Access to Justice: New Right or a Reaffirmation of Existing Human Rights for Persons with Disabilities?

Melaku T Zengeta
{"title":"Access to Justice: New Right or a Reaffirmation of Existing Human Rights for Persons with Disabilities?","authors":"Melaku T Zengeta","doi":"10.20961/yustisia.v11i3.68402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Convention for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), as a specific human rights instrument, seems to create a new disability-specific right to access justice under Article 13. This study analyzed the place of specific rights for people with disability to access justice in the CRPD. This study concludes that Article 13 of the CRPD has expanded the traditional conceptions of access to justice since it also covers effective remedy and fair hearing. Several inherent limitations, or impairments, which interact with multidimensional and inherent barriers, have prevented persons with disabilities from accessing justice based on equality. The article has shown that the new set of rights is a guarantee of justice. ","PeriodicalId":33244,"journal":{"name":"Yustisia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yustisia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v11i3.68402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Convention for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), as a specific human rights instrument, seems to create a new disability-specific right to access justice under Article 13. This study analyzed the place of specific rights for people with disability to access justice in the CRPD. This study concludes that Article 13 of the CRPD has expanded the traditional conceptions of access to justice since it also covers effective remedy and fair hearing. Several inherent limitations, or impairments, which interact with multidimensional and inherent barriers, have prevented persons with disabilities from accessing justice based on equality. The article has shown that the new set of rights is a guarantee of justice. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诉诸司法:残疾人的新权利还是对现有人权的重申?
《残疾人权利公约》作为一项具体的人权文书,似乎根据第13条确立了一项新的针对残疾人的诉诸司法的权利。本研究分析了残疾人获得司法救助的具体权利在《残疾人权利公约》中的地位。本研究的结论是,《残疾人权利公约》第13条扩大了诉诸司法的传统概念,因为它也涵盖了有效补救和公平听证。一些固有的限制或障碍与多层面和固有的障碍相互作用,阻碍了残疾人在平等的基础上诉诸司法。这篇文章表明,新的一套权利是正义的保障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Postponed Regional Head Elections in Emergency Situations: a Constitutional Democracy Perspective in Indonesia Eliminating the Gap of Labor and Social Protection for the Workers of Platform-Based Transportation A Circular Economy-Based Plastic Waste Management Policy in Indonesia (Compared to China and EU) Enhancing Consumer Protection in the Indonesian Financial Service Sector through the Utilization of Standardized Contracts Inadequate Cryptocurrency and Money Laundering Regulations in Indonesia (Comparative Law of US and Germany)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1