Werden and Periphrases with Present Participles and Infinitives: A Diachronic Corpus Analysis

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Germanic Linguistics Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1017/S1470542721000064
Valentina Concu
{"title":"Werden and Periphrases with Present Participles and Infinitives: A Diachronic Corpus Analysis","authors":"Valentina Concu","doi":"10.1017/S1470542721000064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scholarship on the Modern German periphrastic future, or the werden future (that is, werden + infinitive) has brought forth different hypotheses about its origins. One of these hypotheses states that it developed from werden + present participle in the 13th century (for example, Bech 1901). While many have criticized this hypothesis, no one until now has proposed a valid solution for the problem. In this study, I carried out a comprehensive examination of the instances of werden in combination with present participles and infinitives in Middle and Early New High German. The analysis indicates that although werden + present participle and werden + infinitive were often used in similar contexts, the former construction was not the source from which the werden future emerged. Old High German data also show the use of werden + infinitive, which suggests that it was already well established in the first two centuries of the Middle High German period. This provides evidence against the view that the construction developed as late as the 13th century. I also address the grammaticalization process that werden + infinitive underwent during the Early New High German period and suggest that it culminated in the 16th century.","PeriodicalId":42927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Germanic Linguistics","volume":"34 1","pages":"1 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Germanic Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542721000064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scholarship on the Modern German periphrastic future, or the werden future (that is, werden + infinitive) has brought forth different hypotheses about its origins. One of these hypotheses states that it developed from werden + present participle in the 13th century (for example, Bech 1901). While many have criticized this hypothesis, no one until now has proposed a valid solution for the problem. In this study, I carried out a comprehensive examination of the instances of werden in combination with present participles and infinitives in Middle and Early New High German. The analysis indicates that although werden + present participle and werden + infinitive were often used in similar contexts, the former construction was not the source from which the werden future emerged. Old High German data also show the use of werden + infinitive, which suggests that it was already well established in the first two centuries of the Middle High German period. This provides evidence against the view that the construction developed as late as the 13th century. I also address the grammaticalization process that werden + infinitive underwent during the Early New High German period and suggest that it culminated in the 16th century.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Werden和带有现在分词和不定式的Periphrases:历时语料库分析
关于现代德语的迂回未来或werden未来(即werden +不定式)的学术研究对其起源提出了不同的假设。其中一种假设认为,它是在13世纪从werden +现在分词发展而来的(例如,Bech 1901)。尽管许多人批评了这一假设,但直到现在还没有人提出一个有效的解决方案。在这项研究中,我对中古和早期新高地德语中werden与现在分词和不定式结合的实例进行了全面的研究。分析表明,虽然werden +现在分词和werden +不定式在相似的语境中经常使用,但前者并不是werden将来时的来源。古高地德语的资料也显示了werden +不定式的使用,这表明它在中古高地德语时期的前两个世纪就已经确立了。这为反驳这种建筑发展到13世纪的观点提供了证据。我还讨论了werden +不定式在早期新高地德语时期所经历的语法化过程,并认为它在16世纪达到了顶峰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
The Phonology of Mid Vowels in Germanic Languages (Den) eneste måten – When the Prenominal Determiner Can Be Omitted from Norwegian Double Definite Phrases Processing Factors Constrain Word-Order Variation in German: The Trouble with Third Constructions What the Schwartzes Told Me about Allomorph Priority Pronominal Adverbs in German: A Grammaticalization Account
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1