The effect of APRV-LTV mechanical ventilation mode on SpO2 and ventilation indices in patients with COVID-19

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Nursing Practice Today Pub Date : 2023-06-03 DOI:10.18502/npt.v10i2.12831
Atye Babaii, M. Abbasinia, A. Ahmadi, S. Adeli, Seyed Yaser Foroghi ghomi, Samaneh Pakzaban
{"title":"The effect of APRV-LTV mechanical ventilation mode on SpO2 and ventilation indices in patients with COVID-19","authors":"Atye Babaii, M. Abbasinia, A. Ahmadi, S. Adeli, Seyed Yaser Foroghi ghomi, Samaneh Pakzaban","doi":"10.18502/npt.v10i2.12831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aim: Mechanical ventilation is a life-saving method for acute respiratory distress syndrome. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of airway pressure release ventilation-low tidal volume mode on COVID-19 patients’ peripheral capillary oxygen saturation and ventilation indices. \nMethods & Materials: This clinical trial was conducted on 70 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the Intensive care unit in Qom, Iran. Patients were selected using convenience sampling and randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. In the control group, patients were ventilated using synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation mode, and in the intervention group, patients were ventilated using airway pressure release ventilation-low tidal volume mode. Patients’ peripheral capillary oxygen saturation and ventilation indices were checked and recorded before and after the intervention. The data were analyzed using SPSS 11.5. \nResults: According to the results of the repeated-measures ANOVA test before the intervention and the 2 and 4 hours after the intervention, there were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups regarding the fraction of inspired oxygen, volume minute per minute, and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (P>0.05). However, in the intervention group compared to the control group, the mean of PIP was significantly reduced (P<0.05). \nConclusion: In patients with COVID-19, the two modes of mechanical ventilation, APRV, and control, had no significant differences in the fraction of inspired oxygen, volume minute per minute, and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation. However, the mean peak inspiratory pressure reduction in the intervention group was greater than that in the control group. Considering that several factors can affect peripheral capillary oxygen saturation and ventilation indices, these results should be considered with caution.","PeriodicalId":36883,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Practice Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Practice Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/npt.v10i2.12831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aim: Mechanical ventilation is a life-saving method for acute respiratory distress syndrome. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of airway pressure release ventilation-low tidal volume mode on COVID-19 patients’ peripheral capillary oxygen saturation and ventilation indices. Methods & Materials: This clinical trial was conducted on 70 COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the Intensive care unit in Qom, Iran. Patients were selected using convenience sampling and randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. In the control group, patients were ventilated using synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation mode, and in the intervention group, patients were ventilated using airway pressure release ventilation-low tidal volume mode. Patients’ peripheral capillary oxygen saturation and ventilation indices were checked and recorded before and after the intervention. The data were analyzed using SPSS 11.5. Results: According to the results of the repeated-measures ANOVA test before the intervention and the 2 and 4 hours after the intervention, there were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups regarding the fraction of inspired oxygen, volume minute per minute, and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (P>0.05). However, in the intervention group compared to the control group, the mean of PIP was significantly reduced (P<0.05). Conclusion: In patients with COVID-19, the two modes of mechanical ventilation, APRV, and control, had no significant differences in the fraction of inspired oxygen, volume minute per minute, and peripheral capillary oxygen saturation. However, the mean peak inspiratory pressure reduction in the intervention group was greater than that in the control group. Considering that several factors can affect peripheral capillary oxygen saturation and ventilation indices, these results should be considered with caution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
APRV-LTV机械通气模式对COVID-19患者SpO2及通气指标的影响
背景与目的:机械通气是治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征的一种挽救生命的方法。本研究旨在探讨气道压力释放通气-低潮气量通气模式对新冠肺炎患者外周毛细血管血氧饱和度和通气指标的影响。方法与材料:本临床试验对70名在伊朗库姆重症监护室住院的新冠肺炎患者进行。患者采用方便抽样法进行选择,并随机分为干预组和对照组。对照组患者采用同步间歇强制通气模式通气,干预组患者采用气道压力释放通气低潮气量模式通气。在干预前后检查并记录患者的外周毛细血管血氧饱和度和通气指数。使用SPSS 11.5对数据进行分析。结果:根据干预前和干预后2、4小时的重复测量方差分析结果,干预组与对照组在吸氧分数、每分钟体积分钟数和外周毛细血管血氧饱和度方面无显著差异(P>0.05),与对照组相比,干预组PIP平均值显著降低(P<0.05)。结论:新冠肺炎患者APRV和对照组两种机械通气方式的吸氧量、每分钟容量和外周毛细血管血氧饱和度无显著差异。然而,干预组的平均峰值吸气压力下降大于对照组。考虑到几个因素会影响外周毛细血管血氧饱和度和通气指标,应谨慎考虑这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Practice Today
Nursing Practice Today Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Functional capacity and its associated factors in older adults in the rural area in Brazil Predictors of prone position use in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study Fear of COVID-19, stress, anxiety, depression, and insomnia among undergraduate nursing students in Oman The level of teamwork and associated factors in the selected hospitals from the nurses' perspective: A cross-sectional study A thematic analysis of professionalism from the perspective of nurse managers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1