On Diairesis, Parallel Division, and Chiasmus: Plato’s and Aristotle’s Methods of Division

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Plato Journal Pub Date : 2021-10-25 DOI:10.14195/2183-4105_22_3
Xin Liu
{"title":"On Diairesis, Parallel Division, and Chiasmus: Plato’s and Aristotle’s Methods of Division","authors":"Xin Liu","doi":"10.14195/2183-4105_22_3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I articulate three kinds of division that Plato and Aristotle acknowledge to be proper, valid methods of division, namely, diairesis (vertical division), parallel division, and chiasmus (cross-division). I attempt to explain the relationship among the three kinds of division, namely, how they transform from one to another. Starting with Plato’s division of constitution in the Statesman, I illuminate that from ostensible diairesis emerges a parallel division, and the parallel division causes a cross-division to occur. Thus, the sixfold division of constitution is not a diairesis (as it appears to be) but rather is a 3 x 2 cross-division. Inheriting the three kinds of division from Plato, Aristotle advances the form by providing a theoretical explanation to the transformation of the three kinds of division. In Topics Z6, Aristotle prescribes two conditions under which a parallel division can originate from or construct ostensible diairesis and how the parallel division further causes a cross-division to occur.","PeriodicalId":53756,"journal":{"name":"Plato Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plato Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_22_3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, I articulate three kinds of division that Plato and Aristotle acknowledge to be proper, valid methods of division, namely, diairesis (vertical division), parallel division, and chiasmus (cross-division). I attempt to explain the relationship among the three kinds of division, namely, how they transform from one to another. Starting with Plato’s division of constitution in the Statesman, I illuminate that from ostensible diairesis emerges a parallel division, and the parallel division causes a cross-division to occur. Thus, the sixfold division of constitution is not a diairesis (as it appears to be) but rather is a 3 x 2 cross-division. Inheriting the three kinds of division from Plato, Aristotle advances the form by providing a theoretical explanation to the transformation of the three kinds of division. In Topics Z6, Aristotle prescribes two conditions under which a parallel division can originate from or construct ostensible diairesis and how the parallel division further causes a cross-division to occur.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论Diairesis, Parallel Division和Chiasmus:柏拉图和亚里士多德的分裂方法
在这篇文章中,我阐述了柏拉图和亚里士多德承认的三种正确有效的划分方法,即diairesis(垂直划分)、平行划分和chiasmus(交叉划分)。我试图解释这三种划分之间的关系,即它们如何从一种划分转变为另一种划分。从柏拉图在《政治家》中对宪法的划分开始,我阐明了从表面上的划分产生了平行的划分,而平行的划分导致了交叉的划分。因此,宪法的六重划分并不是一个二重划分(看起来是这样),而是一个3×2的交叉划分。亚里士多德继承了柏拉图的三种划分,通过对三种划分的转换提供理论解释,提出了这一形式。在主题Z6中,亚里士多德规定了两个条件,在这两个条件下,平行划分可以起源于或构建表面上的分裂,以及平行划分如何进一步导致交叉划分的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plato Journal
Plato Journal PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
J. K. Larsen, V. V. Haraldsen, and J. Vlasits (eds.), New Perspectives on Platonic Dialectic. A Philosophy of Inquiry, New York - London, Routledge 2022 Choosing and Desire in Plato's Republic 4 Myth, virtue and method in Plato’s Meno Mason Marshall, Reading Plato’s Dialogues to Enhance Learning and Inquiry: Exploring Socrates’ Use of Protreptic for Student Engagement. New York: Routledge F. Benoni; A. Stavru (eds.) (2021). Platone e il governo delle passioni. Studi per Linda Napolitano. Perugia, Aguaplano
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1