accuracy and reliability; administrators regularly did not agree with each other or with master raters. The certification test results suggested that even with a significant investment in administrator learning, there was more to be learned and mastered. If we hope for teacher evaluation to lead to the types of changes in teaching and learning that reformers have envisioned, policymakers and practitioners alike will need to devote time and resources to supporting administrator learning in initial training and throughout administrator use in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11972,"journal":{"name":"ETS Research Report Series","volume":"2021 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ets2.12316","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETS Research Report Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ets2.12316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The observation systems being used in all 50 states require administrators to learn to accurately and reliably score their teachers' instruction using standardized observation systems. Although the literature on observation systems is growing, relatively few studies have examined the outcomes of trainings focused on developing administrators' accuracy using observation systems and the administrators' perceptions of that training. Therefore, the focus of this study is on examining administrators' efforts to become accurate and reliable within the context of a comprehensive teacher evaluation reform. This study was conducted during the year-long training and implementation of a new observation system in the context of a large urban district's teacher evaluation reform. The study brings together data on the outcomes of the district training—results on a certification exercise from all administrators in the district—with two sources of data on administrators' perceptions and beliefs. Specifically, we collected fall and spring survey data from nearly 300 administrators and longitudinal interview data from a subsample of 24 administrators. Taken together, these data allowed us to investigate administrators' responses to training and low-stakes practice using the observation process over 1 year. At the end of initial training, administrators reported high levels of learning, particularly in domains aligned with the focus of training. Over the year, administrators reported increased facility with the routines of conducting observations, but they still expressed learning needs, many related to the content of the observation framework. However, results from the training certification test suggested lower than desired levels of accuracy and reliability; administrators regularly did not agree with each other or with master raters. The certification test results suggested that even with a significant investment in administrator learning, there was more to be learned and mastered. If we hope for teacher evaluation to lead to the types of changes in teaching and learning that reformers have envisioned, policymakers and practitioners alike will need to devote time and resources to supporting administrator learning in initial training and throughout administrator use in practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认证评估:探索管理者在教师观察中的准确性和信念
所有50个州都在使用的观察系统要求管理人员学会使用标准化的观察系统准确可靠地为教师的教学打分。虽然关于观察系统的文献越来越多,但相对较少的研究审查了侧重于发展使用观察系统的管理人员的准确性和管理人员对该培训的看法的培训的结果。因此,本研究的重点是在全面教师评价改革的背景下,检查管理者为变得准确和可靠所做的努力。本研究是在一个大型城市地区教师评价改革背景下为期一年的新观察系统的培训和实施期间进行的。该研究汇集了地区培训结果的数据-地区所有行政人员的认证结果-以及行政人员的认知和信念的两个数据来源。具体来说,我们收集了来自近300名管理人员的秋季和春季调查数据,以及来自24名管理人员的纵向访谈数据。综上所述,这些数据使我们能够使用超过1年的观察过程来调查管理人员对培训和低风险实践的反应。在初始培训结束时,管理人员报告了高水平的学习,特别是在与培训重点一致的领域。在过去的一年里,管理人员报告说,他们在进行观察的日常工作方面增加了便利,但他们仍然表达了学习需求,其中许多与观察框架的内容有关。然而,培训认证测试的结果表明,准确性和可靠性低于预期水平;管理人员经常不同意彼此或主评级。认证测试结果表明,即使在管理员学习方面进行了大量投资,仍然有更多的东西需要学习和掌握。如果我们希望教师评价能带来改革者所设想的教与学的变化,政策制定者和实践者都需要投入时间和资源,在最初的培训和整个实践中支持管理者的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ETS Research Report Series
ETS Research Report Series Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Building a Validity Argument for the TOEFL Junior® Tests Validity, Reliability, and Fairness Evidence for the JD‐Next Exam Practical Considerations in Item Calibration With Small Samples Under Multistage Test Design: A Case Study Practical Considerations in Item Calibration With Small Samples Under Multistage Test Design: A Case Study Modeling Writing Traits in a Formative Essay Corpus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1