The Effects of Psychosocial Stress and Sex Differences on Cognitive Effort Avoidance

Noa Givon
{"title":"The Effects of Psychosocial Stress and Sex Differences on Cognitive Effort Avoidance","authors":"Noa Givon","doi":"10.26443/msurj.v15i1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent research suggests stress may affect cognitive performance including memory, executive functioning, decision-making, and task-switching. However, it is unknown whether these effects are aversive or advantageous for effort exertion. This experiment aimed to evaluate the effects of acute psychosocial stress on willingness to exert cognitive control processes in a cognitive-effort-based decision-making task.Methods: To test this, 40 participants (20 female) in a within-subject, fully crossed, randomized design, were exposed to both a psychosocial stress induction condition (the Trier Social Stress Test; TSST) and a control condition. Subsequently, they underwent the Demand Selection Task (DST) that tests for participants’ effort aversion by manipulating switch probabilities in a task-switching paradigm. Results and Conclusion: The induction of stress did not lead to significant error or accuracy rates, or significant differences in cognitive effort avoidance. Previous research indicated sex differences in response to stress. However, there is a lack of data on sex differences in the avoidance of demanding cognitive processes. Therefore, we assessed sex differences in the DST and found that women were more likely to avoid cognitive effort, choosing the less cognitively demanding cue more often than men. Limitations: A limitation of this study is the small sample size. Future research should increase the sample size and take individual differences in stress responders, type of stressor, and biases on effort exertion into account.","PeriodicalId":91927,"journal":{"name":"McGill Science undergraduate research journal : MSURJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill Science undergraduate research journal : MSURJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26443/msurj.v15i1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent research suggests stress may affect cognitive performance including memory, executive functioning, decision-making, and task-switching. However, it is unknown whether these effects are aversive or advantageous for effort exertion. This experiment aimed to evaluate the effects of acute psychosocial stress on willingness to exert cognitive control processes in a cognitive-effort-based decision-making task.Methods: To test this, 40 participants (20 female) in a within-subject, fully crossed, randomized design, were exposed to both a psychosocial stress induction condition (the Trier Social Stress Test; TSST) and a control condition. Subsequently, they underwent the Demand Selection Task (DST) that tests for participants’ effort aversion by manipulating switch probabilities in a task-switching paradigm. Results and Conclusion: The induction of stress did not lead to significant error or accuracy rates, or significant differences in cognitive effort avoidance. Previous research indicated sex differences in response to stress. However, there is a lack of data on sex differences in the avoidance of demanding cognitive processes. Therefore, we assessed sex differences in the DST and found that women were more likely to avoid cognitive effort, choosing the less cognitively demanding cue more often than men. Limitations: A limitation of this study is the small sample size. Future research should increase the sample size and take individual differences in stress responders, type of stressor, and biases on effort exertion into account.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理社会压力和性别差异对认知努力回避的影响
背景:最近的研究表明,压力可能会影响认知表现,包括记忆、执行功能、决策和任务转换。然而,目前尚不清楚这些影响对努力是不利还是有利。本实验旨在评估急性心理社会压力对在基于认知努力的决策任务中实施认知控制过程的意愿的影响。方法:为了测试这一点,在受试者内部,完全交叉的随机设计中,40名参与者(20名女性)同时暴露于心理社会压力诱导条件(Trier社会压力测试;TSST)和对照条件下。随后,他们接受了需求选择任务(DST),该任务通过在任务切换范式中操纵切换概率来测试参与者的努力厌恶。结果和结论:压力的诱导没有导致显著的错误率或准确率,也没有导致认知努力回避的显著差异。先前的研究表明,对压力的反应存在性别差异。然而,在避免苛刻的认知过程方面,缺乏关于性别差异的数据。因此,我们评估了DST中的性别差异,发现女性更有可能避免认知努力,比男性更经常选择认知要求较低的线索。局限性:本研究的局限性在于样本量较小。未来的研究应该增加样本量,并考虑到压力反应者、压力源类型和对努力的偏见的个体差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Iron in Epidermal Healing and Infection At Once Friends and Foes Enduring Controversial Story in the Human Brain Rho GTPase regulatory proteins contribute to podocyte morphology and function Uncovering the Regulators of CRISPR-Cas Immunity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1