Morphological and molecular study of the genus Nosopsyllus (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae). Nosopsyllus barbarus () as a junior synonym of Nosopsyllus fasciatus (Bosc d’Antic, 1800)

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY Insect Systematics & Evolution Pub Date : 2018-11-14 DOI:10.1163/1876312X-00002164
A. Zurita, R. Callejón, M. Rojas, C. Cutillas
{"title":"Morphological and molecular study of the genus Nosopsyllus (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae). Nosopsyllus barbarus () as a junior synonym of Nosopsyllus fasciatus (Bosc d’Antic, 1800)","authors":"A. Zurita, R. Callejón, M. Rojas, C. Cutillas","doi":"10.1163/1876312X-00002164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present work, a comparative morphological and molecular study of Nosopsyllus barbarus (Jordan & Rothschild 1912) and Nosopsyllus fasciatus (Bosc, d’Antic 1800) isolated from rodents from different geographical regions (Spain, Morocco, Belgium, France and Portugal) has been carried out. The Internal Transcribed Spacers 1 and 2 (ITS1, ITS2) and partial 18S rRNA, and partial cytochrome c oxidase 1 ( cox1 ) and cytochrome b ( cytb ) mtDNA sequences were determined to clarify the taxonomic status of these two species and to assess intraspecific variation and inter-specific sequence differences. In addition, a phylogenetic analysis with other species of fleas using Bayesian inference was performed. We have found morphological differences between N. barbarus and N. fasciatus that did not correspond with molecular differences. Furthermore, any of the five molecular markers used in this study was able to discriminate between the two species. Thus, based on the phylogenetic and molecular study of three nuclear markers (18S, ITS1, ITS2) and two mitochondrial markers ( cox1 and cytb ), as well as the concatenated dataset of both species, we concluded that morphological characters traditionally used to discriminate between the two species do not provide solid arguments for considering these two “morphospecies” as two different species. Therefore, we propose N. barbarus should be considered as a junior synonym of N. fasciatus .","PeriodicalId":54975,"journal":{"name":"Insect Systematics & Evolution","volume":"49 1","pages":"81-101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/1876312X-00002164","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insect Systematics & Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1876312X-00002164","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In the present work, a comparative morphological and molecular study of Nosopsyllus barbarus (Jordan & Rothschild 1912) and Nosopsyllus fasciatus (Bosc, d’Antic 1800) isolated from rodents from different geographical regions (Spain, Morocco, Belgium, France and Portugal) has been carried out. The Internal Transcribed Spacers 1 and 2 (ITS1, ITS2) and partial 18S rRNA, and partial cytochrome c oxidase 1 ( cox1 ) and cytochrome b ( cytb ) mtDNA sequences were determined to clarify the taxonomic status of these two species and to assess intraspecific variation and inter-specific sequence differences. In addition, a phylogenetic analysis with other species of fleas using Bayesian inference was performed. We have found morphological differences between N. barbarus and N. fasciatus that did not correspond with molecular differences. Furthermore, any of the five molecular markers used in this study was able to discriminate between the two species. Thus, based on the phylogenetic and molecular study of three nuclear markers (18S, ITS1, ITS2) and two mitochondrial markers ( cox1 and cytb ), as well as the concatenated dataset of both species, we concluded that morphological characters traditionally used to discriminate between the two species do not provide solid arguments for considering these two “morphospecies” as two different species. Therefore, we propose N. barbarus should be considered as a junior synonym of N. fasciatus .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nosophyllus属的形态学和分子生物学研究(Siphonaptera:金鱼藻科)。barbarus Nosophyllus()是筋膜Nosophyllos的初级同义词(Bosc d‘Antic,1800)
在目前的工作中,对从不同地理区域(西班牙、摩洛哥、比利时、法国和葡萄牙)分离的nosopsylus barbarus (Jordan & Rothschild 1912)和nosopsylus fasciatus (Bosc, d 'Antic 1800)进行了形态学和分子比较研究。为了明确这两个物种的分类地位,并评估种内变异和种间序列差异,我们测定了内部转录间隔器1和2 (ITS1、ITS2)和部分18S rRNA,以及部分细胞色素c氧化酶1 (cox1)和细胞色素b (cytb) mtDNA序列。此外,利用贝叶斯推理与其他种类的跳蚤进行了系统发育分析。我们已经发现,在形态上的差异与分子上的差异是不一致的。此外,本研究中使用的五种分子标记中的任何一种都能够区分这两个物种。因此,基于三个核标记(18S, ITS1, ITS2)和两个线粒体标记(cox1和cytb)的系统发育和分子研究,以及两个物种的连接数据,我们得出结论,传统上用于区分两个物种的形态学特征不能为将这两个“形态物种”视为两个不同的物种提供坚实的论据。因此,我们建议将其视为筋膜棘豆的低级同义种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insect Systematics & Evolution
Insect Systematics & Evolution 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Insect Systematics & Evolution (ISE) publishes original papers on all aspects of systematic entomology and the evolutionary history of both extant and extinct insects and related groups. Priority is given to taxonomic revisions and phylogenetic studies employing morphological and molecular data. ISE also welcomes reviews and syntheses that can appeal to a wide community of systematic entomologists. Single species descriptions, regional checklists, and phylogenetic studies based on few taxa or single molecular markers will generally not be accepted.
期刊最新文献
The Relationship between Household SNAP Participation, Parent Feeding Styles, and Child Eating Behaviors. Proceedings from the Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists Annual Conference May 11-13, 2023. Front matter Adaptive octopus deep transfer learning based epileptic seizure classification on field programmable gate arrays Insect Systematics & Evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1