The dangerous rise of Land Grabbing through Climate Change Mitigation policies: the examples of Biofuel and REDD+

Giulia Parola
{"title":"The dangerous rise of Land Grabbing through Climate Change Mitigation policies: the examples of Biofuel and REDD+","authors":"Giulia Parola","doi":"10.4013/RECHTD.2020.123.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to investigate the interconnections between climate change and land grabbing. It offers a nuanced understanding of the critical intersections of climate change mitigation policies with land grabbing, before and after the Paris Agreement. There are various considerations associated with climate change that drive land grabbing tendencies. This increase of land grabbing has been observed to exacerbate climate change and the recurrence of strategies that produce harmful effects on socio-ecological systems. The term ‘climate grabbing’ is coined to describe the phenomena related to the appropriation of land and resources for the purposes of climate change mitigation. In particular, this paper will focus on two instruments that have been created to manage the complications of climate change and have been reinforced by the Paris Agreement in 2015: biofuel production and the Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation Plus initiatives (REDD+). The article will analyse how those measures increase the phenomenon of land grabbing.","PeriodicalId":53186,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito","volume":"12 1","pages":"568-582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermeneutica e Teoria do Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4013/RECHTD.2020.123.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper seeks to investigate the interconnections between climate change and land grabbing. It offers a nuanced understanding of the critical intersections of climate change mitigation policies with land grabbing, before and after the Paris Agreement. There are various considerations associated with climate change that drive land grabbing tendencies. This increase of land grabbing has been observed to exacerbate climate change and the recurrence of strategies that produce harmful effects on socio-ecological systems. The term ‘climate grabbing’ is coined to describe the phenomena related to the appropriation of land and resources for the purposes of climate change mitigation. In particular, this paper will focus on two instruments that have been created to manage the complications of climate change and have been reinforced by the Paris Agreement in 2015: biofuel production and the Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation Plus initiatives (REDD+). The article will analyse how those measures increase the phenomenon of land grabbing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过减缓气候变化政策掠夺土地的危险增加:生物燃料和REDD的例子+
本文试图调查气候变化与土地掠夺之间的相互关系。它细致入微地了解了《巴黎协定》前后气候变化缓解政策与土地掠夺的关键交叉点。与气候变化相关的各种考虑因素推动了土地掠夺趋势。据观察,这种土地掠夺的增加加剧了气候变化,并再次出现对社会生态系统产生有害影响的战略。“气候掠夺”一词是用来描述为缓解气候变化而侵占土地和资源的现象。特别是,本文将重点关注为应对气候变化的复杂性而制定的两项文书,这两项文书已被2015年的《巴黎协定》所加强:生物燃料生产和减少森林砍伐和森林退化排放+倡议(REDD+)。文章将分析这些措施如何加剧土地掠夺现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Estudos Constitucionais, Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito (RECHTD) is published by UNISINOS three times a year and it aims to publish original research papers, articles for discussion and book reviews in the following areas: Hermeneutics, Constitution and Realization of Rights; Society, New Rights and Transnationalization. The articles or unpublished papers will be published in the language they were submitted and will be evaluated by at least two reviewers using the double blind review system. In other words, during the evaluation process the author’s name will not be revealed to the referees and neither the referees’ names will be revealed to the author.
期刊最新文献
As controvérsias entre moral e a indenização por danos morais com a responsabilidade objetiva civil do Estado no tratamento com hidroxicloroquina e ivermectina para a Covid-19 no Brasil Estado de cosas inconstitucional y sistema penitenciario y carcelario de Colombia Apresentação constitutionalism “of” the Global South? Epistemological reflections on emerging constitutional trends Constitutional theory and the limits to the punitive power: the Italian case of prisoners’ right to judicial protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1