Impacts of national intellectual capital on informal economy: the moderating role of institutional quality

IF 2.9 Q2 BUSINESS Competitiveness Review Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.1108/cr-03-2023-0047
Toan Khanh Tran Pham
{"title":"Impacts of national intellectual capital on informal economy: the moderating role of institutional quality","authors":"Toan Khanh Tran Pham","doi":"10.1108/cr-03-2023-0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe studies that explore the impacts of national intellectual capital on informal economy are scant. Moreover, the effect of an external factor such as institutional quality that moderates this relationship has largely been neglected in previous studies. Institutions are considered important pillars to accumulate national intellectual capital and reduce shadow economy. As such, this paper aims to investigate how institutional quality moderates the effects of national intellectual capital on informal economy in 17 Asian countries from 2000 to 2018.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper uses the generalized method of moments techniques, which allow cross-sectional dependence and slope homogeneity in panel data, to examine the moderating role of institutional quality on the relationship between national intellectual capital and informal economy. Various tests are conducted to ensure the robustness of the findings.\n\n\nFindings\nEmpirical findings from this paper indicate that an increase in national intellectual capital and institutional quality declines the informal economy. Interestingly, better institutional quality aggravates the negative effects of national intellectual capital on reducing the size of informal economy. The author also finds that enhancing international trade and economic growth results in a decrease in the informal economy in Asian countries.\n\n\nPractical implications\nEmpirical findings offer policymakers an indication of the relationships between national intellectual capital, institutional quality and informal economy, pointing out that national intellectual capital and institutional quality should be strengthened to allow Asian countries to limit the informal economy.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study provides a conceptual model through which the moderating role of institutional quality on the national intellectual capital–informal economy nexus can be recognized. This approach has thus far not been investigated in the existing literature. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study makes an original contribution to the empirical of national intellectual capital and informal economy nexus and produces new insights into the fields of the moderating effects of institutional quality on this nexus.\n","PeriodicalId":46521,"journal":{"name":"Competitiveness Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competitiveness Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-03-2023-0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose The studies that explore the impacts of national intellectual capital on informal economy are scant. Moreover, the effect of an external factor such as institutional quality that moderates this relationship has largely been neglected in previous studies. Institutions are considered important pillars to accumulate national intellectual capital and reduce shadow economy. As such, this paper aims to investigate how institutional quality moderates the effects of national intellectual capital on informal economy in 17 Asian countries from 2000 to 2018. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses the generalized method of moments techniques, which allow cross-sectional dependence and slope homogeneity in panel data, to examine the moderating role of institutional quality on the relationship between national intellectual capital and informal economy. Various tests are conducted to ensure the robustness of the findings. Findings Empirical findings from this paper indicate that an increase in national intellectual capital and institutional quality declines the informal economy. Interestingly, better institutional quality aggravates the negative effects of national intellectual capital on reducing the size of informal economy. The author also finds that enhancing international trade and economic growth results in a decrease in the informal economy in Asian countries. Practical implications Empirical findings offer policymakers an indication of the relationships between national intellectual capital, institutional quality and informal economy, pointing out that national intellectual capital and institutional quality should be strengthened to allow Asian countries to limit the informal economy. Originality/value This study provides a conceptual model through which the moderating role of institutional quality on the national intellectual capital–informal economy nexus can be recognized. This approach has thus far not been investigated in the existing literature. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study makes an original contribution to the empirical of national intellectual capital and informal economy nexus and produces new insights into the fields of the moderating effects of institutional quality on this nexus.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家智力资本对非正规经济的影响:制度质量的调节作用
目的探讨国家智力资本对非正规经济影响的研究很少。此外,在以前的研究中,调节这种关系的外部因素(如制度质量)的影响在很大程度上被忽视了。制度被认为是积累国家智力资本和减少影子经济的重要支柱。因此,本文旨在研究2000年至2018年17个亚洲国家的制度质量如何调节国家知识资本对非正规经济的影响。设计/方法/方法本文使用矩量技术的广义方法,该方法允许面板数据中的横截面依赖性和斜率同质性,考察制度质量对国家知识资本与非正规经济关系的调节作用。进行了各种测试以确保调查结果的稳健性。研究结果本文的实证结果表明,国家智力资本和制度质量的提高会使非正规经济衰退。有趣的是,更好的制度质量加剧了国家知识资本对缩小非正规经济规模的负面影响。作者还发现,加强国际贸易和经济增长会导致亚洲国家非正规经济的减少。实证研究结果为政策制定者提供了国家知识资本、制度质量和非正规经济之间关系的指示,指出应加强国家知识资本和制度质量,使亚洲国家能够限制非正规经济。原创性/价值本研究提供了一个概念模型,通过该模型可以认识到制度质量对国家知识资本-非正规经济关系的调节作用。到目前为止,现有文献中还没有对这种方法进行过研究。据作者所知,本研究对国家知识资本与非正规经济关系的实证研究做出了独创性贡献,并对制度质量对这一关系的调节作用产生了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The following list indicates the key issues in the Competitiveness Review. We invite papers on these and related topics. Special issues of the Review will collect papers on specific topics selected by the editors. Definition/conceptual framework of competitiveness Competitiveness diagnostics and rankings Competitiveness and economic outcomes Specific dimensions of competitiveness Competitiveness and endowments Competitiveness and economic development Location and business strategy International business and the role of MNCs Innovation and innovative capacity Clusters and cluster initiatives Institutions for competitiveness Public policy (e.g., innovation, cluster development, regional development) The Competitiveness Review aims to publish high quality papers directed at scholars, government institutions, businesses and practitioners. It appears in collaboration with key academic and professional groups in the field of competitiveness analysis and policy, including the Microeconomics of Competitiveness (MOC) network and The Competitiveness Institute (TCI) practitioner network for competitiveness, clusters and innovation.
期刊最新文献
A TOPSIS analysis of regional competitiveness at European level Evaluating Uganda’s preferential market access; trade intensity, comparative advantage and the potential for trade Nexus between corporate governance and FinTech disclosure: a comparative study between conventional and Islamic banks Mapping the intellectual landscape of financial inclusion and sustainable development: a bibliometric analysis Comparative computer simulation and empirical analysis of MIDAS and artificial neural network-UMIDAS models for short- and long-term US GDP forecasting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1