Member-serving associations: the co-creation of professionalism and expertise within a field

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Voluntary Sector Review Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.1332/204080521x16675565628948
Kandyce Fernandez, Tina Castellanos
{"title":"Member-serving associations: the co-creation of professionalism and expertise within a field","authors":"Kandyce Fernandez, Tina Castellanos","doi":"10.1332/204080521x16675565628948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional associations are charged with legitimising the fields they represent by attracting and serving members and establishing them as experts in a field. But how do professional associations support both field professionalisation and individual member expertise? Does membership of a professional association contribute to enhanced feelings of expertise? To explore these questions, participants from three allied health professions in the United States – registered dietitians, speech–language pathologists and International Board certified lactation consultants – were recruited to evaluate whether members feel as though their non-profit professional association is meeting these goals. Through a qualitative study involving 30 interviews with members and non-members, we found that professional associations are co-creating their fields with members through advocacy, promotion, education, feedback and adjustment. However, more work is needed to support efforts to co-create feelings of expertise among members. The findings provide insights for future research on member-serving associations.","PeriodicalId":45084,"journal":{"name":"Voluntary Sector Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voluntary Sector Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204080521x16675565628948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professional associations are charged with legitimising the fields they represent by attracting and serving members and establishing them as experts in a field. But how do professional associations support both field professionalisation and individual member expertise? Does membership of a professional association contribute to enhanced feelings of expertise? To explore these questions, participants from three allied health professions in the United States – registered dietitians, speech–language pathologists and International Board certified lactation consultants – were recruited to evaluate whether members feel as though their non-profit professional association is meeting these goals. Through a qualitative study involving 30 interviews with members and non-members, we found that professional associations are co-creating their fields with members through advocacy, promotion, education, feedback and adjustment. However, more work is needed to support efforts to co-create feelings of expertise among members. The findings provide insights for future research on member-serving associations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
会员服务协会:在一个领域内共同创造专业精神和专业知识
专业协会负责通过吸引和服务会员并将其培养为某一领域的专家,使其所代表的领域合法化。但是,专业协会如何支持领域专业化和个人成员专业知识?加入专业协会是否有助于增强专业知识感?为了探讨这些问题,来自美国三个联合健康专业的参与者——注册营养师、言语语言病理学家和国际委员会认证的哺乳顾问——被招募来评估成员是否觉得他们的非营利专业协会正在实现这些目标。通过对会员和非会员的30次访谈进行的定性研究,我们发现专业协会正在通过宣传、推广、教育、反馈和调整与会员共同创造自己的领域。然而,还需要做更多的工作来支持在成员之间共同创造专业知识感的努力。这些发现为未来对会员服务协会的研究提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voluntary Sector Review
Voluntary Sector Review SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
40.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The journal covers the full range of issues relevant to voluntary sector studies, including: definitional and theoretical debates; management and organisational development; financial and human resources; philanthropy; volunteering and employment; regulation and charity law; service delivery; civic engagement; industry and sub-sector dimensions; relations with other sectors; social enterprise; evaluation and impact. Voluntary Sector Review covers voluntary sector studies from a variety of disciplines, including sociology, social policy, politics, psychology, economics, business studies, social anthropology, philosophy and ethics. The journal includes work from the UK and Europe, and beyond, where cross-national comparisons are illuminating. With dedicated expert policy and practice sections, Voluntary Sector Review also provides an essential forum for the exchange of ideas and new thinking.
期刊最新文献
The role of NGOs in homelessness services in Greece Collective co-production of health and care services – a systematic review of research from the United Kingdom, Germany and Norway The role of NGOs in homelessness services in Greece Collective co-production of health and care services – a systematic review of research from the United Kingdom, Germany and Norway Explaining a decline in volunteering in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1