{"title":"The Effect of Export on R&D Cost Behavior: Evidence from Korea","authors":"C. Ko, Hoon Jung","doi":"10.35611/jkt.2022.26.5.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - This research intends to find out whether R&D cost stickiness shows differentiated aspects depending on exports in Korea. A cost behavior that indicates a lower rate of costs decrease when sales decrease than the rate of costs increase when sales increase is called cost stickiness. This sticky cost behavior is caused by considering the adjusting costs. This study aims to empirically verify that R&D cost stickiness is greater in export firms than in non-export firms. We also investigate the effect of exports on R&D cost stickiness is nonlinear. \nDesign/methodology - We obtain data for the analysis from Kis-Value and TS2000 from 2012 to 2020. This study tests for R&D cost stickiness of exports using the cost stickiness model developed by Anderson et al. (2003) that is used in a lot of prior literature. To explore the nonlinear behavior of R&D cost stickiness we include a quadratic term of exports in our model. \nFindings - The results of our analysis are as follows. First, we observed that R&D costs of export firms are more sticky than that of non-export firms. Our result indicated that export firms are less likely to reduce R&D costs in decreasing sales periods in preparation for future sales recovery. Second, our empirical evidence shows that export firms view R&D costs much favorably. However, we hypothesize that the effect of export intensity on R&D costs may not necessarily be linear. Our result shows the effect of exports intensity on R&D stickiness is thus nonlinear, forming a reverse U-shaped curve. When export intensity exceeds a certain threshold, the growth rate of R&D costs appears to be viewed negatively. Firms with relatively high export intensity do not support R&D costs, viewing them as taking away firms’ resources from other more productive costs. On the contrary, those with export intensity under the threshold view R&D costs as beneficial and therefore promote further R&D costs when revenue decreases. \nOriginality/value - The results of this research can contribute academically to the expansion of empirical research on R&D cost stickiness. R&D cost stickiness varies by industry. As a result of our research, the managers of export firms recognize the importance of R&D to lead innovation. We expected that this research contributes to further studies on R&D costs and cost stickiness. Second, this research has implications from a business perspectives. Our findings of export firms’ R&D stickiness suggest that export firms’ managers should consider keeping the stickiness of R&D when revenue decreases because it is essential for exporting firms to maintain their R&D stickiness to secure longterm competitiveness. R&D stickiness can be used on a practical basis to emphasize the need for continuous investment in exporting firms’ R&D activities.","PeriodicalId":37797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korea Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korea Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35611/jkt.2022.26.5.23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose - This research intends to find out whether R&D cost stickiness shows differentiated aspects depending on exports in Korea. A cost behavior that indicates a lower rate of costs decrease when sales decrease than the rate of costs increase when sales increase is called cost stickiness. This sticky cost behavior is caused by considering the adjusting costs. This study aims to empirically verify that R&D cost stickiness is greater in export firms than in non-export firms. We also investigate the effect of exports on R&D cost stickiness is nonlinear.
Design/methodology - We obtain data for the analysis from Kis-Value and TS2000 from 2012 to 2020. This study tests for R&D cost stickiness of exports using the cost stickiness model developed by Anderson et al. (2003) that is used in a lot of prior literature. To explore the nonlinear behavior of R&D cost stickiness we include a quadratic term of exports in our model.
Findings - The results of our analysis are as follows. First, we observed that R&D costs of export firms are more sticky than that of non-export firms. Our result indicated that export firms are less likely to reduce R&D costs in decreasing sales periods in preparation for future sales recovery. Second, our empirical evidence shows that export firms view R&D costs much favorably. However, we hypothesize that the effect of export intensity on R&D costs may not necessarily be linear. Our result shows the effect of exports intensity on R&D stickiness is thus nonlinear, forming a reverse U-shaped curve. When export intensity exceeds a certain threshold, the growth rate of R&D costs appears to be viewed negatively. Firms with relatively high export intensity do not support R&D costs, viewing them as taking away firms’ resources from other more productive costs. On the contrary, those with export intensity under the threshold view R&D costs as beneficial and therefore promote further R&D costs when revenue decreases.
Originality/value - The results of this research can contribute academically to the expansion of empirical research on R&D cost stickiness. R&D cost stickiness varies by industry. As a result of our research, the managers of export firms recognize the importance of R&D to lead innovation. We expected that this research contributes to further studies on R&D costs and cost stickiness. Second, this research has implications from a business perspectives. Our findings of export firms’ R&D stickiness suggest that export firms’ managers should consider keeping the stickiness of R&D when revenue decreases because it is essential for exporting firms to maintain their R&D stickiness to secure longterm competitiveness. R&D stickiness can be used on a practical basis to emphasize the need for continuous investment in exporting firms’ R&D activities.
▽研究目的=本研究的目的是了解韩国的R&D费用粘性是否因出口的不同而呈现出不同的特征。当销售下降时成本下降的速度低于销售增加时成本增加的速度,这种成本行为被称为成本粘性。这种粘性成本行为是由于考虑了调整成本而产生的。本研究旨在实证验证出口企业的研发成本粘性大于非出口企业。我们还研究了出口对研发成本粘性的影响是非线性的。设计/方法-我们从2012年至2020年从kiss - value和TS2000中获取数据进行分析。本研究使用Anderson et al.(2003)开发的成本粘性模型对出口产品的研发成本粘性进行检验,该模型在之前的许多文献中都有使用。为了探讨研发成本粘性的非线性行为,我们在模型中加入了出口的二次项。调查结果-我们的分析结果如下。首先,我们观察到出口企业的研发成本比非出口企业更具粘性。我们的研究结果表明,出口企业在减少销售周期以准备未来销售复苏时,降低研发成本的可能性较小。第二,我们的实证证据表明,出口企业对研发成本的看法更为有利。然而,我们假设出口强度对研发成本的影响不一定是线性的。研究结果表明,出口强度对研发粘性的影响是非线性的,呈倒u型曲线。当出口强度超过一定阈值时,研发成本的增长率呈现负值。出口强度相对较高的企业不支持研发成本,认为研发成本从其他生产成本中夺走了企业的资源。相反,出口强度低于阈值的企业认为研发成本是有利的,因此在收入下降时,会推动进一步的研发成本。原创性/价值——本研究的结果可以为拓展研发成本粘性的实证研究做出学术贡献。研发成本粘性因行业而异。我们的研究结果表明,出口企业的管理者认识到研发对引领创新的重要性。期望本研究能为研发成本与成本粘性的进一步研究做出贡献。其次,本研究具有商业意义。对出口企业研发粘性的研究结果表明,当出口企业收入下降时,出口企业管理者应考虑保持研发粘性,因为保持研发粘性对出口企业获得长期竞争力至关重要。研发粘性可以在实践基础上用于强调出口企业研发活动持续投资的必要性。
Journal of Korea TradeEconomics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
Journal of Korea Trade purports to support and encourage researches in the area of international economics, international business and foreign trade practices & laws. The Journal welcomes theoretical and empirical papers in the broadly-defined international trade issues and policy implications in the context of Korea Trade.