Ethics Position of Brazilian Workers: An International Comparative View

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Latin American Business Review Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.1080/10978526.2022.2053780
Pedro Delduque Kropf, O. Figueiredo
{"title":"Ethics Position of Brazilian Workers: An International Comparative View","authors":"Pedro Delduque Kropf, O. Figueiredo","doi":"10.1080/10978526.2022.2053780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article explores Brazilian workers’ ethics position and compares it to those of other nations. We surveyed 410 Brazilian workers and used the Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ), with idealism and relativism scales. We translated, back-translated, and adapted the scales according to Sperber and conducted exploratory factor analyses together with confirmatory factor analyses to validate them. The results show that Brazilians present, on average, high idealism and low relativism. Therefore, Brazil appears to be a well-defined “absolutist” country compared to other nations, a surprising outcome, since Brazil ranks as one of the most corrupt countries on international scales.","PeriodicalId":35384,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2022.2053780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article explores Brazilian workers’ ethics position and compares it to those of other nations. We surveyed 410 Brazilian workers and used the Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ), with idealism and relativism scales. We translated, back-translated, and adapted the scales according to Sperber and conducted exploratory factor analyses together with confirmatory factor analyses to validate them. The results show that Brazilians present, on average, high idealism and low relativism. Therefore, Brazil appears to be a well-defined “absolutist” country compared to other nations, a surprising outcome, since Brazil ranks as one of the most corrupt countries on international scales.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西工人的伦理地位:一个国际比较的观点
摘要本文探讨了巴西工人的道德地位,并与其他国家的工人道德地位进行了比较。我们调查了410名巴西工人,并使用道德立场问卷(EPQ),具有理想主义和相对主义量表。我们根据Sperber对量表进行了翻译、反翻译和改编,并进行了探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析来验证量表。结果显示,平均而言,巴西人的理想主义程度较高,相对主义程度较低。因此,与其他国家相比,巴西似乎是一个明确的“专制主义”国家,这是一个令人惊讶的结果,因为巴西在国际范围内被列为最腐败的国家之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Latin American Business Review
Latin American Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Latin American Business Review is a quarterly, refereed journal which facilitates the exchange of information and new ideas between academics, business practitioners, public policymakers, and those in the international development community. Special features of the journal will keep you current on various teaching, research, and information sources. These activities all focus on the business and economic environment of the diverse and dynamic countries of the Americas.
期刊最新文献
Liability of Foreignness in Metals and Mining Companies in Brazil Profiles of Value Chains and Innovative and Organizational Performance in Microenterprises in Southern Ecuador Measuring Solvency Risk Using Flexible Distributions: An Analysis for the Colombian Banking System Brazilian Fiscal Policy and Its Procyclical Nature: A Long-Term Analysis Recent Management Accounting Literature: Bibliometric Analysis and Contributions from Latin America
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1