Effect of horizontal slot of maxillary canines’ brackets with varying wire angulations - An in vitro study

Q2 Medicine Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202205104
Márcio Crestana Cantarelli, Ana Paula Terossi de Godoi, M. Sinhoreti, J. Neves, E. A. Santos, L. Correr-Sobrinho, A. R. Costa
{"title":"Effect of horizontal slot of maxillary canines’ brackets with varying wire angulations - An in vitro study","authors":"Márcio Crestana Cantarelli, Ana Paula Terossi de Godoi, M. Sinhoreti, J. Neves, E. A. Santos, L. Correr-Sobrinho, A. R. Costa","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202205104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A new device was developed to enable the visualization and measurement of canine angulation while at the same time visualizing and measuring the force transmitted to adjacent teeth. This study aimed to evaluate the mesiodistal tilt angle of the upper canine brackets, the wire deflection, and its effects on adjacent teeth with five different slot designs of upper canines. Wires (0.020” and 0.019” x 0.025”) were tested on different five bracket types at five different distal angles. The force applied to adjacent teeth was measured as the angle was increased, and its consequences were observed in the posterior and anterior regions as well. The force tension (gf) was measured in a universal testing machine. Data were submitted to a 3-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). For both arches, regardless of the type of tooth and bracket type, the highest means tension mean values were shown by the 20° angle, followed by the 15°,10°, and 5° angles, which differed statistically among themselves. Overall, for 5°, 10°, and 15° angles, conventional and versatile brackets showed significantly higher force values in all teeth, tip-edge and control brackets showed the lowest. The highest force values were observed in central and lateral incisors with conventional and versatile brackets and on first and second premolar teeth with self-ligating passive and control brackets. Conventional brackets presented the highest forces, tip-edge and control brackets showed the lowest. The teeth that suffered the greatest forces were lateral incisors, and those that suffered the least were second premolars.","PeriodicalId":9211,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"33 1","pages":"55 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202205104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract A new device was developed to enable the visualization and measurement of canine angulation while at the same time visualizing and measuring the force transmitted to adjacent teeth. This study aimed to evaluate the mesiodistal tilt angle of the upper canine brackets, the wire deflection, and its effects on adjacent teeth with five different slot designs of upper canines. Wires (0.020” and 0.019” x 0.025”) were tested on different five bracket types at five different distal angles. The force applied to adjacent teeth was measured as the angle was increased, and its consequences were observed in the posterior and anterior regions as well. The force tension (gf) was measured in a universal testing machine. Data were submitted to a 3-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). For both arches, regardless of the type of tooth and bracket type, the highest means tension mean values were shown by the 20° angle, followed by the 15°,10°, and 5° angles, which differed statistically among themselves. Overall, for 5°, 10°, and 15° angles, conventional and versatile brackets showed significantly higher force values in all teeth, tip-edge and control brackets showed the lowest. The highest force values were observed in central and lateral incisors with conventional and versatile brackets and on first and second premolar teeth with self-ligating passive and control brackets. Conventional brackets presented the highest forces, tip-edge and control brackets showed the lowest. The teeth that suffered the greatest forces were lateral incisors, and those that suffered the least were second premolars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同金属丝角度对上颌犬托槽水平槽位影响的体外研究
摘要:研制了一种新型装置,可实现犬牙成角的可视化测量,同时也能显示和测量传递给相邻牙齿的力。本研究旨在评估五种不同上犬牙槽设计的上犬牙托槽的中远端倾斜角度、金属丝偏转及其对邻牙的影响。钢丝(0.020”和0.019”x 0.025”)在不同的五种托架类型上以五个不同的远端角度进行测试。随着角度的增加,施加在相邻牙齿上的力被测量出来,其结果也被观察到在后牙和前牙区域。在万能试验机上测量了力张力(gf)。数据采用3-way方差分析和Tukey检验(α=0.05)。两种牙槽的平均张力平均值均以20°角最高,其次为15°角、10°角和5°角,两者之间存在统计学差异。总的来说,对于5°、10°和15°的角度,常规托槽和通用托槽在所有牙齿上的受力值都明显更高,尖端托槽和控制托槽的受力值最低。常规托槽和多功能托槽在中门牙和侧门牙上的力值最高,自结扎被动托槽和控制托槽在第一和第二前磨牙上的力值最高。常规托架受力最大,尖端托架和控制托架受力最小。受外力最大的牙齿是侧门牙,而受外力最小的是第二前磨牙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian dental journal
Brazilian dental journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Dental Journal, publishes Full-Length Papers, Short Communications and Case Reports, dealing with dentistry or related disciplines and edited six times a year.
期刊最新文献
Can a dentin bonding agent prevent color change in regenerative endodontic procedures? An in vitro evaluation Antibacterial ability of different activated irrigation after root canal preparation: intratubular analyses Inhibition of incipient caries lesion progression by different fluoridated varnishes A new hydroxyapatite-alginate-gelatin biocomposite favor bone regeneration in a critical-sized calvarial defect model Prevalence of lectures about dental esthetics and female speakers in three Brazilian conferences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1