The MANTA vascular closure device in transfemoral TAVI: a real-world cohort

Sofia Martinho, E. Jorge, V. Marinho, R. Baptista, Marco Costa, and Lino Gonçalves
{"title":"The MANTA vascular closure device in transfemoral TAVI: a real-world cohort","authors":"Sofia Martinho, E. Jorge, V. Marinho, R. Baptista, Marco Costa, and Lino Gonçalves","doi":"10.24875/recice.m23000380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment option for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis often performed via transfemoral access route (TF-TAVI). Therefore, successful closure of large-bore access sites is essential. This study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA (Teleflex/Essential Medical, United States) vascular closure device (VCD) in patients undergoing TF-TAVI in an unselected and consecutive cohort of patients. Methods: We conducted a single-center, observational study of 245 consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVI in whom the arterial large-bore femoral access was closed with a MANTA device from March 2020 through February 2022. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the rate of VCD failure according to the VARC-3 definition. Results: Successful closure of the large-bore access site occurred in 92.2% of the patients (n = 226). According to the VARC-3 definition, no major vascular or bleeding complications related to the plug-based VCD were reported. Patients with failed VCDs (7.8%) had significantly smaller minimal femoral artery diameters (6.6 ± 1.1 mm vs 7.6 ± 1.4 mm; P = .005) and consequently, significant higher sheath-to-femoral artery diameter ratios (0.78 ± 0.16 vs 0.69 ± 0.15; P = .019). No other inter-group differences were found. Conclusions: In this single-center, real-world, unselected large cohort of consecutive patients treated with TF-TAVI, a plug-based VCD for large-bore arteriotomy closure turned out effective and safe, and enabled arterial access-site management with a low rate of complications.","PeriodicalId":34613,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/recice.m23000380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment option for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis often performed via transfemoral access route (TF-TAVI). Therefore, successful closure of large-bore access sites is essential. This study aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA (Teleflex/Essential Medical, United States) vascular closure device (VCD) in patients undergoing TF-TAVI in an unselected and consecutive cohort of patients. Methods: We conducted a single-center, observational study of 245 consecutive patients undergoing TF-TAVI in whom the arterial large-bore femoral access was closed with a MANTA device from March 2020 through February 2022. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the rate of VCD failure according to the VARC-3 definition. Results: Successful closure of the large-bore access site occurred in 92.2% of the patients (n = 226). According to the VARC-3 definition, no major vascular or bleeding complications related to the plug-based VCD were reported. Patients with failed VCDs (7.8%) had significantly smaller minimal femoral artery diameters (6.6 ± 1.1 mm vs 7.6 ± 1.4 mm; P = .005) and consequently, significant higher sheath-to-femoral artery diameter ratios (0.78 ± 0.16 vs 0.69 ± 0.15; P = .019). No other inter-group differences were found. Conclusions: In this single-center, real-world, unselected large cohort of consecutive patients treated with TF-TAVI, a plug-based VCD for large-bore arteriotomy closure turned out effective and safe, and enabled arterial access-site management with a low rate of complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MANTA血管闭合装置在经股TAVI中的应用:一个真实世界的队列
引言和目的:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是症状性严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的一种既定治疗选择,通常通过经股动脉途径(TF-TAVI)进行。因此,成功关闭大口径接入点至关重要。本研究旨在调查MANTA(美国Teleflex/Essential Medical)血管闭合装置(VCD)在未经选择的连续患者队列中接受TF-TAVI的患者中的安全性和有效性。方法:我们对245名连续接受TF-TAVI的患者进行了一项单中心观察性研究,这些患者在2020年3月至2022年2月期间使用MANTA装置关闭了动脉大径股动脉通路。根据VARC-3的定义,主要疗效指标是VCD失败率。结果:92.2%的患者(n=226)成功闭合了大口径进入部位。根据VARC-3的定义,没有报告与基于栓塞的VCD相关的主要血管或出血并发症。VCD失败的患者(7.8%)的最小股动脉直径显著较小(6.6±1.1 mm vs 7.6±1.4 mm;P=0.005),因此鞘管与股动脉的直径比显著较高(0.78±0.16 vs 0.69±0.15;P=0.019)。未发现其他组间差异。结论:在这个由TF-TAVI治疗的单中心、真实世界、未经选择的连续大队列患者中,一种用于大口径动脉切开术闭合的基于栓塞的VCD是有效和安全的,并且能够以较低的并发症发生率管理动脉入路部位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed
REC Interventional Cardiology English Ed Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impella-Clip: a secure and effective strategy in cardiogenic shock due to acute severe mitral regurgitation. Case resolution New TAVI technique for difficult valve crossing Marking a milestone. REC: Interventional Cardiology assigned its first impact factor Cardiac catheterization activity in pediatric cardiac transplantation. Can catheterization needs be predicted? The PULSTA valve in native right ventricular outflow tract: initial experience in 3 Spanish hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1