Validation of the Turkish version of the self-evaluation of negative symptoms scale (SNS)

I. Polat, Ezgi Ince Guliyev, Sibel Elmas, Sufiya Karakaş, Ö. Aydemir, A. Üçok
{"title":"Validation of the Turkish version of the self-evaluation of negative symptoms scale (SNS)","authors":"I. Polat, Ezgi Ince Guliyev, Sibel Elmas, Sufiya Karakaş, Ö. Aydemir, A. Üçok","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2022.2082985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms Scale (SNS) is a self-report scale that evaluates a patient’s subjective experience on all five domains of the negative symptoms. This study aimed to present the adaptation and validation study of the Turkish version of SNS(SNS-TR). Methods Seventy-five patients and 50 controls were recruited for this study. After the approval of the translation, participants were asked to fill out SNS-TR by themselves. They were interviewed with the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale (BNSS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS). Results SNS-TR showed good internal consistency in the reliability analysis with Cronbach’s alpha= 0.873. Subscale-total score correlation coefficients were significant (p < 0.01). In the validity analyses, the total and subscale scores of SNS-TR showed positive correlations with the total and subscales of BNSS, with only one exception of BNSS lack of distress subscales. The total score of SNS-TR demonstrated a significant correlation with PANSS-total, PANSS-negative subscale, PANSS-general subscale, and CDSS scores. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable values for the five-factor structure, similar to the original version. Conclusion To conclude, our study indicates that SNS-TR is an easily applicable self-evaluation tool with good psychometric properties for assessing negative symptoms. KEY POINTS SNS is a novel and easily applicable self-report scale for examining negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients, allowing them to evaluate their subjective experience on all five domains of the negative symptoms. It shows good internal consistency (α= 0.873) which is similar to the original version (α = 0.867). Confirmatory factor analysis scores were found in acceptable ranges and SNS-TR confirm the five-factor structure. Using this scale in clinical practice would empower both the physician’s examinations and patient participation through treatment and follow-up course.","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"221 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2022.2082985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms Scale (SNS) is a self-report scale that evaluates a patient’s subjective experience on all five domains of the negative symptoms. This study aimed to present the adaptation and validation study of the Turkish version of SNS(SNS-TR). Methods Seventy-five patients and 50 controls were recruited for this study. After the approval of the translation, participants were asked to fill out SNS-TR by themselves. They were interviewed with the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale (BNSS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS). Results SNS-TR showed good internal consistency in the reliability analysis with Cronbach’s alpha= 0.873. Subscale-total score correlation coefficients were significant (p < 0.01). In the validity analyses, the total and subscale scores of SNS-TR showed positive correlations with the total and subscales of BNSS, with only one exception of BNSS lack of distress subscales. The total score of SNS-TR demonstrated a significant correlation with PANSS-total, PANSS-negative subscale, PANSS-general subscale, and CDSS scores. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable values for the five-factor structure, similar to the original version. Conclusion To conclude, our study indicates that SNS-TR is an easily applicable self-evaluation tool with good psychometric properties for assessing negative symptoms. KEY POINTS SNS is a novel and easily applicable self-report scale for examining negative symptoms in schizophrenia patients, allowing them to evaluate their subjective experience on all five domains of the negative symptoms. It shows good internal consistency (α= 0.873) which is similar to the original version (α = 0.867). Confirmatory factor analysis scores were found in acceptable ranges and SNS-TR confirm the five-factor structure. Using this scale in clinical practice would empower both the physician’s examinations and patient participation through treatment and follow-up course.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土耳其版阴性症状自评量表(SNS)的验证
摘要目的阴性症状自评量表(SNS)是一种自我报告量表,用于评估患者在阴性症状的所有五个领域的主观体验。本研究旨在介绍土耳其版SNS(SNS-TR)的适应和验证研究。方法本研究共招募75名患者和50名对照者。翻译批准后,参与者被要求自己填写SNS-TR。他们接受了简短阴性症状量表(BNSS)、阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)和卡尔加里精神分裂症抑郁量表(CDSS)的访谈。结果SNS-TR在信度分析中表现出良好的内部一致性,Cronbachα=0.873。亚量表总分相关系数显著(p < 在有效性分析中,SNS-TR的总分和分量表得分与BNSS的总分和量表呈正相关,只有一个例外,即BNSS缺乏痛苦分量表。SNS-TR的总分与PANSS总分、PANSS阴性分量表、PANSS一般分量表和CDSS得分显著相关。验证性因子分析显示五因子结构的可接受值与原始版本相似。结论总之,我们的研究表明,SNS-TR是一种易于应用的自我评估工具,具有良好的心理测量特性,可用于评估阴性症状。关键点SNS是一种新颖且易于应用的自我报告量表,用于检查精神分裂症患者的阴性症状,使他们能够评估他们在阴性症状的所有五个领域的主观体验。它显示出良好的内部一致性(α=0.873),与原始版本(α = 0.867)。证实性因素分析得分在可接受范围内,SNS-TR证实了五因素结构。在临床实践中使用该量表将使医生的检查和患者在治疗和随访过程中的参与成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
期刊最新文献
Investigating psychiatric morbidity, hopelessness and suicide risk in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a case-control study. The complex clinical and cognitive phenotype of adult patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid hoarding disorder. Lipid variability in drug-naïve individuals affected with Major Depressive Disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Borderline personality disorder is an innate empathy anomaly: a scoping and narrative review. Relationship between coping strategies and change in symptom severity in contamination-focused OCD patients during the COVID-19: a one-year follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1